Linux Confidential Computing Development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kalra, Ashish" <ashish.kalra@amd.com>
To: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: tglx@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
	x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, seanjc@google.com,
	peterz@infradead.org, thomas.lendacky@amd.com,
	herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, davem@davemloft.net,
	ardb@kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, aik@amd.com,
	Michael.Roth@amd.com, Tycho.Andersen@amd.com,
	Nathan.Fontenot@amd.com, ackerleytng@google.com,
	jackyli@google.com, pgonda@google.com, rientjes@google.com,
	jacobhxu@google.com, xin@zytor.com,
	pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com, babu.moger@amd.com,
	dyoung@redhat.com, nikunj@amd.com, john.allen@amd.com,
	darwi@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-coco@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 2/6] x86/sev: Initialize RMPOPT configuration MSRs
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2026 14:17:03 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1c204da7-1129-4c11-965f-8e623a49170e@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f2a4753a-d7fe-448b-973e-025563ae8a74@amd.com>



On 7/21/2026 9:46 PM, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
> Hello Ashish,
> 
> On 7/22/2026 2:16 AM, Kalra, Ashish wrote:
>> The one I'd keep is (rmp_cfg & MSR_AMD64_SEG_RMP_ENABLED). It's a runtime config bit, not the CPUID feature:
>> setup_rmptable() allocates rmp_segment_table and keeps CC_ATTR_HOST_SEV_SNP set for both segmented and contiguous RMP, so
>> the MSR bit is the only thing that distinguishes them — and RMPOPT needs a segmented RMP.
>>
>> Clearing X86_FEATURE_RMPOPT in snp_rmptable_init() won't work on its own as i mentioned in this reply earlier: it runs at
>> rootfs_initcall, after alternative_instructions(), so cpu_feature_enabled() keeps returning true off the already-patched
>> static_cpu_has().
> 
> My bad! I actually meant in snp_probe_rmptable_info() during
> bsp_determine_snp(). Something like:
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c
> index 8bcdce98f6dc..3ad53ef16c2f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c
> @@ -684,10 +684,12 @@ bool snp_probe_rmptable_info(void)
>  	if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_SEGMENTED_RMP))
>  		rdmsrq(MSR_AMD64_RMP_CFG, rmp_cfg);
>  
> -	if (rmp_cfg & MSR_AMD64_SEG_RMP_ENABLED)
> +	if (rmp_cfg & MSR_AMD64_SEG_RMP_ENABLED) {
>  		return probe_segmented_rmptable_info();
> -	else
> +	} else {
> +		setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_RMPOPT);
>  		return probe_contiguous_rmptable_info();
> +	}
>  }
>  
>  /*
> ---
> 
> Based on a quick look, it gets only called at bsp init and is early
> enough to allow patching alternatives and I don't see anything writing
> to MSR_AMD64_RMP_CFG.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 

Ah, that works — thanks.

With the contiguous case cleared early, X86_FEATURE_RMPOPT set now implies a segmented RMP, so the MSR-bit test drops out and the helper becomes:

  static bool rmpopt_capable(void)
  {
        return cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_RMPOPT) &&
               cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_HOST_SEV_SNP);
  }

I'll keep cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_HOST_SEV_SNP) for the late failures the early clear can't cover: setup_segmented_rmptable() can still
fail in snp_rmptable_init() (rootfs_initcall, i.e. post-alternatives, where clearing the feature bit wouldn't stick) — and on that path
iommu_snp_enable() clears CC_ATTR_HOST_SEV_SNP, so the helper returns false. Same term also covers SNP being disabled at runtime.

Thanks,
Ashish

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-22 19:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-30 18:08 [PATCH v10 0/6] Add RMPOPT support Ashish Kalra
2026-06-30 18:09 ` [PATCH v10 1/6] x86/cpufeatures: Add X86_FEATURE_RMPOPT feature flag Ashish Kalra
2026-07-20 21:12   ` Borislav Petkov
2026-06-30 18:10 ` [PATCH v10 2/6] x86/sev: Initialize RMPOPT configuration MSRs Ashish Kalra
2026-07-20 22:17   ` Borislav Petkov
2026-07-20 22:38     ` Kalra, Ashish
2026-07-21  1:48       ` Borislav Petkov
2026-07-21 14:26         ` Kalra, Ashish
2026-07-21 14:57           ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-07-21 20:46             ` Kalra, Ashish
2026-07-22  2:46               ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-07-22 19:17                 ` Kalra, Ashish [this message]
2026-07-21 15:32           ` Borislav Petkov
2026-06-30 18:11 ` [PATCH v10 3/6] x86/sev: Disable CPU hotplug while SNP is active Ashish Kalra
2026-07-01  9:40   ` Jethro Beekman
2026-07-01 16:39     ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-07-01 21:08       ` Kalra, Ashish
2026-07-01 21:25     ` Kalra, Ashish
2026-07-06 12:02       ` Jethro Beekman
2026-06-30 18:11 ` [PATCH v10 4/6] x86/sev: Add support to perform RMP optimizations asynchronously Ashish Kalra
2026-07-21 15:06   ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-07-22 19:43     ` Kalra, Ashish
2026-06-30 18:11 ` [PATCH v10 5/6] x86/sev: Add interface to re-enable RMP optimizations Ashish Kalra
2026-06-30 18:12 ` [PATCH v10 6/6] KVM: SEV: Perform RMP optimizations on SNP guest shutdown Ashish Kalra
2026-07-20 20:17 ` [PATCH v10 0/6] Add RMPOPT support Kalra, Ashish
2026-07-20 20:28   ` Borislav Petkov
2026-07-20 20:39     ` Kalra, Ashish

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1c204da7-1129-4c11-965f-8e623a49170e@amd.com \
    --to=ashish.kalra@amd.com \
    --cc=Michael.Roth@amd.com \
    --cc=Nathan.Fontenot@amd.com \
    --cc=Tycho.Andersen@amd.com \
    --cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
    --cc=aik@amd.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=darwi@linutronix.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jackyli@google.com \
    --cc=jacobhxu@google.com \
    --cc=john.allen@amd.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=nikunj@amd.com \
    --cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pgonda@google.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xin@zytor.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox