From: Neeraj Kumar <s.neeraj@samsung.com>
To: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Cc: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, nvdimm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gost.dev@samsung.com,
a.manzanares@samsung.com, vishak.g@samsung.com,
neeraj.kernel@gmail.com, cpgs@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 02/20] nvdimm/label: Prep patch to accommodate cxl lsa 2.1 support
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 19:03:57 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1931444790.41757055603941.JavaMail.epsvc@epcpadp1new> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <22727c86-fa5a-416c-a02a-e6be581c748c@intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 15209 bytes --]
On 18/08/25 02:48PM, Dave Jiang wrote:
>
>
>On 7/30/25 5:11 AM, Neeraj Kumar wrote:
>> LSA 2.1 format introduces region label, which can also reside
>> into LSA along with only namespace label as per v1.1 and v1.2
>>
>> As both namespace and region labels are of same size of 256 bytes.
>> Thus renamed "struct nd_namespace_label" to "struct nd_lsa_label",
>> where both namespace label and region label can stay as union.
>>
>> No functional change introduced.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Neeraj Kumar <s.neeraj@samsung.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/nvdimm/label.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++--------------
>> drivers/nvdimm/label.h | 12 ++++++-
>> drivers/nvdimm/namespace_devs.c | 33 +++++++++++++------
>> drivers/nvdimm/nd.h | 2 +-
>> 4 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/label.c b/drivers/nvdimm/label.c
>> index 7a011ee02d79..75bc11da4c11 100644
>> --- a/drivers/nvdimm/label.c
>> +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/label.c
>> @@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ static void nd_label_copy(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd,
>> memcpy(dst, src, sizeof_namespace_index(ndd));
>> }
>>
>> -static struct nd_namespace_label *nd_label_base(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd)
>> +static struct nd_lsa_label *nd_label_base(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd)
>
>This function caught my eye. I think that given the way it's being used, maybe it should be returning 'unsigned long' instead of a struct given every instance it's being used, it gets converted back to 'unsigned long'.
>
>$ git grep -n nd_label_base
>label.c:274:static struct nd_lsa_label *nd_label_base(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd)
>label.c:287: base = (unsigned long) nd_label_base(ndd);
>label.c:296: base = (unsigned long) nd_label_base(ndd);
>label.c:782: offset = (unsigned long) nd_label_base(ndd)
>
Yes Dave, Its added long back (4a826c83db4ed). Sure I will fix it in
next patch-set.
>> {
>> void *base = to_namespace_index(ndd, 0);
>>
>> @@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ static struct nd_namespace_label *nd_label_base(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd)
>> }
>>
>> static int to_slot(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd,
>> - struct nd_namespace_label *nd_label)
>> + struct nd_lsa_label *nd_label)
>> {
>> unsigned long label, base;
>>
>> @@ -289,14 +289,14 @@ static int to_slot(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd,
>> return (label - base) / sizeof_namespace_label(ndd);
>> }
>>
>> -static struct nd_namespace_label *to_label(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd, int slot)
>> +static struct nd_lsa_label *to_label(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd, int slot)
>> {
>> unsigned long label, base;
>>
>> base = (unsigned long) nd_label_base(ndd);
>> label = base + sizeof_namespace_label(ndd) * slot;
>>
>> - return (struct nd_namespace_label *) label;
>> + return (struct nd_lsa_label *) label;
>> }
>>
>> #define for_each_clear_bit_le(bit, addr, size) \
>> @@ -382,9 +382,10 @@ static void nsl_calculate_checksum(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd,
>> }
>>
>> static bool slot_valid(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd,
>> - struct nd_namespace_label *nd_label, u32 slot)
>> + struct nd_lsa_label *lsa_label, u32 slot)
>> {
>> bool valid;
>> + struct nd_namespace_label *nd_label = &lsa_label->ns_label;
>>
>> /* check that we are written where we expect to be written */
>> if (slot != nsl_get_slot(ndd, nd_label))
>> @@ -405,6 +406,7 @@ int nd_label_reserve_dpa(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd)
>> return 0; /* no label, nothing to reserve */
>>
>> for_each_clear_bit_le(slot, free, nslot) {
>> + struct nd_lsa_label *lsa_label;
>> struct nd_namespace_label *nd_label;
>> struct nd_region *nd_region = NULL;
>> struct nd_label_id label_id;
>> @@ -412,9 +414,10 @@ int nd_label_reserve_dpa(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd)
>> uuid_t label_uuid;
>> u32 flags;
>>
>> - nd_label = to_label(ndd, slot);
>> + lsa_label = to_label(ndd, slot);
>> + nd_label = &lsa_label->ns_label;
>>
>> - if (!slot_valid(ndd, nd_label, slot))
>> + if (!slot_valid(ndd, lsa_label, slot))
>> continue;
>>
>> nsl_get_uuid(ndd, nd_label, &label_uuid);
>> @@ -565,11 +568,13 @@ int nd_label_active_count(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd)
>> return 0;
>>
>> for_each_clear_bit_le(slot, free, nslot) {
>> + struct nd_lsa_label *lsa_label;
>> struct nd_namespace_label *nd_label;
>>
>> - nd_label = to_label(ndd, slot);
>> + lsa_label = to_label(ndd, slot);
>> + nd_label = &lsa_label->ns_label;
>>
>> - if (!slot_valid(ndd, nd_label, slot)) {
>> + if (!slot_valid(ndd, lsa_label, slot)) {
>> u32 label_slot = nsl_get_slot(ndd, nd_label);
>> u64 size = nsl_get_rawsize(ndd, nd_label);
>> u64 dpa = nsl_get_dpa(ndd, nd_label);
>> @@ -584,7 +589,7 @@ int nd_label_active_count(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd)
>> return count;
>> }
>>
>> -struct nd_namespace_label *nd_label_active(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd, int n)
>> +struct nd_lsa_label *nd_label_active(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd, int n)
>> {
>> struct nd_namespace_index *nsindex;
>> unsigned long *free;
>> @@ -594,10 +599,10 @@ struct nd_namespace_label *nd_label_active(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd, int n)
>> return NULL;
>>
>> for_each_clear_bit_le(slot, free, nslot) {
>> - struct nd_namespace_label *nd_label;
>> + struct nd_lsa_label *lsa_label;
>>
>> - nd_label = to_label(ndd, slot);
>> - if (!slot_valid(ndd, nd_label, slot))
>> + lsa_label = to_label(ndd, slot);
>> + if (!slot_valid(ndd, lsa_label, slot))
>> continue;
>>
>> if (n-- == 0)
>> @@ -738,7 +743,7 @@ static int nd_label_write_index(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd, int index, u32 seq,
>> }
>>
>> static unsigned long nd_label_offset(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd,
>> - struct nd_namespace_label *nd_label)
>> + struct nd_lsa_label *nd_label)
>> {
>> return (unsigned long) nd_label
>> - (unsigned long) to_namespace_index(ndd, 0);
>> @@ -892,6 +897,7 @@ static int __pmem_label_update(struct nd_region *nd_region,
>> struct nd_namespace_common *ndns = &nspm->nsio.common;
>> struct nd_interleave_set *nd_set = nd_region->nd_set;
>> struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd = to_ndd(nd_mapping);
>> + struct nd_lsa_label *lsa_label;
>> struct nd_namespace_label *nd_label;
>> struct nd_namespace_index *nsindex;
>> struct nd_label_ent *label_ent;
>> @@ -923,8 +929,10 @@ static int __pmem_label_update(struct nd_region *nd_region,
>> return -ENXIO;
>> dev_dbg(ndd->dev, "allocated: %d\n", slot);
>>
>> - nd_label = to_label(ndd, slot);
>> - memset(nd_label, 0, sizeof_namespace_label(ndd));
>> + lsa_label = to_label(ndd, slot);
>> + memset(lsa_label, 0, sizeof_namespace_label(ndd));
>> +
>> + nd_label = &lsa_label->ns_label;
>> nsl_set_uuid(ndd, nd_label, nspm->uuid);
>> nsl_set_name(ndd, nd_label, nspm->alt_name);
>> nsl_set_flags(ndd, nd_label, flags);
>> @@ -942,7 +950,7 @@ static int __pmem_label_update(struct nd_region *nd_region,
>> nd_dbg_dpa(nd_region, ndd, res, "\n");
>>
>> /* update label */
>> - offset = nd_label_offset(ndd, nd_label);
>> + offset = nd_label_offset(ndd, lsa_label);
>> rc = nvdimm_set_config_data(ndd, offset, nd_label,
>> sizeof_namespace_label(ndd));
>> if (rc < 0)
>> @@ -954,7 +962,7 @@ static int __pmem_label_update(struct nd_region *nd_region,
>> if (!label_ent->label)
>> continue;
>> if (test_and_clear_bit(ND_LABEL_REAP, &label_ent->flags) ||
>> - nsl_uuid_equal(ndd, label_ent->label, nspm->uuid))
>> + nsl_uuid_equal(ndd, &label_ent->label->ns_label, nspm->uuid))
>> reap_victim(nd_mapping, label_ent);
>> }
>>
>> @@ -964,14 +972,14 @@ static int __pmem_label_update(struct nd_region *nd_region,
>> if (rc == 0) {
>> list_for_each_entry(label_ent, &nd_mapping->labels, list)
>> if (!label_ent->label) {
>> - label_ent->label = nd_label;
>> - nd_label = NULL;
>> + label_ent->label = lsa_label;
>> + lsa_label = NULL;
>> break;
>> }
>> - dev_WARN_ONCE(&nspm->nsio.common.dev, nd_label,
>> + dev_WARN_ONCE(&nspm->nsio.common.dev, lsa_label,
>> "failed to track label: %d\n",
>> - to_slot(ndd, nd_label));
>> - if (nd_label)
>> + to_slot(ndd, lsa_label));
>> + if (lsa_label)
>> rc = -ENXIO;
>> }
>> mutex_unlock(&nd_mapping->lock);
>> @@ -1042,12 +1050,12 @@ static int del_labels(struct nd_mapping *nd_mapping, uuid_t *uuid)
>>
>> mutex_lock(&nd_mapping->lock);
>> list_for_each_entry_safe(label_ent, e, &nd_mapping->labels, list) {
>> - struct nd_namespace_label *nd_label = label_ent->label;
>> + struct nd_lsa_label *nd_label = label_ent->label;
>>
>> if (!nd_label)
>> continue;
>> active++;
>> - if (!nsl_uuid_equal(ndd, nd_label, uuid))
>> + if (!nsl_uuid_equal(ndd, &nd_label->ns_label, uuid))
>> continue;
>> active--;
>> slot = to_slot(ndd, nd_label);
>> diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/label.h b/drivers/nvdimm/label.h
>> index 0650fb4b9821..4883b3a1320f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/nvdimm/label.h
>> +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/label.h
>> @@ -183,6 +183,16 @@ struct nd_namespace_label {
>> };
>> };
>>
>> +/*
>> + * LSA 2.1 format introduces region label, which can also reside
>> + * into LSA along with only namespace label as per v1.1 and v1.2
>> + */
>> +struct nd_lsa_label {
>> + union {
>> + struct nd_namespace_label ns_label;
>> + };
>> +};
>> +
>> #define NVDIMM_BTT_GUID "8aed63a2-29a2-4c66-8b12-f05d15d3922a"
>> #define NVDIMM_BTT2_GUID "18633bfc-1735-4217-8ac9-17239282d3f8"
>> #define NVDIMM_PFN_GUID "266400ba-fb9f-4677-bcb0-968f11d0d225"
>> @@ -215,7 +225,7 @@ struct nvdimm_drvdata;
>> int nd_label_data_init(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd);
>> size_t sizeof_namespace_index(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd);
>> int nd_label_active_count(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd);
>> -struct nd_namespace_label *nd_label_active(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd, int n);
>> +struct nd_lsa_label *nd_label_active(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd, int n);
>> u32 nd_label_alloc_slot(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd);
>> bool nd_label_free_slot(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd, u32 slot);
>> u32 nd_label_nfree(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd);
>> diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/namespace_devs.c b/drivers/nvdimm/namespace_devs.c
>> index 55cfbf1e0a95..bdf1ed6f23d8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/nvdimm/namespace_devs.c
>> +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/namespace_devs.c
>> @@ -1009,10 +1009,11 @@ static int namespace_update_uuid(struct nd_region *nd_region,
>>
>> mutex_lock(&nd_mapping->lock);
>> list_for_each_entry(label_ent, &nd_mapping->labels, list) {
>> - struct nd_namespace_label *nd_label = label_ent->label;
>> + struct nd_namespace_label *nd_label;
>> struct nd_label_id label_id;
>> uuid_t uuid;
>>
>> + nd_label = &label_ent->label->ns_label;
>> if (!nd_label)
>> continue;
>> nsl_get_uuid(ndd, nd_label, &uuid);
>> @@ -1573,11 +1574,14 @@ static bool has_uuid_at_pos(struct nd_region *nd_region, const uuid_t *uuid,
>> bool found_uuid = false;
>>
>> list_for_each_entry(label_ent, &nd_mapping->labels, list) {
>> - struct nd_namespace_label *nd_label = label_ent->label;
>> + struct nd_lsa_label *lsa_label = label_ent->label;
>> + struct nd_namespace_label *nd_label;
>> u16 position;
>>
>> - if (!nd_label)
>> + if (!lsa_label)
>> continue;
>> +
>> + nd_label = &lsa_label->ns_label;
>> position = nsl_get_position(ndd, nd_label);
>>
>> if (!nsl_validate_isetcookie(ndd, nd_label, cookie))
>> @@ -1615,17 +1619,21 @@ static int select_pmem_id(struct nd_region *nd_region, const uuid_t *pmem_id)
>> for (i = 0; i < nd_region->ndr_mappings; i++) {
>> struct nd_mapping *nd_mapping = &nd_region->mapping[i];
>> struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd = to_ndd(nd_mapping);
>> + struct nd_lsa_label *lsa_label = NULL;
>> struct nd_namespace_label *nd_label = NULL;
>> u64 hw_start, hw_end, pmem_start, pmem_end;
>> struct nd_label_ent *label_ent;
>>
>> lockdep_assert_held(&nd_mapping->lock);
>> list_for_each_entry(label_ent, &nd_mapping->labels, list) {
>> - nd_label = label_ent->label;
>> - if (!nd_label)
>> + lsa_label = label_ent->label;
>> + if (!lsa_label)
>> continue;
>> +
>> + nd_label = &lsa_label->ns_label;
>> if (nsl_uuid_equal(ndd, nd_label, pmem_id))
>> break;
>> + lsa_label = NULL;
>> nd_label = NULL;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -1746,19 +1754,21 @@ static struct device *create_namespace_pmem(struct nd_region *nd_region,
>>
>> /* Calculate total size and populate namespace properties from label0 */
>> for (i = 0; i < nd_region->ndr_mappings; i++) {
>> + struct nd_lsa_label *lsa_label;
>> struct nd_namespace_label *label0;
>> struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd;
>>
>> nd_mapping = &nd_region->mapping[i];
>> label_ent = list_first_entry_or_null(&nd_mapping->labels,
>> typeof(*label_ent), list);
>> - label0 = label_ent ? label_ent->label : NULL;
>> + lsa_label = label_ent ? label_ent->label : NULL;
>>
>> - if (!label0) {
>> + if (!lsa_label) {
>> WARN_ON(1);
>> continue;
>> }
>>
>> + label0 = &lsa_label->ns_label;
>> ndd = to_ndd(nd_mapping);
>> size += nsl_get_rawsize(ndd, label0);
>> if (nsl_get_position(ndd, label0) != 0)
>> @@ -1943,12 +1953,15 @@ static struct device **scan_labels(struct nd_region *nd_region)
>>
>> /* "safe" because create_namespace_pmem() might list_move() label_ent */
>> list_for_each_entry_safe(label_ent, e, &nd_mapping->labels, list) {
>> - struct nd_namespace_label *nd_label = label_ent->label;
>> + struct nd_lsa_label *lsa_label = label_ent->label;
>> + struct nd_namespace_label *nd_label;
>> struct device **__devs;
>>
>> - if (!nd_label)
>> + if (!lsa_label)
>> continue;
>>
>> + nd_label = &lsa_label->ns_label;
>> +
>> /* skip labels that describe extents outside of the region */
>> if (nsl_get_dpa(ndd, nd_label) < nd_mapping->start ||
>> nsl_get_dpa(ndd, nd_label) > map_end)
>> @@ -2122,7 +2135,7 @@ static int init_active_labels(struct nd_region *nd_region)
>> if (!count)
>> continue;
>> for (j = 0; j < count; j++) {
>> - struct nd_namespace_label *label;
>> + struct nd_lsa_label *label;
>>
>> label_ent = kzalloc(sizeof(*label_ent), GFP_KERNEL);
>> if (!label_ent)
>> diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/nd.h b/drivers/nvdimm/nd.h
>> index 1cc06cc58d14..61348dee687d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/nvdimm/nd.h
>> +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/nd.h
>> @@ -376,7 +376,7 @@ enum nd_label_flags {
>> struct nd_label_ent {
>> struct list_head list;
>> unsigned long flags;
>> - struct nd_namespace_label *label;
>> + struct nd_lsa_label *label;
>
>Looking at the series a bit more, I don't think creating 'struct nd_lsa_label' and making all the changes in this patch is necessary. I think an unamed union here of 'struct nd_namespace_label' and 'struct cxl_region_label' should be fine. Most of the CXL region handling should be quite different than namespace handling that the code paths will diverge. Adding a few helper functions should address some of the common code paths or creating separate cxl region based helpers to deal with the rest. i.e. slot_valid() can take a slot number rather than a label type. Being intentional in handling sepcific labeling may be better than trying to force a union between region and namespace labeling.
>
>> };
Thanks for your suggestion Dave. Yes using unnamed union here will be
helpful. I will fix the change in next patch-set.
Regards,
Neeraj
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-05 7:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 85+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20250730121221epcas5p3ffb9e643af6b8ae07cfccf0bdee90e37@epcas5p3.samsung.com>
2025-07-30 12:11 ` [PATCH V2 00/20] Add CXL LSA 2.1 format support in nvdimm and cxl pmem Neeraj Kumar
2025-07-30 12:11 ` [PATCH V2 01/20] nvdimm/label: Introduce NDD_CXL_LABEL flag to set cxl label format Neeraj Kumar
2025-08-13 13:12 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-15 18:06 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-04 13:24 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-04 13:20 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-07-30 12:11 ` [PATCH V2 02/20] nvdimm/label: Prep patch to accommodate cxl lsa 2.1 support Neeraj Kumar
2025-08-13 13:23 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-04 13:27 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-08-15 22:02 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-04 13:31 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-08-18 21:48 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-04 13:33 ` Neeraj Kumar [this message]
2025-08-19 15:38 ` Ira Weiny
2025-09-04 13:42 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-07-30 12:11 ` [PATCH V2 03/20] nvdimm/namespace_label: Add namespace label changes as per CXL LSA v2.1 Neeraj Kumar
2025-07-31 13:12 ` kernel test robot
2025-08-13 13:27 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-04 13:40 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-08-19 15:57 ` Ira Weiny
2025-09-04 13:51 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-08-19 19:36 ` Ira Weiny
2025-09-05 5:34 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-07-30 12:11 ` [PATCH V2 04/20] nvdimm/label: CXL labels skip the need for 'interleave-set cookie' Neeraj Kumar
2025-08-13 13:44 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-04 13:54 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-08-15 21:02 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-04 14:01 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-08-19 16:04 ` Ira Weiny
2025-09-04 14:02 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-07-30 12:11 ` [PATCH V2 05/20] nvdimm/region_label: Add region label updation routine Neeraj Kumar
2025-07-31 15:07 ` kernel test robot
2025-08-13 14:48 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-04 14:06 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-08-15 21:55 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-04 14:12 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-10 14:03 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-15 23:12 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-04 14:13 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-08-19 18:16 ` Ira Weiny
2025-09-04 14:18 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-07-30 12:11 ` [PATCH V2 06/20] nvdimm/region_label: Add region label deletion routine Neeraj Kumar
2025-08-13 14:53 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-04 14:20 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-08-15 22:22 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-04 14:23 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-07-30 12:11 ` [PATCH V2 07/20] nvdimm/namespace_label: Update namespace init_labels and its region_uuid Neeraj Kumar
2025-08-13 14:58 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-04 14:24 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-08-19 18:56 ` Ira Weiny
2025-09-04 14:28 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-09-05 20:08 ` Ira Weiny
2025-09-08 5:36 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-07-30 12:11 ` [PATCH V2 08/20] nvdimm/label: Include region label in slot validation Neeraj Kumar
2025-08-13 15:07 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-04 14:30 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-07-30 12:11 ` [PATCH V2 09/20] nvdimm/namespace_label: Skip region label during ns label DPA reservation Neeraj Kumar
2025-08-13 15:09 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-04 14:31 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-07-30 12:11 ` [PATCH V2 10/20] nvdimm/region_label: Preserve cxl region information from region label Neeraj Kumar
2025-08-13 15:11 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-04 14:33 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-07-30 12:12 ` [PATCH V2 11/20] nvdimm/region_label: Export routine to fetch region information Neeraj Kumar
2025-08-13 15:13 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-30 12:12 ` [PATCH V2 12/20] nvdimm/namespace_label: Skip region label during namespace creation Neeraj Kumar
2025-08-13 15:55 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-04 14:34 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-07-30 12:12 ` [PATCH V2 13/20] cxl/mem: Refactor cxl pmem region auto-assembling Neeraj Kumar
2025-08-20 16:41 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-04 14:39 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-07-30 12:12 ` [PATCH V2 14/20] cxl/region: Add devm_cxl_pmem_add_region() for pmem region creation Neeraj Kumar
2025-08-20 0:30 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-04 14:55 ` Neeraj Kumar
2025-07-30 12:12 ` [PATCH V2 15/20] cxl: Add a routine to find cxl root decoder on cxl bus using cxl port Neeraj Kumar
2025-07-30 12:12 ` [PATCH V2 16/20] cxl/mem: Preserve cxl root decoder during mem probe Neeraj Kumar
2025-07-30 12:12 ` [PATCH V2 17/20] cxl/pmem: Preserve region information into nd_set Neeraj Kumar
2025-07-30 12:12 ` [PATCH V2 18/20] cxl/pmem: Add support of cxl lsa 2.1 support in cxl pmem Neeraj Kumar
2025-07-31 1:36 ` kernel test robot
2025-07-30 12:12 ` [PATCH V2 19/20] cxl/pmem_region: Prep patch to accommodate pmem_region attributes Neeraj Kumar
2025-07-31 1:57 ` kernel test robot
2025-07-31 2:17 ` kernel test robot
2025-07-30 12:12 ` [PATCH V2 20/20] cxl/pmem_region: Add sysfs attribute cxl region label updation/deletion Neeraj Kumar
2025-07-31 10:36 ` kernel test robot
2025-08-07 9:02 ` [PATCH V2 00/20] Add CXL LSA 2.1 format support in nvdimm and cxl pmem Neeraj Kumar
2025-08-12 21:46 ` Dave Jiang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1931444790.41757055603941.JavaMail.epsvc@epcpadp1new \
--to=s.neeraj@samsung.com \
--cc=a.manzanares@samsung.com \
--cc=cpgs@samsung.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=gost.dev@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neeraj.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vishak.g@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox