From: Yanfei Xu <yanfei.xu@intel.com>
To: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dave@stgolabs.net, jonathan.cameron@huawei.com,
dave.jiang@intel.com, alison.schofield@intel.com,
vishal.l.verma@intel.com, ira.weiny@intel.com,
dan.j.williams@intel.com, ming4.li@intel.com,
yanfei.xu@intel.com
Subject: [v3 1/4] cxl/pci: Fix to record only non-zero ranges
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 19:05:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240813110532.870869-2-yanfei.xu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240813110532.870869-1-yanfei.xu@intel.com>
The function cxl_dvsec_rr_decode() retrieves and records DVSEC ranges
into info->dvsec_range[], regardless of whether it is non-zero range,
and the variable info->ranges indicates the number of non-zero ranges.
However, in cxl_hdm_decode_init(), the validation for
info->dvsec_range[] occurs in a for loop that iterates based on
info->ranges. It may result in zero range to be validated but non-zero
range not be validated, in turn, the number of allowed ranges is to be
0. Address it by only record non-zero ranges.
This fix is not urgent as it requires a configuration that zeroes out
the first dvsec range while populating the second. This has not been
observed, but it is theoretically possible. If this gets picked up for
-stable, no harm done, but there is no urgency to backport.
Fixes: 560f78559006 ("cxl/pci: Retrieve CXL DVSEC memory info")
Signed-off-by: Yanfei Xu <yanfei.xu@intel.com>
---
drivers/cxl/core/pci.c | 8 +-------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c b/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
index a663e7566c48..2d69340134da 100644
--- a/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
@@ -390,10 +390,6 @@ int cxl_dvsec_rr_decode(struct device *dev, int d,
size |= temp & CXL_DVSEC_MEM_SIZE_LOW_MASK;
if (!size) {
- info->dvsec_range[i] = (struct range) {
- .start = 0,
- .end = CXL_RESOURCE_NONE,
- };
continue;
}
@@ -411,12 +407,10 @@ int cxl_dvsec_rr_decode(struct device *dev, int d,
base |= temp & CXL_DVSEC_MEM_BASE_LOW_MASK;
- info->dvsec_range[i] = (struct range) {
+ info->dvsec_range[ranges++] = (struct range) {
.start = base,
.end = base + size - 1
};
-
- ranges++;
}
info->ranges = ranges;
--
2.39.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-13 11:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-13 11:05 [v3 0/4] Fixes for hdm docoder initialization from DVSEC ranges Yanfei Xu
2024-08-13 11:05 ` Yanfei Xu [this message]
2024-08-27 16:11 ` [v3 1/4] cxl/pci: Fix to record only non-zero ranges Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-13 11:05 ` [v3 2/4] cxl/pci: Remove duplicated implementation of waiting for memory_info_valid Yanfei Xu
2024-08-27 16:16 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-28 2:49 ` Yanfei Xu
2024-08-13 11:05 ` [v3 3/4] cxl/pci: Check Mem_info_valid bit for each applicable DVSEC Yanfei Xu
2024-08-27 16:22 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-28 2:54 ` Yanfei Xu
2024-08-13 11:05 ` [v3 4/4] cxl/pci: simplify the check of mem_enabled in cxl_hdm_decode_init() Yanfei Xu
2024-08-27 16:25 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-27 5:04 ` [v3 0/4] Fixes for hdm docoder initialization from DVSEC ranges Yanfei Xu
2024-08-27 16:08 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-28 2:45 ` Yanfei Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240813110532.870869-2-yanfei.xu@intel.com \
--to=yanfei.xu@intel.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming4.li@intel.com \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox