From: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
To: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Cc: linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@amd.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@rivosinc.com>,
Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 03/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add initial pSMMU realm viommu plumbing
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2026 15:36:37 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yq5aecfdnv4i.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <yq5a8q5lz5yn.fsf@kernel.org>
Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org> writes:
> Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com> writes:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2026 at 02:23:31PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm) wrote:
...
>> .. and we demand userspace (VMM) to use IOMMU_VIOMMU_ALLOC ioctl,
>> even if VMM does not actually expose a guest-level SMMU instance.
>> Thus, no user_data.
>>
>> I can get the reasoning behind the flow using this viommu/vdevice.
>>
>> But, on the other hand, I can imagine that a Realm VSMMU would add
>> a new flag with a user_data to this VIOMMU. Then, this flow would
>> give some troubles to VMM (QEMU for example):
>>
>> - For VM with a guest-level SMMU, QEMU creates a realm instance
>> where IOMMU_VIOMMU_TYPE_ARM_REALM_SMMUV3 (with vsmmu) can be
>> allocated.
>> - For VM w/o a guest-level SMMU, QEMU won't create such a realm
>> instance, while still required to invoke the ioctl (w/o vsmmu).
>>
>> Taking a step back, I wonder if we really need to use iommufd for
>> PSMMU activation and its stream table allocations?
>>
>> Here are some facts:
>> - An iommufd has a ctx, that's one per VM. Similarly, a Realm
>> has an RD.
>> - For an RMI command that needs an RD, it makes sense to be per
>> iommufd ctx, e.g. RMI_VSMMU_* or RMI_VDEV_* commands.
>> - PSMMU commands are global; they don't need RD. So they don't
>> seem necessary to tie to an iommufd ctx.
>>
>> Instead, could the PSMMU activation be done after RMI_PSMMU_INFO
>> check? Is there any reason not to do that? A safer timing might
>> be at the device assignment stage?
>>
>
> One of the reasons I added IOMMU_VIOMMU_TYPE_ARM_REALM_SMMUV3 was to
> avoid creating a psmmu object when we are not using a PCI passthrough
> VM. That is also the reason for all the refcounting around the psmmu
> objects.
>
> If we are okay with creating psmmu objects early, then I guess we can go
> with the above approach.
>
How about?
modified drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-iommufd.c
@@ -437,9 +437,6 @@
if (viommu_type == IOMMU_VIOMMU_TYPE_ARM_SMMUV3)
return VIOMMU_STRUCT_SIZE(struct arm_vsmmu, core);
- if (viommu_type == IOMMU_VIOMMU_TYPE_ARM_REALM_SMMUV3)
- return VIOMMU_STRUCT_SIZE(struct arm_vsmmu, core);
-
if (!smmu->impl_ops || !smmu->impl_ops->get_viommu_size)
return 0;
return smmu->impl_ops->get_viommu_size(viommu_type);
@@ -463,14 +460,13 @@
vsmmu->vmid = s2_parent->s2_cfg.vmid;
if (viommu->type == IOMMU_VIOMMU_TYPE_ARM_SMMUV3) {
+ if (arm_smmu_is_realm_viommu(viommu))
+ return arm_realm_smmu_v3_init(viommu, user_data);
+
viommu->ops = &arm_vsmmu_ops;
return 0;
}
- if (viommu->type == IOMMU_VIOMMU_TYPE_ARM_REALM_SMMUV3)
- return arm_realm_smmu_v3_init(viommu, user_data);
-
-
return smmu->impl_ops->vsmmu_init(vsmmu, user_data);
}
modified drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-realm.c
@@ -239,21 +239,27 @@
return 0;
}
+bool arm_smmu_is_realm_viommu(struct iommufd_viommu *viommu)
+{
+ struct kvm *kvm;
+
+ if (!viommu->kvm_file)
+ return false;
+
+ kvm = viommu->kvm_file->private_data;
+ return kvm_is_realm(kvm);
+}
+
int arm_realm_smmu_v3_init(struct iommufd_viommu *viommu,
const struct iommu_user_data *user_data)
{
int ret = 0;
- struct kvm *kvm;
struct rmi_psmmu_params *params;
struct arm_smmu_device *smmu =
container_of(viommu->iommu_dev, struct arm_smmu_device, iommu);
unsigned long rmi_ret;
- if (!viommu->kvm_file)
- return -EINVAL;
-
- kvm = viommu->kvm_file->private_data;
- if (!kvm_is_realm(kvm))
+ if (!arm_smmu_is_realm_viommu(viommu))
return -EINVAL;
if (!(smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_RME))
modified drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
@@ -4515,8 +4515,6 @@
int ret;
mutex_init(&smmu->streams_mutex);
- mutex_init(&smmu->realm.mutex);
- refcount_set(&smmu->realm.users, 0);
smmu->streams = RB_ROOT;
ret = arm_smmu_init_queues(smmu);
@@ -5578,6 +5576,8 @@
return -ENODEV;
}
+ mutex_init(&smmu->realm.mutex);
+ refcount_set(&smmu->realm.users, 0);
smmu->features |= ARM_SMMU_FEAT_RME_IRQ;
return 0;
modified drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
@@ -1282,6 +1282,7 @@
const struct iommu_user_data *user_data);
int arm_vsmmu_cache_invalidate(struct iommufd_viommu *viommu,
struct iommu_user_data_array *array);
+bool arm_smmu_is_realm_viommu(struct iommufd_viommu *viommu);
int arm_realm_smmu_v3_init(struct iommufd_viommu *viommu,
const struct iommu_user_data *user_data);
#else
modified include/uapi/linux/iommufd.h
@@ -1068,7 +1068,6 @@
* VMM must wire the HYP_OWN bit to 0 in guest VINTF_CONFIG register
*/
IOMMU_VIOMMU_TYPE_TEGRA241_CMDQV = 2,
- IOMMU_VIOMMU_TYPE_ARM_REALM_SMMUV3 = 3,
};
/**
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-01 10:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-27 8:53 [RFC PATCH v4 00/16] coco/TSM: Implement host-side support for Arm CCA TDISP setup Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-04-27 8:53 ` [RFC PATCH v4 01/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Discover RME support and realm IRQ topology Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-08-29 18:22 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-09-01 8:46 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-09-01 14:32 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-04-27 8:53 ` [RFC PATCH v4 02/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Save the programmed MSI message in msi_desc Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-04-27 8:53 ` [RFC PATCH v4 03/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add initial pSMMU realm viommu plumbing Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-08-29 20:00 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-09-01 9:17 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-09-01 10:06 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2026-09-01 14:34 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-09-01 17:13 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-09-01 17:18 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-09-01 17:45 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-09-01 17:42 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-09-01 19:08 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-09-02 0:21 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-09-02 1:51 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-09-02 13:10 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-09-02 9:00 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-09-02 12:17 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-09-02 13:15 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-09-02 16:39 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-09-02 23:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-09-03 5:48 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-09-03 17:17 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-09-02 19:30 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-09-03 5:28 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-09-03 14:47 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-09-03 15:13 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-03 17:19 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-09-01 17:36 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-04-27 8:53 ` [RFC PATCH v4 04/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Track realm pSMMU users with refcount_t Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-04-27 8:53 ` [RFC PATCH v4 05/16] coco: host: arm64: Add support for virtual device communication Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-04-27 8:53 ` [RFC PATCH v4 06/16] coco: host: arm64: Add support for RMM vdev objects Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-04-27 8:53 ` [RFC PATCH v4 07/16] coco: host: arm64: Add pdev stream key refresh and purge helpers Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-04-27 8:53 ` [RFC PATCH v4 08/16] coco: host: arm64: Add helpers to unlock and destroy RMM vdev Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-04-27 8:53 ` [RFC PATCH v4 09/16] coco: host: arm64: Add support for da object read RHI handling Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-04-27 8:53 ` [RFC PATCH v4 10/16] coco: host: arm64: Add helper for cached object fetches Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-04-27 8:53 ` [RFC PATCH v4 11/16] coco: host: arm64: Fetch interface report via RMI Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-04-27 8:53 ` [RFC PATCH v4 12/16] coco: host: arm64: Fetch device measurements " Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-04-27 8:53 ` [RFC PATCH v4 13/16] coco: host: KVM: arm64: Handle vdev validate-mapping exits Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-04-27 8:53 ` [RFC PATCH v4 14/16] KVM: arm64: Unmap device mappings when a private granule is destroyed Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-04-27 8:53 ` [RFC PATCH v4 15/16] coco: host: arm64: Transition vdevs to TDISP RUN state Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-04-27 8:53 ` [RFC PATCH v4 16/16] KVM: arm64: CCA: enable DA in realm create parameters Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-08-31 18:08 ` [RFC PATCH v4 00/16] coco/TSM: Implement host-side support for Arm CCA TDISP setup Jason Gunthorpe
2026-09-01 12:44 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-09-01 13:07 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yq5aecfdnv4i.fsf@kernel.org \
--to=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com \
--cc=aik@amd.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=praan@google.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=sameo@rivosinc.com \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yilun.xu@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox