From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
palmer@dabbelt.com, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@vrull.eu>,
Evan Green <evan@rivosinc.com>,
Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/9] RISC-V: don't parse dt/acpi isa string to get rv32/rv64
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2023 16:51:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230626-dragonish-romp-9acf4846ae01@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230626-e3ea7beb39c584bfbf7ee836@orel>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1182 bytes --]
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 05:14:15PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 12:19:39PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@vrull.eu>
> > @@ -333,8 +335,6 @@ static int c_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
> >
> > of_node_put(node);
> > } else {
> > - if (!acpi_get_riscv_isa(NULL, cpu_id, &isa))
> > - print_isa(m, isa);
> >
>
> Extra blank line here to remove. Actually the whole 'else' can be removed
> because the print_mmu() call can be brought up above the
> 'if (acpi_disabled)'
Can it be? I intentionally did not make that change - wasn't sure
whether re-ordering the fields in there was permissible.
One of the few things I know does parsing of /proc/cpuinfo is:
https://github.com/google/cpu_features/blob/main/src/impl_riscv_linux.c
and that doesn't seem to care about the mmu, but does rely on
vendor/uarch ordering.
Makes me wonder, does ACPI break things by leaving out uarch/vendor
fields, if there is something that expects them to exist? We should
not intentionally break stuff in /proc/cpuinfo, but can't say I feel any
sympathy for naively parsing it.
> > print_mmu(m);
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-26 15:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-26 11:19 [PATCH v1 0/9] RISC-V: Probe DT extension support using riscv,isa-extensions & riscv,isa-base Conor Dooley
2023-06-26 11:19 ` [PATCH v1 1/9] RISC-V: don't parse dt/acpi isa string to get rv32/rv64 Conor Dooley
2023-06-26 15:14 ` Andrew Jones
2023-06-26 15:51 ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2023-06-26 16:05 ` Andrew Jones
2023-06-26 16:16 ` Conor Dooley
2023-06-27 8:02 ` Sunil V L
2023-06-27 8:51 ` Conor Dooley
2023-06-27 9:20 ` Sunil V L
2023-06-26 11:19 ` [PATCH v1 2/9] RISC-V: drop a needless check in print_isa_ext() Conor Dooley
2023-06-26 15:19 ` Andrew Jones
2023-06-26 16:08 ` Conor Dooley
2023-06-26 16:29 ` Andrew Jones
2023-06-26 11:19 ` [PATCH v1 3/9] RISC-V: shunt isa_ext_arr to cpufeature.c Conor Dooley
2023-06-26 15:29 ` Andrew Jones
2023-06-26 15:44 ` Andrew Jones
2023-06-26 15:59 ` Conor Dooley
2023-06-26 11:19 ` [PATCH v1 4/9] RISC-V: repurpose riscv_isa_ext array in riscv_fill_hwcap() Conor Dooley
2023-06-26 15:33 ` Andrew Jones
2023-06-26 11:19 ` [PATCH v1 5/9] RISC-V: add missing single letter extension definitions Conor Dooley
2023-06-26 15:34 ` Andrew Jones
2023-06-26 11:19 ` [PATCH v1 6/9] RISC-V: add single letter extensions to riscv_isa_ext Conor Dooley
2023-06-26 15:42 ` Andrew Jones
2023-06-28 17:33 ` Evan Green
2023-06-28 17:43 ` Conor Dooley
2023-06-28 17:50 ` Evan Green
2023-06-26 11:19 ` [PATCH v1 7/9] RISC-V: split riscv_fill_hwcap() in 3 Conor Dooley
2023-06-26 16:17 ` Andrew Jones
2023-06-27 17:42 ` Conor Dooley
2023-06-26 11:19 ` [PATCH v1 8/9] RISC-V: enable extension detection from new properties Conor Dooley
2023-06-26 16:24 ` Andrew Jones
2023-06-26 11:19 ` [PATCH v1 9/9] RISC-V: try new extension properties in of_early_processor_hartid() Conor Dooley
2023-06-26 16:25 ` Andrew Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230626-dragonish-romp-9acf4846ae01@spud \
--to=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=evan@rivosinc.com \
--cc=heiko.stuebner@vrull.eu \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sunilvl@ventanamicro.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox