From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
To: Arpit Kumar <arpit1.kumar@samsung.com>
Cc: <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, <gost.dev@samsung.com>,
<linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>, <dave@stgolabs.net>,
<vishak.g@samsung.com>, <krish.reddy@samsung.com>,
<a.manzanares@samsung.com>, <alok.rathore@samsung.com>,
<cpgs@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] hw/cxl: Add Physical Port Control (Opcode 5102h)
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 17:05:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250917170533.00003f03@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250916080736.1266083-3-arpit1.kumar@samsung.com>
On Tue, 16 Sep 2025 13:37:36 +0530
Arpit Kumar <arpit1.kumar@samsung.com> wrote:
> -added assert-deassert PERST implementation
> for physical ports (both USP and DSP's).
> -assert PERST involves bg operation for holding 100ms.
> -reset PPB implementation for physical ports.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arpit Kumar <arpit1.kumar@samsung.com>
See below for why but I've picked this up with this and a define move that
was needed to build it where I've queued it up.
Thanks!
diff --git a/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c b/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c
index 6f7291e6ad..1d16d033c7 100644
--- a/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c
+++ b/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c
@@ -607,7 +607,7 @@ static void *bg_assertcb(void *opaque)
return NULL;
}
-static CXLRetCode deassert_perst(Object *obj, uint8_t pn, CXLUpstreamPort *pp)
+static CXLRetCode cxl_deassert_perst(Object *obj, uint8_t pn, CXLUpstreamPort *pp)
{
if (!pp->pports.perst[pn].issued_assert_perst) {
return CXL_MBOX_INTERNAL_ERROR;
@@ -623,7 +623,7 @@ static CXLRetCode deassert_perst(Object *obj, uint8_t pn, CXLUpstreamPort *pp)
return CXL_MBOX_SUCCESS;
}
-static CXLRetCode assert_perst(Object *obj, uint8_t pn, CXLUpstreamPort *pp)
+static CXLRetCode cxl_assert_perst(Object *obj, uint8_t pn, CXLUpstreamPort *pp)
{
if (pp->pports.perst[pn].issued_assert_perst ||
pp->pports.perst[pn].asrt_time < ASSERT_WAIT_TIME_MS) {
@@ -668,7 +668,6 @@ static CXLRetCode cmd_physical_port_control(const struct cxl_cmd *cmd,
CXLUpstreamPort *pp = CXL_USP(cci->d);
PCIDevice *dev;
uint8_t pn;
- uint8_t ret = CXL_MBOX_SUCCESS;
struct cxl_fmapi_get_physical_port_control_req_pl {
uint8_t ppb_id;
@@ -691,22 +690,19 @@ static CXLRetCode cmd_physical_port_control(const struct cxl_cmd *cmd,
switch (in->ports_op) {
case 0:
- ret = assert_perst(OBJECT(&dev->qdev), pn, pp);
- break;
+ return cxl_assert_perst(OBJECT(&dev->qdev), pn, pp);
case 1:
- ret = deassert_perst(OBJECT(&dev->qdev), pn, pp);
- break;
+ return cxl_deassert_perst(OBJECT(&dev->qdev), pn, pp);
case 2:
if (pp->pports.perst[pn].issued_assert_perst ||
pp->pports.perst[pn].asrt_time < ASSERT_WAIT_TIME_MS) {
return CXL_MBOX_INTERNAL_ERROR;
}
device_cold_reset(&dev->qdev);
- break;
+ return CXL_MBOX_SUCCESS;
default:
return CXL_MBOX_INVALID_INPUT;
}
- return ret;
}
> ---
> hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c | 139 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h | 9 ++
> include/hw/cxl/cxl_mailbox.h | 1 +
Had to move the define for now that went in here because I'm carrying this
further up my tree than Anisa's patch that moved this as a precursor
to the MCTP support.
> include/hw/pci-bridge/cxl_upstream_port.h | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 150 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c b/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c
> index 2a104dd337..8cccb2c0ed 100644
> --- a/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c
> +++ b/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c
> @@ -541,6 +541,120 @@ static CXLRetCode cmd_get_physical_port_state(const struct cxl_cmd *cmd,
> return CXL_MBOX_SUCCESS;
> }
>
> +static void *bg_assertcb(void *opaque)
> +{
> + CXLPhyPortPerst *perst = opaque;
> +
> + /* holding reset phase for 100ms */
> + while (perst->asrt_time--) {
> + usleep(1000);
> + }
> + perst->issued_assert_perst = true;
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static CXLRetCode deassert_perst(Object *obj, uint8_t pn, CXLUpstreamPort *pp)
I think we want to namespace these to cxl given these are not
a PCI standard thing. So when I pick these up I'll prefix with cxl_
> +{
> + if (!pp->pports.perst[pn].issued_assert_perst) {
> + return CXL_MBOX_INTERNAL_ERROR;
> + }
> +
> + QEMU_LOCK_GUARD(&pp->pports.perst[pn].lock);
> + resettable_release_reset(obj, RESET_TYPE_COLD);
> + pp->pports.perst[pn].issued_assert_perst = false;
> + pp->pports.pport_info[pn].link_state_flags &=
> + ~CXL_PORT_LINK_STATE_FLAG_PERST_ASSERTED;
> + pp->pports.perst[pn].asrt_time = ASSERT_WAIT_TIME_MS;
> +
> + return CXL_MBOX_SUCCESS;
> +}
> +
> +static CXLRetCode assert_perst(Object *obj, uint8_t pn, CXLUpstreamPort *pp)
> +{
> + if (pp->pports.perst[pn].issued_assert_perst ||
> + pp->pports.perst[pn].asrt_time < ASSERT_WAIT_TIME_MS) {
> + return CXL_MBOX_INTERNAL_ERROR;
> + }
> +
> + QEMU_LOCK_GUARD(&pp->pports.perst[pn].lock);
> + pp->pports.pport_info[pn].link_state_flags |=
> + CXL_PORT_LINK_STATE_FLAG_PERST_ASSERTED;
> + resettable_assert_reset(obj, RESET_TYPE_COLD);
> + qemu_thread_create(&pp->pports.perst[pn].asrt_thread, "assert_thread",
> + bg_assertcb, &pp->pports.perst[pn], QEMU_THREAD_DETACHED);
> +
> + return CXL_MBOX_SUCCESS;
> +}
> +
> +static struct PCIDevice *cxl_find_port_dev(uint8_t pn, CXLCCI *cci)
> +{
> + CXLUpstreamPort *pp = CXL_USP(cci->d);
> + PCIBus *bus = &PCI_BRIDGE(cci->d)->sec_bus;
> +
> + if (pp->pports.pport_info[pn].current_port_config_state ==
> + CXL_PORT_CONFIG_STATE_USP) {
> + return pci_bridge_get_device(bus);
> + }
> +
> + if (pp->pports.pport_info[pn].current_port_config_state ==
> + CXL_PORT_CONFIG_STATE_DSP) {
> + return pcie_find_port_by_pn(bus, pn);
> + }
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +/* CXL r3.2 Section 7.6.7.1.3: Get Physical Port Control (Opcode 5102h) */
> +static CXLRetCode cmd_physical_port_control(const struct cxl_cmd *cmd,
> + uint8_t *payload_in,
> + size_t len_in,
> + uint8_t *payload_out,
> + size_t *len_out,
> + CXLCCI *cci)
> +{
> + CXLUpstreamPort *pp = CXL_USP(cci->d);
> + PCIDevice *dev;
> + uint8_t pn;
> + uint8_t ret = CXL_MBOX_SUCCESS;
> +
> + struct cxl_fmapi_get_physical_port_control_req_pl {
> + uint8_t ppb_id;
> + uint8_t ports_op;
> + } QEMU_PACKED *in = (void *)payload_in;
> +
> + if (len_in < sizeof(*in)) {
> + return CXL_MBOX_INVALID_PAYLOAD_LENGTH;
> + }
> +
> + pn = in->ppb_id;
> + if (pp->pports.pport_info[pn].port_id != pn) {
> + return CXL_MBOX_INTERNAL_ERROR;
> + }
> +
> + dev = cxl_find_port_dev(pn, cci);
> + if (!dev) {
> + return CXL_MBOX_INTERNAL_ERROR;
> + }
> +
> + switch (in->ports_op) {
> + case 0:
> + ret = assert_perst(OBJECT(&dev->qdev), pn, pp);
To me, direct returns are clearer here.
return cxl_assert_perst();
I tweaked this and the other case statements in here. That lets
me drop the local variable ret and the return code hidden up top.
> + break;
> + case 1:
> + ret = deassert_perst(OBJECT(&dev->qdev), pn, pp);
> + break;
> + case 2:
> + if (pp->pports.perst[pn].issued_assert_perst ||
> + pp->pports.perst[pn].asrt_time < ASSERT_WAIT_TIME_MS) {
> + return CXL_MBOX_INTERNAL_ERROR;
> + }
> + device_cold_reset(&dev->qdev);
> + break;
> + default:
> + return CXL_MBOX_INVALID_INPUT;
> + }
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> /* CXL r3.1 Section 8.2.9.1.2: Background Operation Status (Opcode 0002h) */
> static CXLRetCode cmd_infostat_bg_op_sts(const struct cxl_cmd *cmd,
> uint8_t *payload_in,
> @@ -4347,6 +4461,8 @@ static const struct cxl_cmd cxl_cmd_set_sw[256][256] = {
> cmd_identify_switch_device, 0, 0 },
> [PHYSICAL_SWITCH][GET_PHYSICAL_PORT_STATE] = { "SWITCH_PHYSICAL_PORT_STATS",
> cmd_get_physical_port_state, ~0, 0 },
> + [PHYSICAL_SWITCH][PHYSICAL_PORT_CONTROL] = { "SWITCH_PHYSICAL_PORT_CONTROL",
> + cmd_physical_port_control, 2, 0 },
> [TUNNEL][MANAGEMENT_COMMAND] = { "TUNNEL_MANAGEMENT_COMMAND",
> cmd_tunnel_management_cmd, ~0, 0 },
> };
> @@ -4702,11 +4818,34 @@ static CXLRetCode cxl_set_phy_port_info(CXLCCI *cci)
> void cxl_initialize_mailbox_swcci(CXLCCI *cci, DeviceState *intf,
> DeviceState *d, size_t payload_max)
> {
> + CXLUpstreamPort *pp;
> + uint8_t pn = 0;
> +
> cxl_copy_cci_commands(cci, cxl_cmd_set_sw);
> cci->d = d;
> cci->intf = intf;
> cxl_init_cci(cci, payload_max);
> cxl_set_phy_port_info(cci);
> + /* physical port control */
> + pp = CXL_USP(cci->d);
> + for (int byte_index = 0; byte_index < (CXL_MAX_PHY_PORTS / BITS_PER_BYTE);
> + byte_index++) {
> + unsigned char byte = pp->pports.active_port_bitmask[byte_index];
> +
> + for (int bit_index = 0; bit_index < 8; bit_index++, pn++) {
> + if (((byte) & (1 << bit_index)) != 0) {
> + qemu_mutex_init(&pp->pports.perst[pn].lock);
> + pp->pports.perst[pn].issued_assert_perst = false;
> + /*
> + * Assert PERST involves physical port to be in
> + * hold reset phase for minimum 100ms. No other
> + * physical port control requests are entertained
> + * until Deassert PERST command.
> + */
> + pp->pports.perst[pn].asrt_time = ASSERT_WAIT_TIME_MS;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> }
>
> void cxl_initialize_mailbox_t3(CXLCCI *cci, DeviceState *d, size_t payload_max)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-17 16:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20250916080757epcas5p2db403c9648f7818b22413d90acb4fdd4@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2025-09-16 8:07 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] FM-API Physical Switch Command Set Support Arpit Kumar
2025-09-16 8:07 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] hw/cxl: Refactored Identify Switch Device & Get Physical Port State Arpit Kumar
2025-09-17 15:55 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-19 11:03 ` Arpit Kumar
2025-09-30 14:26 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-16 8:07 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] hw/cxl: Add Physical Port Control (Opcode 5102h) Arpit Kumar
2025-09-17 16:05 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2025-09-19 11:16 ` Arpit Kumar
2025-09-17 16:29 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-19 11:21 ` Arpit Kumar
2026-01-27 15:23 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] FM-API Physical Switch Command Set Support Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-30 12:03 ` Arpit Kumar
2026-01-30 12:31 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250917170533.00003f03@huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=a.manzanares@samsung.com \
--cc=alok.rathore@samsung.com \
--cc=arpit1.kumar@samsung.com \
--cc=cpgs@samsung.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=gost.dev@samsung.com \
--cc=krish.reddy@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=vishak.g@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox