public inbox for linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Yanfei Xu <yanfei.xu@intel.com>
Cc: <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>, <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	<dave.jiang@intel.com>, <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
	<vishal.l.verma@intel.com>, <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
	<dan.j.williams@intel.com>, <ming4.li@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [v3 1/4] cxl/pci: Fix to record only non-zero ranges
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 17:11:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240827171132.00003212@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240813110532.870869-2-yanfei.xu@intel.com>

On Tue, 13 Aug 2024 19:05:29 +0800
Yanfei Xu <yanfei.xu@intel.com> wrote:

> The function cxl_dvsec_rr_decode() retrieves and records DVSEC ranges
> into info->dvsec_range[], regardless of whether it is non-zero range,
> and the variable info->ranges indicates the number of non-zero ranges.
> However, in cxl_hdm_decode_init(), the validation for
> info->dvsec_range[] occurs in a for loop that iterates based on
> info->ranges. It may result in zero range to be validated but non-zero
> range not be validated, in turn, the number of allowed ranges is to be
> 0. Address it by only record non-zero ranges.
> 
> This fix is not urgent as it requires a configuration that zeroes out
> the first dvsec range while populating the second. This has not been
> observed, but it is theoretically possible. If this gets picked up for
> -stable, no harm done, but there is no urgency to backport.
> 
> Fixes: 560f78559006 ("cxl/pci: Retrieve CXL DVSEC memory info")
> Signed-off-by: Yanfei Xu <yanfei.xu@intel.com>

LGTM

Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>



  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-27 16:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-13 11:05 [v3 0/4] Fixes for hdm docoder initialization from DVSEC ranges Yanfei Xu
2024-08-13 11:05 ` [v3 1/4] cxl/pci: Fix to record only non-zero ranges Yanfei Xu
2024-08-27 16:11   ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2024-08-13 11:05 ` [v3 2/4] cxl/pci: Remove duplicated implementation of waiting for memory_info_valid Yanfei Xu
2024-08-27 16:16   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-28  2:49     ` Yanfei Xu
2024-08-13 11:05 ` [v3 3/4] cxl/pci: Check Mem_info_valid bit for each applicable DVSEC Yanfei Xu
2024-08-27 16:22   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-28  2:54     ` Yanfei Xu
2024-08-13 11:05 ` [v3 4/4] cxl/pci: simplify the check of mem_enabled in cxl_hdm_decode_init() Yanfei Xu
2024-08-27 16:25   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-27  5:04 ` [v3 0/4] Fixes for hdm docoder initialization from DVSEC ranges Yanfei Xu
2024-08-27 16:08 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-28  2:45   ` Yanfei Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240827171132.00003212@Huawei.com \
    --to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming4.li@intel.com \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    --cc=yanfei.xu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox