From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: <alison.schofield@intel.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
Ben Widawsky <bwidawsk@kernel.org>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>, <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] cxl/memdev: Add support for the Inject Poison mailbox command
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 14:40:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221130144057.000024de@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221130143136.00003808@Huawei.com>
On Wed, 30 Nov 2022 14:31:36 +0000
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Nov 2022 20:34:33 -0800
> alison.schofield@intel.com wrote:
>
> > From: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
> >
> > CXL devices optionally support the INJECT POISON mailbox command. Add
> > a sysfs attribute and memdev driver support for injecting poison.
> >
> > When a Device Physical Address (DPA) is written to the inject_poison
> > sysfs attribute send an inject poison command to the device for the
> > specified address.
> >
> > Per the CXL Specification (8.2.9.8.4.2), after receiving a valid
> > inject poison request, the device will return poison when the address
> > is accessed through the CXL.mem bus. Injecting poison adds the address
> > to the device's Poison List and the error source is set to injected
> > error. In addition, the device adds a poison creation event to its
> > internal Informational Event log, updates the Event Status register,
> > and if configured, interrupts the host.
> >
> > Also, per the CXL Specification, it is not an error to inject poison
> > into an address that already has poison present and no error is returned
> > from the device. The memdev driver performs basic sanity checking on the
> > address, however, it does not go as far as reading the poison list to see
> > if the address is on the list. That discovery is left to the device.
> >
> > The inject_poison attribute is only visible for devices supporting
> > the capability.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
> A few trivial things inline. With those fixes LGTM
>
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
>
> > ---
> > Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-cxl | 19 +++++++++
> > drivers/cxl/core/memdev.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h | 3 ++
> > 3 files changed, 75 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-cxl b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-cxl
> > index b715a4609718..20db97f7a1aa 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-cxl
> > +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-cxl
> > @@ -416,3 +416,22 @@ Description:
> > if accessed, and the source of the poison. The retrieved
> > errors are logged as kernel trace events with the label
> > 'cxl_poison'.
> > +
> > +
> > +What: /sys/bus/cxl/devices/memX/inject_poison
> > +Date: December, 2022
> > +KernelVersion: v6.2
> > +Contact: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org
> > +Description:
> > + (WO) When a Device Physical Address (DPA) is written to this
> > + attribute the memdev driver sends an inject poison command to
> > + the device for the specified address. If successful, the device
> > + returns poison when the address is accessed through the CXL.mem
> > + bus. Injecting poison adds the address to the device's Poison
> > + List and the error source is set to injected error. In addition,
> "set to Injected."
>
> perhaps to match spec naming in Media Error Record.
>
> > + the device adds a poison creation event to its internal
> > + Informational Event log, updates the Event Status register, and
> > + if configured, interrupts the host. It is not an error to inject
> > + poison into an address that already has poison present and no
> > + error is returned. The inject_poison attribute is only visible
> > + for devices supporting the capability.
>
> White space issues (spaces instead of tabs?)
>
> Add something about the masked bits / granularity of addresses that are accepted.
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/memdev.c b/drivers/cxl/core/memdev.c
> > index d08b7295a01c..71130813030f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cxl/core/memdev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/memdev.c
> > @@ -142,6 +142,51 @@ static ssize_t trigger_poison_list_store(struct device *dev,
> > }
> > static DEVICE_ATTR_WO(trigger_poison_list);
> >
> > +static int cxl_validate_poison_dpa(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds, u64 dpa)
> > +{
> > + if (!resource_size(&cxlds->dpa_res)) {
> > + dev_dbg(cxlds->dev, "device has no dpa resource\n");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > + if (dpa < cxlds->dpa_res.start || dpa > cxlds->dpa_res.end) {
> > + dev_dbg(cxlds->dev, "dpa:0x%llx not in resource:%pR\n",
> > + dpa, &cxlds->dpa_res);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > + if ((dpa & CXL_POISON_INJECT_RESERVED) != 0) {
> > + dev_dbg(cxlds->dev, "dpa reserve bit(s) [5:0] set 0x%llx\n",
> > + dpa);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static ssize_t inject_poison_store(struct device *dev,
> > + struct device_attribute *attr,
> > + const char *buf, size_t len)
> > +{
> > + struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd = to_cxl_memdev(dev);
> > + struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds = cxlmd->cxlds;
> > + u64 dpa;
> > + int rc;
> > +
> > + rc = kstrtou64(buf, 0, &dpa);
> > + if (rc)
> > + return rc;
> > + rc = cxl_validate_poison_dpa(cxlds, dpa);
> > + if (rc)
> > + return rc;
> > +
> > + dpa = cpu_to_le64(dpa);
> > + rc = cxl_mbox_send_cmd(cxlds, CXL_MBOX_OP_INJECT_POISON, &dpa,
>
> Endianness?
Got thrown by the type and missed the cpu_to_le64(). Use a local __le64 so it's all explicit.
One of the static analysis tools will correctly moan about storing it to a u64
(can't remember which).
>
> > + sizeof(dpa), NULL, cxlds->payload_size);
> > + if (rc)
> > + return rc;
> > +
> > + return len;
> > +}
> > +static DEVICE_ATTR_WO(inject_poison);
> > +
> > static struct attribute *cxl_memdev_attributes[] = {
> > &dev_attr_serial.attr,
> > &dev_attr_firmware_version.attr,
> > @@ -149,6 +194,7 @@ static struct attribute *cxl_memdev_attributes[] = {
> > &dev_attr_label_storage_size.attr,
> > &dev_attr_numa_node.attr,
> > &dev_attr_trigger_poison_list.attr,
> > + &dev_attr_inject_poison.attr,
> > NULL,
> > };
> >
> > @@ -175,6 +221,13 @@ static umode_t cxl_memdev_visible(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *a,
> > to_cxl_memdev(dev)->cxlds->enabled_cmds))
> > return 0;
> > }
> > + if (a == &dev_attr_inject_poison.attr) {
> > + struct device *dev = kobj_to_dev(kobj);
> > +
> > + if (!test_bit(CXL_MEM_COMMAND_ID_INJECT_POISON,
> > + to_cxl_memdev(dev)->cxlds->enabled_cmds))
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > return a->mode;
> > }
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h b/drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h
> > index 19a9e545ac19..0d4c34be7335 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h
> > +++ b/drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h
> > @@ -396,6 +396,9 @@ struct cxl_mbox_poison_payload_out {
> > #define CXL_POISON_SOURCE_INJECTED 3
> > #define CXL_POISON_SOURCE_VENDOR 7
> >
> > +/* Inject & Clear Poison CXL 3.0 Spec 8.2.9.8.4.2/3 */
> > +#define CXL_POISON_INJECT_RESERVED GENMASK_ULL(5, 0)
> > +
> > /**
> > * struct cxl_mem_command - Driver representation of a memory device command
> > * @info: Command information as it exists for the UAPI
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-30 14:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-30 4:34 [PATCH 0/5] cxl: CXL Inject & Clear Poison alison.schofield
2022-11-30 4:34 ` [PATCH 1/5] cxl/memdev: Add support for the Inject Poison mailbox command alison.schofield
2022-11-30 14:31 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-11-30 14:40 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2022-12-01 16:42 ` Dave Jiang
2022-12-08 4:20 ` Alison Schofield
2022-12-01 17:26 ` Dave Jiang
2022-12-08 4:17 ` Alison Schofield
2022-12-04 22:04 ` Dan Williams
2022-12-08 4:16 ` Alison Schofield
2022-11-30 4:34 ` [PATCH 2/5] cxl/memdev: Add support for the Clear " alison.schofield
2022-11-30 14:43 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-12-01 20:14 ` Alison Schofield
2022-12-01 17:54 ` Dave Jiang
2022-12-01 20:09 ` Alison Schofield
2022-11-30 4:34 ` [PATCH 3/5] tools/testing/cxl: Mock the Inject " alison.schofield
2022-11-30 14:58 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-12-08 4:47 ` Alison Schofield
2022-12-08 14:53 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-11-30 4:34 ` [PATCH 4/5] tools/testing/cxl: Mock the Clear " alison.schofield
2022-11-30 15:01 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-11-30 4:34 ` [PATCH 5/5] tools/testing/cxl: Use injected poison for Get Poison List alison.schofield
2022-11-30 15:15 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-12-08 4:30 ` Alison Schofield
2022-12-08 14:54 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221130144057.000024de@Huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=bwidawsk@kernel.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox