* [PATCH] clk: clk-gpio: do not blame the DT property on probe deferral
@ 2026-09-30 11:49 Francesco Dolcini
2026-09-30 12:24 ` Heiko Stübner
2026-10-01 8:52 ` Jerome Brunet
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Francesco Dolcini @ 2026-09-30 11:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Boyd, Brian Masney, Jerome Brunet
Cc: Francesco Dolcini, linux-clk, linux-kernel, Heiko Stuebner
From: Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@toradex.com>
The message is also stored as the probe deferral reason, where it wrongly
claims the 'enable'/'select' property is missing while it is the GPIO
provider that has not probed (yet?).
Signed-off-by: Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@toradex.com>
---
drivers/clk/clk-gpio.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-gpio.c b/drivers/clk/clk-gpio.c
index 9099c57e2715..918b2c6444ee 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk-gpio.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk-gpio.c
@@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ static int gpio_clk_driver_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
gpiod = devm_gpiod_get(dev, gpio_name, GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
if (IS_ERR(gpiod))
return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(gpiod),
- "Can't get '%s' named GPIO property\n", gpio_name);
+ "Can't get '%s' GPIO\n", gpio_name);
if (is_mux)
hw = clk_hw_register_gpio_mux(dev, gpiod);
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] clk: clk-gpio: do not blame the DT property on probe deferral
2026-09-30 11:49 [PATCH] clk: clk-gpio: do not blame the DT property on probe deferral Francesco Dolcini
@ 2026-09-30 12:24 ` Heiko Stübner
2026-10-01 8:52 ` Jerome Brunet
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Heiko Stübner @ 2026-09-30 12:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Boyd, Brian Masney, Jerome Brunet, Francesco Dolcini
Cc: Francesco Dolcini, linux-clk, linux-kernel
Am Mittwoch, 30. September 2026, 13:49:06 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit schrieb Francesco Dolcini:
> From: Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@toradex.com>
>
> The message is also stored as the probe deferral reason, where it wrongly
> claims the 'enable'/'select' property is missing while it is the GPIO
> provider that has not probed (yet?).
>
> Signed-off-by: Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@toradex.com>
Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] clk: clk-gpio: do not blame the DT property on probe deferral
2026-09-30 11:49 [PATCH] clk: clk-gpio: do not blame the DT property on probe deferral Francesco Dolcini
2026-09-30 12:24 ` Heiko Stübner
@ 2026-10-01 8:52 ` Jerome Brunet
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jerome Brunet @ 2026-10-01 8:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Boyd, Brian Masney, Jerome Brunet, Francesco Dolcini
Cc: Francesco Dolcini, linux-clk, linux-kernel, Heiko Stuebner
Applied to clk/linux.git (clk-pile), thanks!
[1/1] clk: clk-gpio: do not blame the DT property on probe deferral
commit: d7e7f791c1997f500ad8a9b1f7e0855d61011fd0
Best regards,
--
Jerome
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-10-01 8:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-09-30 11:49 [PATCH] clk: clk-gpio: do not blame the DT property on probe deferral Francesco Dolcini
2026-09-30 12:24 ` Heiko Stübner
2026-10-01 8:52 ` Jerome Brunet
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).