From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Dave Jiang" <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Cc: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 11/13] ACPI: APEI: GHES: Validate memory error section length before payload access
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2026 18:17:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260824181728.6D9F01F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260824174936.939059-12-dave.jiang@intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Unfixed out-of-bounds read and valid record rejection in `cper_print_mem()` for CPER_SEC_PLATFORM_MEM records.
--
--- Patch [11]: [PATCH v4 11/13] ACPI: APEI: GHES: Validate memory error section length before payload access ---
commit 550e022dfc62676e66fb5e0818106e122ddfcbf2
Author: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
ACPI: APEI: GHES: Validate memory error section length before payload access
This commit adds memory error section length validation to ghes_do_proc()
to prevent out-of-bounds reads when handling CPER_SEC_PLATFORM_MEM payloads.
It checks the validation bits to determine the minimum required length.
Link: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260714231835.303081-1-dave.jiang@intel.com?part=7
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -940,6 +962,25 @@ static void ghes_do_proc(struct ghes *ghes,
> if (guid_equal(sec_type, &CPER_SEC_PLATFORM_MEM)) {
> struct cper_sec_mem_err *mem_err = acpi_hest_get_payload(gdata);
>
> + /*
> + * Check once for all three consumers below. The 73-byte
> + * UEFI 2.1/2.2 layout is the floor, matching
> + * cper_estatus_print_section() and making
> + * validation_bits safe to read.
> + */
> + if (gdata->error_data_length <
> + sizeof(struct cper_sec_mem_err_old))
> + continue;
> +
> + /* Then require what the claimed fields actually need. */
> + if (gdata->error_data_length <
> + ghes_mem_err_min_len(mem_err->validation_bits)) {
> + pr_warn_ratelimited(FW_WARN GHES_PFX
> + "memory error section too small (%u) for the fields it claims\n",
> + gdata->error_data_length);
> + continue;
> + }
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this validation happen too late to
prevent out-of-bounds reads when printing the error?
Looking at ghes_proc(), it prints the error status before calling
ghes_do_proc():
drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c:ghes_proc() {
...
if (!ghes_estatus_cached(estatus)) {
if (ghes_print_estatus(NULL, ghes->generic, estatus))
ghes_estatus_cache_add(ghes->generic, estatus);
}
ghes_do_proc(ghes, estatus);
...
}
The call chain goes through ghes_print_estatus() ->
cper_estatus_print_section() -> cper_print_mem(), which has a strict
73-byte length check that allows lengths 74-79 to bypass validation:
drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c:cper_print_mem() {
...
/* Don't trust UEFI 2.1/2.2 structure with bad validation bits */
if (len == sizeof(struct cper_sec_mem_err_old) &&
(mem->validation_bits & ~(CPER_MEM_VALID_RANK_NUMBER - 1))) {
pr_err(FW_WARN "valid bits set for fields beyond structure\n");
return;
}
...
}
If a malformed payload has a length between 74 and 79 bytes and claims
extended fields, does this lead to an out-of-bounds read during
cper_mem_err_pack() before the new checks in ghes_do_proc() can reject it?
drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c:cper_mem_err_pack() {
...
if (mem->validation_bits & CPER_MEM_VALID_MODULE_HANDLE)
cmem->mem_dev_handle = mem->mem_dev_handle;
...
}
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260824174936.939059-1-dave.jiang@intel.com?part=11
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-24 18:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-24 17:49 [PATCH v4 00/13] ACPI: APEI: GHES: Collection of fixes for issues reported by sashiko Dave Jiang
2026-08-24 17:49 ` [PATCH v4 01/13] efi/cper: Reject CPER records with an out-of-range error_data_length Dave Jiang
2026-08-24 18:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 21:57 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-08-25 16:31 ` Dave Jiang
2026-08-24 17:49 ` [PATCH v4 02/13] efi/cper: Reject an error status block length that wraps a u32 Dave Jiang
2026-08-24 18:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 22:22 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-08-24 17:49 ` [PATCH v4 03/13] ACPI: extlog: Validate elog record length before walking sections Dave Jiang
2026-08-24 18:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 22:28 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-08-25 17:15 ` Dave Jiang
2026-08-24 17:49 ` [PATCH v4 04/13] ACPI: extlog: Defer CXL protocol error handling to avoid lock inversion Dave Jiang
2026-08-24 18:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 22:29 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-08-24 17:49 ` [PATCH v4 05/13] ACPI: extlog: Avoid populating software AER metadata from raw hardware buffer Dave Jiang
2026-08-24 18:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 23:05 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-08-25 17:38 ` Dave Jiang
2026-08-24 17:49 ` [PATCH v4 06/13] ACPI: extlog: Validate PCIe error section length before payload access Dave Jiang
2026-08-24 18:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 23:08 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-08-24 17:49 ` [PATCH v4 07/13] ACPI: extlog: Fix CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_PCIEAER guard typo Dave Jiang
2026-08-24 18:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 23:11 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-08-24 17:49 ` [PATCH v4 08/13] ACPI: APEI: GHES: Bound CXL event record copy to the firmware section length Dave Jiang
2026-08-24 23:13 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-08-24 17:49 ` [PATCH v4 09/13] ACPI: APEI: GHES: Validate CXL protocol error section length before RAS cap copy Dave Jiang
2026-08-24 18:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 23:14 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-08-24 17:49 ` [PATCH v4 10/13] efi/cper: Read only validated fields in cper_mem_err_pack() Dave Jiang
2026-08-24 18:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 17:49 ` [PATCH v4 11/13] ACPI: APEI: GHES: Validate memory error section length before payload access Dave Jiang
2026-08-24 18:17 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-24 17:49 ` [PATCH v4 12/13] ACPI: APEI: GHES: Bound AER info copy and sanitize software metadata Dave Jiang
2026-08-24 18:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 21:32 ` Dave Jiang
2026-08-24 17:49 ` [PATCH v4 13/13] cxl/ras: Make cxl_cper_handle_prot_err() static Dave Jiang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260824181728.6D9F01F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).