Linux CXL
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: dave.jiang@intel.com, alison.schofield@intel.com,
	icheng@nvidia.com, ming.li@zohomail.com,
	benjamin.cheatham@amd.com, alucerop@amd.com,
	linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 08/10] cxl: Allow auto-committed BI hdm decoders
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2026 22:45:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260909224531.2befc256@jic23-hlaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260909170302.1550680-9-dave@stgolabs.net>

On Wed,  9 Sep 2026 10:03:00 -0700
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> wrote:

> Allow auto-committed BI hdm decoders on sane platforms, rejecting
> only broken paths (ie: one that cannot route BISnp, or BI paired
> with a host-only target range type).
> 
> The respective region creation is done like any other committed
> decoder - with cxlds->bi set by the time an decoder attaches.
> 
> Skipping the commit does not weaken the rule stated in "cxl/pci: Add
> BI topology enable/disable". Table 8-152 and Table 8-156 key it on a
> new BI device being enabled anywhere below the port, and a level
> firmware already brought up for this device is not seeing one.
> 
> Whether it did is a property of the path, not of the dport: a level's
> committed state only proves firmware committed for some device below
> it, which need not be this one. So adoption starts from the
> endpoint's own BI Enable - only a device firmware itself enabled can
> have had its BI-ID accounted for above - and a level is then taken
> as found when nothing this driver routed sits below it, the control
> value this driver would write is the one already there, the decoder
> is committed, and the switch's route table - which carries a commit
> of its own that firmware may not have performed - is committed too.
> The first level that falls short ends it: from there up the driver
> is enabling something new, and programs and commits as for any
> other device.
> 
> A committed decoder is refused when the window's restrictions do not
> permit its coherency model, on either axis: a BI decoder under a
> window without the BI restriction, or a host-only or device-coherent
> decoder under a window exposing only the other model (undefined
> behavior per the CFMWS Window Restrictions). Assembly so far never
> consulted the type bits, so a platform that sets them wrongly loses
> auto-assembly of the affected decoders, with the refusal naming the
> window.
> 
> A committed decoder cannot inherit a region's coherency model the way
> a decoder this driver programs does, so the type-mismatch refusal
> that "cxl: Add HDM-DB region creation" removed from
> cxl_region_attach() in favor of inheritance returns there for
> committed decoders, on both axes: the committed Target Range Type,
> kept as the decoder's target_type since enumeration, must match the
> region's, and the committed BI bit, read back from the decoder since
> the driver keeps no copy of it, must match the root's. The refusal
> names both models.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
I'm less confident about the flows where the firmware did stuff in
advance in general as never used them in practice, but far as I can
see this is fine.

Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@oss.qualcomm.com>


  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-09 21:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-09 17:02 [PATCH v8 0/10] cxl: Support Back-Invalidate Davidlohr Bueso
2026-09-09 17:02 ` [PATCH v8 01/10] cxl: Add BI register probing and port initialization Davidlohr Bueso
2026-09-09 19:38   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-09 17:02 ` [PATCH v8 02/10] cxl/pci: Add BI topology enable/disable Davidlohr Bueso
2026-09-09 21:21   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-10  1:33     ` Davidlohr Bueso
2026-09-10  2:40   ` Li Ming
2026-09-09 17:02 ` [PATCH v8 03/10] cxl/hdm: Add BI coherency support for endpoint decoders Davidlohr Bueso
2026-09-09 21:27   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-09 17:02 ` [PATCH v8 04/10] cxl: Add HDM-DB region creation Davidlohr Bueso
2026-09-09 17:48   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-09 21:31   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-09 17:02 ` [PATCH v8 05/10] cxl/hdm: Rename decoder coherency flags Davidlohr Bueso
2026-09-09 21:32   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-09 17:02 ` [PATCH v8 06/10] cxl/region: Log the coherency model at region creation Davidlohr Bueso
2026-09-09 21:32   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-09 17:02 ` [PATCH v8 07/10] cxl/pci: Split BI capability probe from setup Davidlohr Bueso
2026-09-09 21:40   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-09 21:45     ` Davidlohr Bueso
2026-09-09 17:03 ` [PATCH v8 08/10] cxl: Allow auto-committed BI hdm decoders Davidlohr Bueso
2026-09-09 21:45   ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2026-09-10 11:38   ` Li Ming
2026-09-09 17:03 ` [PATCH v8 09/10] cxl/test: Add mock BI topology support Davidlohr Bueso
2026-09-09 21:49   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-09 22:08     ` Davidlohr Bueso
2026-09-09 17:03 ` [PATCH v8 10/10] cxl/doc: Update maturity map with BI support Davidlohr Bueso
2026-09-09 21:50   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-09 18:47 ` [PATCH v8 0/10] cxl: Support Back-Invalidate Davidlohr Bueso

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260909224531.2befc256@jic23-hlaptop \
    --to=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
    --cc=alucerop@amd.com \
    --cc=benjamin.cheatham@amd.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=icheng@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.li@zohomail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox