From: Li Ming <ming.li@zohomail.com>
To: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Cc: dan.j.williams@intel.com, dave@stgolabs.net,
jonathan.cameron@huawei.com, alison.schofield@intel.com,
ira.weiny@intel.com, rrichter@amd.com, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] cxl: Add late host bridge uport mapping update
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 10:32:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <85986bda-6a0e-41e6-8ddd-e8ea442eff92@zohomail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250404230049.3578835-4-dave.jiang@intel.com>
On 4/5/2025 6:57 AM, Dave Jiang wrote:
> Error message "cxl portN: Couldn't locate the CXL.cache and CXL.mem
> capability array header" is reported through testing when a platform is
> enabled with PCIe hotplug. The cxl_acpi module is responsible for
> enumerating the host bridges through ACPI objects. During the enumeration
> of the host bridge upstream ports (uports), the root port (RP) registers
> are mapped. The enumeration can happen as soon as the cxl_acpi module
> probe() function is called. However if the CXL link between the endpoint
> device and the RP is not established before the enumeration happens,
> the platform may not expose DVSEC ID 3 and/or DVSEC ID 7 blocks which
> triggers the error message.
>
> Add an attempt to map the register block under the memdev probe() port
> enumeration. When the PCI probe of the device endpoint is called, the
> driver is now communicating with the CXL device and the CXL link is
> considered established. Doing the register block mapping at that point
> guarantees that the mandatory DVSEC blocks are present.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/cxl/acpi.c | 17 +++++++++-
> drivers/cxl/core/port.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> drivers/cxl/cxl.h | 4 +++
> drivers/cxl/port.c | 19 ++---------
> 4 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/acpi.c b/drivers/cxl/acpi.c
> index cb14829bb9be..3c8f04bee9a3 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/acpi.c
> @@ -662,9 +662,24 @@ static int add_host_bridge_uport(struct device *match, void *arg)
> if (rc)
> return rc;
>
> - port = devm_cxl_add_port(host, bridge, component_reg_phys, dport);
> + /*
> + * While there is a chance the uport gets mapped when the probe
> + * function gets called, it is not a guarantee due to acpi driver
> + * can be probed before the root port has established the CXL
> + * connection to the endpoint device. Bypass mapping during
> + * port creation by pass in CXL_RESOURCE_NONE for the
> + * component_reg_phys parameter. After, set the 'resource'
> + * parameter of port->map to allow a setup via the endpoint
> + * memdev probe.
> + */
> + port = devm_cxl_add_port(host, bridge, CXL_RESOURCE_NONE, dport);
> if (IS_ERR(port))
> return PTR_ERR(port);
> + port->reg_map = (struct cxl_register_map) {
> + .host = host,
> + .reg_type = CXL_REGLOC_RBI_EMPTY,
> + .resource = component_reg_phys,
> + };
>
> dev_info(bridge, "host supports CXL\n");
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/port.c b/drivers/cxl/core/port.c
> index 1c772c516dbe..8c29db214d60 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/port.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/port.c
> @@ -758,6 +758,10 @@ static struct cxl_port *cxl_port_alloc(struct device *uport_dev,
> static int cxl_setup_comp_regs(struct device *host, struct cxl_register_map *map,
> resource_size_t component_reg_phys)
> {
> + /* Skip the setup if the map has been setup previously. */
> + if (map->reg_type != CXL_REGLOC_RBI_EMPTY)
> + return 0;
> +
> *map = (struct cxl_register_map) {
> .host = host,
> .reg_type = CXL_REGLOC_RBI_EMPTY,
> @@ -773,7 +777,7 @@ static int cxl_setup_comp_regs(struct device *host, struct cxl_register_map *map
> return cxl_setup_regs(map);
> }
>
> -static int cxl_port_setup_regs(struct cxl_port *port,
> +int cxl_port_setup_regs(struct cxl_port *port,
> resource_size_t component_reg_phys)
> {
> if (dev_is_platform(port->uport_dev))
> @@ -781,6 +785,7 @@ static int cxl_port_setup_regs(struct cxl_port *port,
> return cxl_setup_comp_regs(&port->dev, &port->reg_map,
> component_reg_phys);
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(cxl_port_setup_regs, "CXL");
>
> static int cxl_dport_setup_regs(struct device *host, struct cxl_dport *dport,
> resource_size_t component_reg_phys)
> @@ -1004,7 +1009,7 @@ int devm_cxl_register_pci_bus(struct device *host, struct device *uport_dev,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(devm_cxl_register_pci_bus, "CXL");
>
> -static bool dev_is_cxl_root_child(struct device *dev)
> +bool dev_is_cxl_root_child(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct cxl_port *port, *parent;
>
> @@ -1021,6 +1026,7 @@ static bool dev_is_cxl_root_child(struct device *dev)
>
> return false;
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(dev_is_cxl_root_child, "CXL");
>
> struct cxl_root *find_cxl_root(struct cxl_port *port)
> {
> @@ -1565,6 +1571,57 @@ static resource_size_t find_component_registers(struct device *dev)
> return map.resource;
> }
>
> +int devm_cxl_decoders_setup(struct cxl_port *port)
> +{
> + struct cxl_dport *dport;
> + struct cxl_hdm *cxlhdm;
> + unsigned long index;
> + int dports = 0;
> +
> + /* Make sure that no decoders have been allocated before proceeding. */
> + if (!ida_is_empty(&port->decoder_ida))
> + return 0;
> +
> + cxlhdm = devm_cxl_setup_hdm(port, NULL);
> + if (!IS_ERR(cxlhdm))
> + return devm_cxl_enumerate_decoders(cxlhdm, NULL);
> +
> + if (PTR_ERR(cxlhdm) != -ENODEV) {
> + dev_err(&port->dev, "Failed to map HDM decoder capability\n");
> + return PTR_ERR(cxlhdm);
> + }
> +
> + xa_for_each(&port->dports, index, dport)
> + dports++;
> +
> + if (dports == 1) {
> + dev_dbg(&port->dev, "Fallback to passthrough decoder\n");
> + return devm_cxl_add_passthrough_decoder(port);
> + }
> +
> + dev_err(&port->dev, "HDM decoder capability not found\n");
> + return -ENXIO;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(devm_cxl_decoders_setup, "CXL");
> +
> +static int cxl_hb_port_setup(struct cxl_port *port)
> +{
> + int rc;
> +
> + device_lock_assert(&port->dev);
> +
> + if (!dev_is_cxl_root_child(&port->dev))
> + return 0;
> +
> + cxl_port_probe_dports(port);
> +
> + rc = cxl_port_setup_regs(port, port->reg_map.resource);
> + if (rc)
> + return rc;
> +
> + return devm_cxl_decoders_setup(port);
> +}
> +
> static int add_port_attach_ep(struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd,
> struct device *uport_dev,
> struct device *dport_dev)
> @@ -1605,6 +1662,17 @@ static int add_port_attach_ep(struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd,
> return -ENXIO;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * Initiate delayed host bridge setup here in the path of memdev probe
> + * to ensure that the CXL link is established.
> + */
> + rc = cxl_hb_port_setup(parent_port);
> + if (rc) {
> + dev_warn(&cxlmd->dev, "Failed HB port setup of %s.\n",
> + dev_name(&parent_port->dev));
> + return rc;
> + }
> +
My understanding is that add_port_attach_ep() is only called for cxl switch port adding. cxl hb ports are already added during cxl acpi probing, they can be found in devm_cxl_enumerate_ports().
So if an endpoint directly connects to a root port, seems like no chance to call cxl_hb_port_setup() in add_port_attach_ep().
> port = find_cxl_port_at(parent_port, dport_dev, &dport);
> if (!port) {
> component_reg_phys = find_component_registers(uport_dev);
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> index 0e61b76f5c13..b27e9d3306fe 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> @@ -906,6 +906,10 @@ void cxl_coordinates_combine(struct access_coordinate *out,
> struct access_coordinate *c2);
>
> bool cxl_endpoint_decoder_reset_detected(struct cxl_port *port);
> +int devm_cxl_decoders_setup(struct cxl_port *port);
> +bool dev_is_cxl_root_child(struct device *dev);
> +int cxl_port_setup_regs(struct cxl_port *port,
> + resource_size_t component_reg_phys);
>
> /*
> * Unit test builds overrides this to __weak, find the 'strong' version
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/port.c b/drivers/cxl/port.c
> index 30c0335089b9..dc532ee9065f 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/port.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/port.c
> @@ -59,7 +59,6 @@ static int discover_region(struct device *dev, void *root)
>
> static int cxl_switch_port_probe(struct cxl_port *port)
> {
> - struct cxl_hdm *cxlhdm;
> int rc;
>
> /* Cache the data early to ensure is_visible() works */
> @@ -69,22 +68,10 @@ static int cxl_switch_port_probe(struct cxl_port *port)
> if (rc < 0)
> return rc;
>
> - cxlhdm = devm_cxl_setup_hdm(port, NULL);
> - if (!IS_ERR(cxlhdm))
> - return devm_cxl_enumerate_decoders(cxlhdm, NULL);
> + if (dev_is_cxl_root_child(&port->dev))
> + return 0;
>
> - if (PTR_ERR(cxlhdm) != -ENODEV) {
> - dev_err(&port->dev, "Failed to map HDM decoder capability\n");
> - return PTR_ERR(cxlhdm);
> - }
> -
> - if (rc == 1) {
> - dev_dbg(&port->dev, "Fallback to passthrough decoder\n");
> - return devm_cxl_add_passthrough_decoder(port);
> - }
> -
> - dev_err(&port->dev, "HDM decoder capability not found\n");
> - return -ENXIO;
> + return devm_cxl_decoders_setup(port);
> }
>
> static int cxl_endpoint_port_probe(struct cxl_port *port)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-11 2:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-04 22:57 [PATCH 0/4] cxl: Delay HB port and switch dport probing until endpoint dev probe Dave Jiang
2025-04-04 22:57 ` [PATCH 1/4] cxl: Saperate out CXL dport->id vs actual dport hardware id Dave Jiang
2025-04-22 16:54 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-04-25 22:26 ` Dave Jiang
2025-04-22 19:37 ` Dan Williams
2025-04-25 22:27 ` Dave Jiang
2025-04-04 22:57 ` [PATCH 2/4] cxl: Defer hardware dport->port_id assignment and registers probing Dave Jiang
2025-04-11 2:20 ` Li Ming
2025-04-14 21:45 ` Dave Jiang
2025-04-22 17:05 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-04-25 22:49 ` Dave Jiang
2025-04-22 20:12 ` Dan Williams
2025-04-29 18:41 ` Dave Jiang
2025-04-04 22:57 ` [PATCH 3/4] cxl: Add late host bridge uport mapping update Dave Jiang
2025-04-11 2:32 ` Li Ming [this message]
2025-04-14 22:06 ` Dave Jiang
2025-04-22 17:15 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-04-23 6:10 ` Dan Williams
2025-04-23 15:49 ` Dave Jiang
2025-04-04 22:57 ` [PATCH 4/4] cxl/test: Add workaround for cxl_test for cxl_core calling mocked functions Dave Jiang
2025-04-22 16:31 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-04-29 19:52 ` Dan Williams
2025-04-11 3:05 ` [PATCH 0/4] cxl: Delay HB port and switch dport probing until endpoint dev probe Li Ming
2025-04-14 15:34 ` Dave Jiang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=85986bda-6a0e-41e6-8ddd-e8ea442eff92@zohomail.com \
--to=ming.li@zohomail.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rrichter@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox