Linux CXL
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
To: Arpit Kumar <arpit1.kumar@samsung.com>
Cc: <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, <gost.dev@samsung.com>,
	<linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>, <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	<vishak.g@samsung.com>, <krish.reddy@samsung.com>,
	<a.manzanares@samsung.com>, <alok.rathore@samsung.com>,
	<cpgs@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] hw/cxl: Add Physical Port Control (Opcode 5102h)
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 17:29:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250917172905.00005fa3@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250916080736.1266083-3-arpit1.kumar@samsung.com>

On Tue, 16 Sep 2025 13:37:36 +0530
Arpit Kumar <arpit1.kumar@samsung.com> wrote:

> -added assert-deassert PERST implementation
>  for physical ports (both USP and DSP's).
> -assert PERST involves bg operation for holding 100ms.
> -reset PPB implementation for physical ports.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arpit Kumar <arpit1.kumar@samsung.com>

> @@ -4702,11 +4818,34 @@ static CXLRetCode cxl_set_phy_port_info(CXLCCI *cci)
>  void cxl_initialize_mailbox_swcci(CXLCCI *cci, DeviceState *intf,
>                                    DeviceState *d, size_t payload_max)
>  {
> +    CXLUpstreamPort *pp;
> +    uint8_t pn = 0;
> +
>      cxl_copy_cci_commands(cci, cxl_cmd_set_sw);
>      cci->d = d;
>      cci->intf = intf;
>      cxl_init_cci(cci, payload_max);
>      cxl_set_phy_port_info(cci);
> +    /* physical port control */
> +    pp = CXL_USP(cci->d);
This bit feels like it is wrongly located.  I ran into this whilst
trying to add back the mctp variant as part of shuffling my cxl staging tree.

Whilst this only gets used for the CCI commands, it is a USP thing not
a mailbox thing as we only want this called once per USP, not once per CCI on the
USP.

Could we move this to a call from cxl_usp_realize?

If something like that works would you mind sending me a patch on top of this
series to do so? I'm not yet set up to test this series so better you do it.

We don't need that upstream until the first MCTP support on USP so this doesn't
block us on that front.

 
Thanks,
Jonathan

> +    for (int byte_index = 0; byte_index < (CXL_MAX_PHY_PORTS / BITS_PER_BYTE);
> +         byte_index++) {
> +        unsigned char byte = pp->pports.active_port_bitmask[byte_index];
> +
> +        for (int bit_index = 0; bit_index < 8; bit_index++, pn++) {
> +            if (((byte) & (1 << bit_index)) != 0) {
> +                qemu_mutex_init(&pp->pports.perst[pn].lock);
> +                pp->pports.perst[pn].issued_assert_perst = false;
> +                /*
> +                 * Assert PERST involves physical port to be in
> +                 * hold reset phase for minimum 100ms. No other
> +                 * physical port control requests are entertained
> +                 * until Deassert PERST command.
> +                 */
> +                pp->pports.perst[pn].asrt_time = ASSERT_WAIT_TIME_MS;
> +            }
> +        }
> +    }
>  }
>  

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-09-17 16:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20250916080757epcas5p2db403c9648f7818b22413d90acb4fdd4@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2025-09-16  8:07 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] FM-API Physical Switch Command Set Support Arpit Kumar
2025-09-16  8:07   ` [PATCH v4 1/2] hw/cxl: Refactored Identify Switch Device & Get Physical Port State Arpit Kumar
2025-09-17 15:55     ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-19 11:03       ` Arpit Kumar
2025-09-30 14:26         ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-16  8:07   ` [PATCH v4 2/2] hw/cxl: Add Physical Port Control (Opcode 5102h) Arpit Kumar
2025-09-17 16:05     ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-19 11:16       ` Arpit Kumar
2025-09-17 16:29     ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2025-09-19 11:21       ` Arpit Kumar
2026-01-27 15:23   ` [PATCH v4 0/2] FM-API Physical Switch Command Set Support Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-30 12:03     ` Arpit Kumar
2026-01-30 12:31       ` Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250917172905.00005fa3@huawei.com \
    --to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=a.manzanares@samsung.com \
    --cc=alok.rathore@samsung.com \
    --cc=arpit1.kumar@samsung.com \
    --cc=cpgs@samsung.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=gost.dev@samsung.com \
    --cc=krish.reddy@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=vishak.g@samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox