From: Fenglin Wu <fenglin.wu@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@kernel.org>,
David Collins <david.collins@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Subbaraman Narayanamurthy
<subbaraman.narayanamurthy@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Kamal Wadhwa <kamal.wadhwa@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Maulik Shah <maulik.shah@oss.qualcomm.com>,
kernel@oss.qualcomm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] dt-bindings: pinctrl: qcom,pmic-gpio: Add level-shifter function
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2026 15:14:34 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1972e522-018b-4a14-ad7f-53c5dfdc860a@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d764694f-0cb6-4488-8ee8-ec4ce658ebd4@kernel.org>
On 6/1/2026 7:30 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 01/06/2026 07:00, Fenglin Wu wrote:
>> On 5/30/2026 6:29 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 28, 2026 at 06:05:36PM -0700, Fenglin Wu wrote:
>>>> Add the "level-shifter" function and add the required DT properties to
>>>> allow RPMh firmware to control the level-shifter. Introduce a custom
>>>> pinconf parameter "qcom,1p2v-1p8v-ls-en" for enabling or disabling the
>>>> level-shifter function.
>>> I don't get how PMIC, which is not a child of RPMh at all or not
>>> talking with RPMh RSC, needs to configure its pin via RPMh. It feels it
>>> is misrepresented.
>> The control for enabling or disabling the bi-directional level shifter
>> has been centralized in AOP, similar to how regulator resources are
>> managed. This allows it to be used on a serial bus shared by multiple
>> clients from different subsystems. Each subsystem can vote for its
>> enable state through RPMh commands, and AOP determines the final status
>> to turn the BIDIR_LVL_SHIFTER PMIC modules on or off. Additionally, each
>> bi-directional level shifter shares its physical pins with a pair of
>> PMIC GPIO modules and is mutually exclusive with other PMIC GPIO
>> functions, which means those PMIC GPIO functions must be disabled.
> So two completely independent hardware devices - PMIC and RPMh -
> configure the same hardware - level shifter and pin function?
Yes if we consider level shifter as a mux function of the GPIO pairs.
>
>> For these reasons, adding bi-directional level shifter software support
>> to the pinctrl-spmi-gpio driver is considered the best approach. Let me
>> know if you have a better suggestion.
>>
>>>> Additionally, add the "groups" property with the allowed group names
>>>> that can be used to control the level-shifter function on pmh0101.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Fenglin Wu <fenglin.wu@oss.qualcomm.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> .../bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-gpio.yaml | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>> include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-gpio.h | 1 +
>>>> 2 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-gpio.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-gpio.yaml
>>>> index b8109e6c2a10..19dc61ddff2d 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-gpio.yaml
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-gpio.yaml
>>>> @@ -119,6 +119,21 @@ properties:
>>>> The first cell will be used to define gpio number and the
>>>> second denotes the flags for this gpio
>>>>
>>>> + qcom,rpmh:
>>>> + description:
>>>> + Phandle to the RPMh controller device. Required for PMICs when the
>>>> + bidirectional level shifters is used (e.g., pmh0101), to enable
>>>> + communication with RPMh firmware for level shifter control.
>>>> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
>>>> +
>>>> + qcom,pmic-id:
>>>> + description:
>>>> + The ID of the PMIC which supports bidirectional level shifter function.
>>>> + It is used as the RPMh resource name suffix to request control of the
>>>> + level shifter to the RPMh firmware.
>>>> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/string
>>>> + pattern: "^[A-N]_E[0-3]+$"
>>> You do not get instance IDs (it's explcitly documented in docs).
>> Okay. This is primarily for creating the resource names used to obtain
>> the rpmh addresses from the cmd-db for the level-shifter.
>>
>> I can change it to a different name if you still agree to add the
>> support in the pinctrl driver.
> ID or name, same thing. Still not allowed.
Okay. Then I don't know how could the driver be able to get the rpmh
address from the cmd-db.
Maybe just like what Dmitry suggested, register a separate, RPMh-based
GPIO driver for those GPIOs associated with the level shifter function,
would be a better approach?
Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] soc: qcom: rpmh: Allow non-child devices to issue
write commands - Dmitry Baryshkov
<https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/4ac5hjmr6divqs4myhcw5sveuboj265sw2jwslbivrfwh5e7ce@6d7ajvgikkgt/>
>
>>>> +
>>>> additionalProperties: false
>>>>
>>>> required:
>>>> @@ -330,6 +345,22 @@ allOf:
>>>> contains:
>>>> enum:
>>>> - qcom,pmh0101-gpio
>>>> + then:
>>>> + properties:
>>>> + gpio-line-names:
>>>> + minItems: 18
>>>> + maxItems: 18
>>>> + gpio-reserved-ranges:
>>>> + minItems: 1
>>>> + maxItems: 9
>>>> + qcom,rpmh: true
>>>> + qcom,pmic-id: true
>>>> +
>>>> + - if:
>>>> + properties:
>>>> + compatible:
>>>> + contains:
>>>> + enum:
>>>> - qcom,pmih0108-gpio
>>>> then:
>>>> properties:
>>>> @@ -523,6 +554,19 @@ $defs:
>>>> items:
>>>> pattern: '^gpio([0-9]+)$'
>>>>
>>>> + groups:
>>>> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/string-array
>>>> + description:
>>>> + List of GPIO groups to apply properties to. Only valid for
>>>> + function "level-shifter" on pmh0101. Valid groups are
>>>> + gpio11, gpio12; gpio13, gpio14; gpio15, gpio16; gpio17, gpio18.
>>>> + items:
>>>> + enum:
>>>> + - gpio11, gpio12
>>>> + - gpio13, gpio14
>>>> + - gpio15, gpio16
>>>> + - gpio17, gpio18
>>>> +
>>>> function:
>>>> items:
>>>> - enum:
>>>> @@ -536,6 +580,7 @@ $defs:
>>>> - dtest4
>>>> - func3 # supported by LV/MV GPIO subtypes
>>>> - func4 # supported by LV/MV GPIO subtypes
>>>> + - level-shifter # supported only by pmh0101
>>>>
>>>> bias-disable: true
>>>> bias-pull-down: true
>>>> @@ -592,9 +637,24 @@ $defs:
>>>> configured as digital input.
>>>> enum: [1, 2, 3, 4]
>>>>
>>>> - required:
>>>> - - pins
>>>> - - function
>>>> + qcom,1p2v-1p8v-ls-en:
>>>> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
>>>> + description:
>>>> + Enable or disable the bidirectional 1.2V/1.8V level shifter
>>>> + associated with the specified GPIO group. When set to 1, an RPMh
>>>> + vote is sent to AOP to enable the level shifter. When set to 0,
>>>> + the vote is withdrawn. Only valid when function is "level-shifter"
>>>> + and groups is a level-shifter GPIO pair (e.g., "gpio11, gpio12"
>>>> + on pmh0101).
>>> And there are no generic pinconf properties defining the voltage?
>> The 1.2V and 1.8V voltages on each side of the bidirectional level
>> shifter are not configurable. They are fixed in the hardware with
>> built-in reference voltages at each side of the pins. I am adding this
>> custom pinconf parameter mainly to control its enabling status. Also, I
>> am adding "1p2v-1p8v" in the parameter name to provide additional
>> clarity for users about the "level-shifter" function.
> So there are or there are not?
There is not such generic pinconf parameter based what I saw here:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-gpio.git/tree/drivers/pinctrl/pinconf-generic.c#n173
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-02 7:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-29 1:05 [PATCH v2 0/4] pinctrl: qcom: spmi-gpio: Add bidirectional level-shifter function support Fenglin Wu
2026-05-29 1:05 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] soc: qcom: rpmh: Allow non-child devices to issue write commands Fenglin Wu
2026-05-29 1:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-01 8:48 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-06-01 13:37 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-06-02 7:29 ` Fenglin Wu
2026-06-04 2:02 ` Fenglin Wu
2026-06-07 21:21 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-06-09 1:28 ` Fenglin Wu
2026-06-11 10:36 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-06-12 0:27 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-06-18 6:39 ` Fenglin Wu
2026-06-30 14:28 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-06-30 14:37 ` Mark Brown
2026-07-01 2:43 ` Fenglin Wu
2026-07-01 11:33 ` Mark Brown
2026-05-29 1:05 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] dt-bindings: pinctrl: qcom,pmic-gpio: Add level-shifter function Fenglin Wu
2026-05-29 2:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-30 10:29 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-06-01 5:00 ` Fenglin Wu
2026-06-01 11:30 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-06-02 7:14 ` Fenglin Wu [this message]
2026-05-29 1:05 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] pinctrl: qcom: spmi-gpio: Rearchitect for flexible group support Fenglin Wu
2026-05-30 10:31 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-06-01 5:17 ` Fenglin Wu
2026-05-29 1:05 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] pinctrl: qcom: spmi-gpio: Add level-shifter function support Fenglin Wu
2026-05-29 3:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-29 20:25 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] pinctrl: qcom: spmi-gpio: Add bidirectional " Linus Walleij
2026-06-01 5:18 ` Fenglin Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1972e522-018b-4a14-ad7f-53c5dfdc860a@oss.qualcomm.com \
--to=fenglin.wu@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=brgl@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=david.collins@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kamal.wadhwa@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=kernel@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linusw@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maulik.shah@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=subbaraman.narayanamurthy@oss.qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox