From: Arpit Kumar <arpit1.kumar@samsung.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, gost.dev@samsung.com,
linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, dave@stgolabs.net,
vishak.g@samsung.com, krish.reddy@samsung.com,
a.manzanares@samsung.com, alok.rathore@samsung.com,
arpit.sysdev@gmail.com, cpgs@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] hw/cxl: Add Physical Port Control (Opcode 5102h)
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2025 16:46:21 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250919111621.6vuvmkmcvkqpbklx@test-PowerEdge-R740xd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250917170533.00003f03@huawei.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 9954 bytes --]
On 17/09/25 05:05PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>On Tue, 16 Sep 2025 13:37:36 +0530
>Arpit Kumar <arpit1.kumar@samsung.com> wrote:
>
>> -added assert-deassert PERST implementation
>> for physical ports (both USP and DSP's).
>> -assert PERST involves bg operation for holding 100ms.
>> -reset PPB implementation for physical ports.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arpit Kumar <arpit1.kumar@samsung.com>
>See below for why but I've picked this up with this and a define move that
>was needed to build it where I've queued it up.
>
>Thanks!
>
Understood, the changes look good to me.
Thanks for handling it.
>diff --git a/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c b/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c
>index 6f7291e6ad..1d16d033c7 100644
>--- a/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c
>+++ b/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c
>@@ -607,7 +607,7 @@ static void *bg_assertcb(void *opaque)
> return NULL;
> }
>
>-static CXLRetCode deassert_perst(Object *obj, uint8_t pn, CXLUpstreamPort *pp)
>+static CXLRetCode cxl_deassert_perst(Object *obj, uint8_t pn, CXLUpstreamPort *pp)
> {
> if (!pp->pports.perst[pn].issued_assert_perst) {
> return CXL_MBOX_INTERNAL_ERROR;
>@@ -623,7 +623,7 @@ static CXLRetCode deassert_perst(Object *obj, uint8_t pn, CXLUpstreamPort *pp)
> return CXL_MBOX_SUCCESS;
> }
>
>-static CXLRetCode assert_perst(Object *obj, uint8_t pn, CXLUpstreamPort *pp)
>+static CXLRetCode cxl_assert_perst(Object *obj, uint8_t pn, CXLUpstreamPort *pp)
> {
> if (pp->pports.perst[pn].issued_assert_perst ||
> pp->pports.perst[pn].asrt_time < ASSERT_WAIT_TIME_MS) {
>@@ -668,7 +668,6 @@ static CXLRetCode cmd_physical_port_control(const struct cxl_cmd *cmd,
> CXLUpstreamPort *pp = CXL_USP(cci->d);
> PCIDevice *dev;
> uint8_t pn;
>- uint8_t ret = CXL_MBOX_SUCCESS;
>
> struct cxl_fmapi_get_physical_port_control_req_pl {
> uint8_t ppb_id;
>@@ -691,22 +690,19 @@ static CXLRetCode cmd_physical_port_control(const struct cxl_cmd *cmd,
>
> switch (in->ports_op) {
> case 0:
>- ret = assert_perst(OBJECT(&dev->qdev), pn, pp);
>- break;
>+ return cxl_assert_perst(OBJECT(&dev->qdev), pn, pp);
> case 1:
>- ret = deassert_perst(OBJECT(&dev->qdev), pn, pp);
>- break;
>+ return cxl_deassert_perst(OBJECT(&dev->qdev), pn, pp);
> case 2:
> if (pp->pports.perst[pn].issued_assert_perst ||
> pp->pports.perst[pn].asrt_time < ASSERT_WAIT_TIME_MS) {
> return CXL_MBOX_INTERNAL_ERROR;
> }
> device_cold_reset(&dev->qdev);
>- break;
>+ return CXL_MBOX_SUCCESS;
> default:
> return CXL_MBOX_INVALID_INPUT;
> }
>- return ret;
> }
>
>> ---
>> hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c | 139 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h | 9 ++
>> include/hw/cxl/cxl_mailbox.h | 1 +
>
>Had to move the define for now that went in here because I'm carrying this
>further up my tree than Anisa's patch that moved this as a precursor
>to the MCTP support.
>
got it
>
>> include/hw/pci-bridge/cxl_upstream_port.h | 1 +
>> 4 files changed, 150 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c b/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c
>> index 2a104dd337..8cccb2c0ed 100644
>> --- a/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c
>> +++ b/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c
>> @@ -541,6 +541,120 @@ static CXLRetCode cmd_get_physical_port_state(const struct cxl_cmd *cmd,
>> return CXL_MBOX_SUCCESS;
>> }
>>
>> +static void *bg_assertcb(void *opaque)
>> +{
>> + CXLPhyPortPerst *perst = opaque;
>> +
>> + /* holding reset phase for 100ms */
>> + while (perst->asrt_time--) {
>> + usleep(1000);
>> + }
>> + perst->issued_assert_perst = true;
>> + return NULL;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static CXLRetCode deassert_perst(Object *obj, uint8_t pn, CXLUpstreamPort *pp)
>
>I think we want to namespace these to cxl given these are not
>a PCI standard thing. So when I pick these up I'll prefix with cxl_
>
got it
>> +{
>> + if (!pp->pports.perst[pn].issued_assert_perst) {
>> + return CXL_MBOX_INTERNAL_ERROR;
>> + }
>> +
>> + QEMU_LOCK_GUARD(&pp->pports.perst[pn].lock);
>> + resettable_release_reset(obj, RESET_TYPE_COLD);
>> + pp->pports.perst[pn].issued_assert_perst = false;
>> + pp->pports.pport_info[pn].link_state_flags &=
>> + ~CXL_PORT_LINK_STATE_FLAG_PERST_ASSERTED;
>> + pp->pports.perst[pn].asrt_time = ASSERT_WAIT_TIME_MS;
>> +
>> + return CXL_MBOX_SUCCESS;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static CXLRetCode assert_perst(Object *obj, uint8_t pn, CXLUpstreamPort *pp)
>> +{
>> + if (pp->pports.perst[pn].issued_assert_perst ||
>> + pp->pports.perst[pn].asrt_time < ASSERT_WAIT_TIME_MS) {
>> + return CXL_MBOX_INTERNAL_ERROR;
>> + }
>> +
>> + QEMU_LOCK_GUARD(&pp->pports.perst[pn].lock);
>> + pp->pports.pport_info[pn].link_state_flags |=
>> + CXL_PORT_LINK_STATE_FLAG_PERST_ASSERTED;
>> + resettable_assert_reset(obj, RESET_TYPE_COLD);
>> + qemu_thread_create(&pp->pports.perst[pn].asrt_thread, "assert_thread",
>> + bg_assertcb, &pp->pports.perst[pn], QEMU_THREAD_DETACHED);
>> +
>> + return CXL_MBOX_SUCCESS;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct PCIDevice *cxl_find_port_dev(uint8_t pn, CXLCCI *cci)
>> +{
>> + CXLUpstreamPort *pp = CXL_USP(cci->d);
>> + PCIBus *bus = &PCI_BRIDGE(cci->d)->sec_bus;
>> +
>> + if (pp->pports.pport_info[pn].current_port_config_state ==
>> + CXL_PORT_CONFIG_STATE_USP) {
>> + return pci_bridge_get_device(bus);
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (pp->pports.pport_info[pn].current_port_config_state ==
>> + CXL_PORT_CONFIG_STATE_DSP) {
>> + return pcie_find_port_by_pn(bus, pn);
>> + }
>> + return NULL;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* CXL r3.2 Section 7.6.7.1.3: Get Physical Port Control (Opcode 5102h) */
>> +static CXLRetCode cmd_physical_port_control(const struct cxl_cmd *cmd,
>> + uint8_t *payload_in,
>> + size_t len_in,
>> + uint8_t *payload_out,
>> + size_t *len_out,
>> + CXLCCI *cci)
>> +{
>> + CXLUpstreamPort *pp = CXL_USP(cci->d);
>> + PCIDevice *dev;
>> + uint8_t pn;
>> + uint8_t ret = CXL_MBOX_SUCCESS;
>> +
>> + struct cxl_fmapi_get_physical_port_control_req_pl {
>> + uint8_t ppb_id;
>> + uint8_t ports_op;
>> + } QEMU_PACKED *in = (void *)payload_in;
>> +
>> + if (len_in < sizeof(*in)) {
>> + return CXL_MBOX_INVALID_PAYLOAD_LENGTH;
>> + }
>> +
>> + pn = in->ppb_id;
>> + if (pp->pports.pport_info[pn].port_id != pn) {
>> + return CXL_MBOX_INTERNAL_ERROR;
>> + }
>> +
>> + dev = cxl_find_port_dev(pn, cci);
>> + if (!dev) {
>> + return CXL_MBOX_INTERNAL_ERROR;
>> + }
>> +
>> + switch (in->ports_op) {
>> + case 0:
>> + ret = assert_perst(OBJECT(&dev->qdev), pn, pp);
>To me, direct returns are clearer here.
> return cxl_assert_perst();
>
>I tweaked this and the other case statements in here. That lets
>me drop the local variable ret and the return code hidden up top.
>
makes sense, thanks!
>> + break;
>> + case 1:
>> + ret = deassert_perst(OBJECT(&dev->qdev), pn, pp);
>> + break;
>> + case 2:
>> + if (pp->pports.perst[pn].issued_assert_perst ||
>> + pp->pports.perst[pn].asrt_time < ASSERT_WAIT_TIME_MS) {
>> + return CXL_MBOX_INTERNAL_ERROR;
>> + }
>> + device_cold_reset(&dev->qdev);
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + return CXL_MBOX_INVALID_INPUT;
>> + }
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> /* CXL r3.1 Section 8.2.9.1.2: Background Operation Status (Opcode 0002h) */
>> static CXLRetCode cmd_infostat_bg_op_sts(const struct cxl_cmd *cmd,
>> uint8_t *payload_in,
>> @@ -4347,6 +4461,8 @@ static const struct cxl_cmd cxl_cmd_set_sw[256][256] = {
>> cmd_identify_switch_device, 0, 0 },
>> [PHYSICAL_SWITCH][GET_PHYSICAL_PORT_STATE] = { "SWITCH_PHYSICAL_PORT_STATS",
>> cmd_get_physical_port_state, ~0, 0 },
>> + [PHYSICAL_SWITCH][PHYSICAL_PORT_CONTROL] = { "SWITCH_PHYSICAL_PORT_CONTROL",
>> + cmd_physical_port_control, 2, 0 },
>> [TUNNEL][MANAGEMENT_COMMAND] = { "TUNNEL_MANAGEMENT_COMMAND",
>> cmd_tunnel_management_cmd, ~0, 0 },
>> };
>> @@ -4702,11 +4818,34 @@ static CXLRetCode cxl_set_phy_port_info(CXLCCI *cci)
>> void cxl_initialize_mailbox_swcci(CXLCCI *cci, DeviceState *intf,
>> DeviceState *d, size_t payload_max)
>> {
>> + CXLUpstreamPort *pp;
>> + uint8_t pn = 0;
>> +
>> cxl_copy_cci_commands(cci, cxl_cmd_set_sw);
>> cci->d = d;
>> cci->intf = intf;
>> cxl_init_cci(cci, payload_max);
>> cxl_set_phy_port_info(cci);
>> + /* physical port control */
>> + pp = CXL_USP(cci->d);
>> + for (int byte_index = 0; byte_index < (CXL_MAX_PHY_PORTS / BITS_PER_BYTE);
>> + byte_index++) {
>> + unsigned char byte = pp->pports.active_port_bitmask[byte_index];
>> +
>> + for (int bit_index = 0; bit_index < 8; bit_index++, pn++) {
>> + if (((byte) & (1 << bit_index)) != 0) {
>> + qemu_mutex_init(&pp->pports.perst[pn].lock);
>> + pp->pports.perst[pn].issued_assert_perst = false;
>> + /*
>> + * Assert PERST involves physical port to be in
>> + * hold reset phase for minimum 100ms. No other
>> + * physical port control requests are entertained
>> + * until Deassert PERST command.
>> + */
>> + pp->pports.perst[pn].asrt_time = ASSERT_WAIT_TIME_MS;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + }
>> }
>>
>> void cxl_initialize_mailbox_t3(CXLCCI *cci, DeviceState *d, size_t payload_max)
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-19 11:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20250916080757epcas5p2db403c9648f7818b22413d90acb4fdd4@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2025-09-16 8:07 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] FM-API Physical Switch Command Set Support Arpit Kumar
2025-09-16 8:07 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] hw/cxl: Refactored Identify Switch Device & Get Physical Port State Arpit Kumar
2025-09-17 15:55 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-19 11:03 ` Arpit Kumar
2025-09-30 14:26 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-16 8:07 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] hw/cxl: Add Physical Port Control (Opcode 5102h) Arpit Kumar
2025-09-17 16:05 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-19 11:16 ` Arpit Kumar [this message]
2025-09-17 16:29 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-19 11:21 ` Arpit Kumar
2026-01-27 15:23 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] FM-API Physical Switch Command Set Support Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-30 12:03 ` Arpit Kumar
2026-01-30 12:31 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250919111621.6vuvmkmcvkqpbklx@test-PowerEdge-R740xd \
--to=arpit1.kumar@samsung.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=a.manzanares@samsung.com \
--cc=alok.rathore@samsung.com \
--cc=arpit.sysdev@gmail.com \
--cc=cpgs@samsung.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=gost.dev@samsung.com \
--cc=krish.reddy@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=vishak.g@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox