Re: [PATCH 0/4 v3] Multi-Region and Volatile Memory support for CXL Type-3 Devices

[Gregory Price <gregory.price@memverge.com>]

ok to summarize then:

patch 1) e820 - submitted as a separate patch/bugfix for mst to pick up

patch 2&3) Pickup by Jonathan for his branch as it depends on DOE and other changes.

patch 4) incorrect, this should be done in bios/efi, drop entirely

On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 11:58:54AM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Oct 2022 16:47:18 -0400
> Gregory Price <gregory.price@memverge.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 08:13:24PM +0000, Adam Manzanares wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 08:47:33PM -0400, Gregory Price wrote:  
> > > > Submitted as an extention to the multi-feature branch maintained
> > > > by Jonathan Cameron at:
> > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://gitlab.com/jic23/qemu/-/tree/cxl-2022-10-24__;!!EwVzqGoTKBqv-0DWAJBm!RyiGL5B1XmQnVFwgxikKJeosPMKtoO1cTr61gIq8fwqfju8l4cbGZGwAEkKXIJB-Dbkfi_LNN2rGCbzMISz65cTxpAxI9pQ$   
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Summary of Changes:
> > > > 1) E820 CFMW Bug fix.  
> > > > 2) Add CXL_CAPACITY_MULTIPLIER definition to replace magic numbers
> > > > 3) Multi-Region and Volatile Memory support for CXL Type-3 Devices
> > > > 4) CXL Type-3 SRAT Generation when NUMA node is attached to memdev
> 
> +CC Dan for a question on status of Generic Ports ACPI code first ECN.
> Given that was done on the mailing list I can find any public tracking
> of whether it was accepted or not - hence whether we can get on with
> implementation.  There hasn't been a release ACPI spec since before
> that was proposed so we need that confirmation of the code first proposal
> being accepted to get things moving.
> 

/* snip for brevity */