Re: Support for CXL v3.0 spec with QEMU

[Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>]

On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 17:34:33 +0530
Ravi Kanth <mvrravikanth@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Jonathan,
> We build qemu with your repository code but we do not see any changes
> in the output of lspci. Do we have any prerequisites / command
> parameters w.r.t on how we boot the qemu for your changes to take
> effect? Please let us know.

As the switch cci is a separate PCI function it needs to be explicitly
added. See the cover letter of kernel switch-cci RFC:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/20230804115414.14391-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com

 -device cxl-upstream,bus=cxl_rp_port0,id=us0,addr=0.0,multifunction=on, \
 -device cxl-switch-mailbox-cci,bus=cxl_rp_port0,addr=0.1,target=us0 \
 -device cxl-downstream,port=0,bus=us0,id=swport0,chassis=0,slot=4 \
 -device cxl-downstream,port=1,bus=us0,id=swport1,chassis=0,slot=5 \

Is the switch part of it.

We don't yet have the additions for MHDs though some discussion on how to
do it has happened.  Those will support some FMAPI command via tunnelling throuhg
the main mailbox.

I'm on vacation from tonight until the 22nd, so good luck. Feel free
to post questions in meantime but my reply will take a while!

Jonathan

> 
> Thanks for your help.
> 
> Thanks
> Ravi
> 
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 10:10 PM Ravi Kanth <mvrravikanth@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Jonathan for pointing this out. I will definitely take a look
> > at this. Current support for the simulation of CCI mailbox is only via
> > MCTP messages or even via CXL driver IOCTLs?
> >
> > Ravi
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 10:03 PM Jonathan Cameron
> > <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> wrote:  
> > >
> > > On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 21:42:12 +0530
> > > Ravi Kanth <mvrravikanth@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >  
> > > > Hello,  
> > >
> > > Hi Ravi,
> > >  
> > > >
> > > > I am writing this mail to know if the latest QEMU has support for CXL
> > > > spec v3.0? I understand from the older tutorials that QEMU has support
> > > > for CXL v2.0. Is there any update to QEMU to support the CXL v3.0? I
> > > > would like to specifically test the CCI mailbox functionality which
> > > > has been added to CXL v3.0 spec.  
> > >
> > > The nature of the CXL specification and the QEMU support is that for
> > > devices there isn't a clear divide between different generations of
> > > the specification. By that I mean, that a device based on the CXL 2.0
> > > specification is compatible with the CXL 3.0 specification. As such,
> > > the QEMU emulation has focused on features of interest - it is a far
> > > from complete implementation of all the options in the CXL 2.0
> > > specification but conversely there are some parts of CXL 3.0 are supported.
> > >
> > > Note that the particular CCI functionality is not yet ready for CXL upstream,
> > > but we do have some support in the staging tree I maintain.
> > >
> > > https://gitlab.com/jic23/qemu/-/commits/cxl-2023-08-07/
> > > specifically
> > > https://gitlab.com/jic23/qemu/-/commit/2eb7e6402a45b359c304cea894a1d27625a4b80c
> > >
> > > Note at this stage we only support subset of commands.
> > > Contributions of more support welcomed!
> > >
> > > Intent of the current support and related MCTP CCI access (over I2C) is
> > > to enable ecosystem development, particularly of fabric managers.
> > > For that a tiny subset of commands was sufficient to be sure the architecture
> > > inside QEMU worked and that the proposed kernel code functions correctly.
> > >
> > > Jonathan
> > >  
> > > >
> > > > Thank you in advance for your assistance.
> > > >
> > > > Ravi  
> > >  
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards
> > M.V.R.Ravi Kanth  
> 
> 
>