public inbox for devicetree@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: Matthew Gerlach <matthew.gerlach@linux.intel.com>
Cc: lpieralisi@kernel.org, kw@linux.com, robh@kernel.org,
	bhelgaas@google.com, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
	dinguyen@kernel.org, joyce.ooi@intel.com,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, matthew.gerlach@altera.com, "D M,
	Sharath Kumar" <sharath.kumar.d.m@intel.com>,
	D@thinkpad, M@thinkpad
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] PCI: altera: Add Agilex support
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:35:41 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250116170541.sszekk76qhvleay6@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250108165909.3344354-6-matthew.gerlach@linux.intel.com>

On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 10:59:09AM -0600, Matthew Gerlach wrote:
> From: "D M, Sharath Kumar" <sharath.kumar.d.m@intel.com>
> 
> Add PCIe root port controller support Agilex family of chips.
> 

Please add more info about the PCIe controller in description. Like speed,
lanes, IP revision etc... Also, you are introducing ep_{read/write}_cfg()
callbacks, so they should also be described here.

> Signed-off-by: D M, Sharath Kumar <sharath.kumar.d.m@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Gerlach <matthew.gerlach@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> v3:
>  - Remove accepted patches from patch set.
> 
> v2:
>  - Match historical style of subject.
>  - Remove unrelated changes.
>  - Fix indentation.
> ---
>  drivers/pci/controller/pcie-altera.c | 246 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 237 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-altera.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-altera.c
> index eb55a7f8573a..da4ae21d661d 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-altera.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-altera.c
> @@ -77,9 +77,19 @@
>  #define S10_TLP_FMTTYPE_CFGWR0		0x45
>  #define S10_TLP_FMTTYPE_CFGWR1		0x44
>  
> +#define AGLX_RP_CFG_ADDR(pcie, reg)	(((pcie)->hip_base) + (reg))
> +#define AGLX_RP_SECONDARY(pcie)		\
> +	readb(AGLX_RP_CFG_ADDR(pcie, PCI_SECONDARY_BUS))
> +
> +#define AGLX_BDF_REG			0x00002004
> +#define AGLX_ROOT_PORT_IRQ_STATUS	0x14c
> +#define AGLX_ROOT_PORT_IRQ_ENABLE	0x150
> +#define CFG_AER				BIT(4)
> +
>  enum altera_pcie_version {
>  	ALTERA_PCIE_V1 = 0,
>  	ALTERA_PCIE_V2,
> +	ALTERA_PCIE_V3,
>  };
>  
>  struct altera_pcie {
> @@ -102,6 +112,11 @@ struct altera_pcie_ops {
>  			   int size, u32 *value);
>  	int (*rp_write_cfg)(struct altera_pcie *pcie, u8 busno,
>  			    int where, int size, u32 value);
> +	int (*ep_read_cfg)(struct altera_pcie *pcie, u8 busno,
> +			   unsigned int devfn, int where, int size, u32 *value);
> +	int (*ep_write_cfg)(struct altera_pcie *pcie, u8 busno,
> +			    unsigned int devfn, int where, int size, u32 value);
> +	void (*rp_isr)(struct irq_desc *desc);
>  };
>  
>  struct altera_pcie_data {
> @@ -112,6 +127,9 @@ struct altera_pcie_data {
>  	u32 cfgrd1;
>  	u32 cfgwr0;
>  	u32 cfgwr1;
> +	u32 port_conf_offset;
> +	u32 port_irq_status_offset;
> +	u32 port_irq_enable_offset;
>  };
>  
>  struct tlp_rp_regpair_t {
> @@ -131,6 +149,28 @@ static inline u32 cra_readl(struct altera_pcie *pcie, const u32 reg)
>  	return readl_relaxed(pcie->cra_base + reg);
>  }
>  
> +static inline void cra_writew(struct altera_pcie *pcie, const u32 value,
> +			      const u32 reg)

No need to add inline keyword to .c files. Compiler will inline the function
anyway if needed.

> +{
> +	writew_relaxed(value, pcie->cra_base + reg);
> +}
> +
> +static inline u32 cra_readw(struct altera_pcie *pcie, const u32 reg)
> +{
> +	return readw_relaxed(pcie->cra_base + reg);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void cra_writeb(struct altera_pcie *pcie, const u32 value,
> +			      const u32 reg)
> +{
> +	writeb_relaxed(value, pcie->cra_base + reg);
> +}
> +
> +static inline u32 cra_readb(struct altera_pcie *pcie, const u32 reg)
> +{
> +	return readb_relaxed(pcie->cra_base + reg);
> +}
> +
>  static bool altera_pcie_link_up(struct altera_pcie *pcie)
>  {
>  	return !!((cra_readl(pcie, RP_LTSSM) & RP_LTSSM_MASK) == LTSSM_L0);
> @@ -145,6 +185,15 @@ static bool s10_altera_pcie_link_up(struct altera_pcie *pcie)
>  	return !!(readw(addr) & PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_DLLLA);
>  }
>  
> +static bool aglx_altera_pcie_link_up(struct altera_pcie *pcie)
> +{
> +	void __iomem *addr = AGLX_RP_CFG_ADDR(pcie,
> +				   pcie->pcie_data->cap_offset +
> +				   PCI_EXP_LNKSTA);
> +
> +	return !!(readw(addr) & PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_DLLLA);

Why this can't be readw_relaxed()?

> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Altera PCIe port uses BAR0 of RC's configuration space as the translation
>   * from PCI bus to native BUS.  Entire DDR region is mapped into PCIe space
> @@ -425,6 +474,103 @@ static int s10_rp_write_cfg(struct altera_pcie *pcie, u8 busno,
>  	return PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL;
>  }
>  
> +static int aglx_rp_read_cfg(struct altera_pcie *pcie, int where,
> +			    int size, u32 *value)
> +{
> +	void __iomem *addr = AGLX_RP_CFG_ADDR(pcie, where);
> +
> +	switch (size) {
> +	case 1:
> +		*value = readb(addr);

Same question as above. Why the relaxed variant is not used here?

> +		break;
> +	case 2:
> +		*value = readw(addr);
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		*value = readl(addr);
> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* interrupt pin not programmed in hardware, set to INTA */
> +	if (where == PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN && size == 1 && !(*value))
> +		*value = 0x01;
> +	else if (where == PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE && !(*value & 0xff00))
> +		*value |= 0x0100;
> +
> +	return PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL;
> +}
> +
> +static int aglx_rp_write_cfg(struct altera_pcie *pcie, u8 busno,
> +			     int where, int size, u32 value)
> +{
> +	void __iomem *addr = AGLX_RP_CFG_ADDR(pcie, where);
> +
> +	switch (size) {
> +	case 1:
> +		writeb(value, addr);
> +		break;
> +	case 2:
> +		writew(value, addr);
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		writel(value, addr);
> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Monitor changes to PCI_PRIMARY_BUS register on root port
> +	 * and update local copy of root bus number accordingly.
> +	 */
> +	if (busno == pcie->root_bus_nr && where == PCI_PRIMARY_BUS)
> +		pcie->root_bus_nr = value & 0xff;
> +
> +	return PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL;
> +}
> +
> +static int aglx_ep_write_cfg(struct altera_pcie *pcie, u8 busno,
> +			     unsigned int devfn, int where, int size, u32 value)
> +{
> +	cra_writel(pcie, ((busno << 8) | devfn), AGLX_BDF_REG);
> +	if (busno > AGLX_RP_SECONDARY(pcie))
> +		where |= (1 << 12); /* type 1 */

Can you use macro definition for this?

> +
> +	switch (size) {
> +	case 1:
> +		cra_writeb(pcie, value, where);
> +		break;
> +	case 2:
> +		cra_writew(pcie, value, where);
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		cra_writel(pcie, value, where);
> +			break;
> +	}
> +
> +	return PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL;
> +}
> +
> +static int aglx_ep_read_cfg(struct altera_pcie *pcie, u8 busno,
> +			    unsigned int devfn, int where, int size, u32 *value)
> +{
> +	cra_writel(pcie, ((busno << 8) | devfn), AGLX_BDF_REG);
> +	if (busno > AGLX_RP_SECONDARY(pcie))
> +		where |= (1 << 12); /* type 1 */

Same here.

> +
> +	switch (size) {
> +	case 1:
> +		*value = cra_readb(pcie, where);
> +		break;
> +	case 2:
> +		*value = cra_readw(pcie, where);
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		*value = cra_readl(pcie, where);
> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	return PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL;
> +}
> +
>  static int _altera_pcie_cfg_read(struct altera_pcie *pcie, u8 busno,
>  				 unsigned int devfn, int where, int size,
>  				 u32 *value)
> @@ -437,6 +583,10 @@ static int _altera_pcie_cfg_read(struct altera_pcie *pcie, u8 busno,
>  		return pcie->pcie_data->ops->rp_read_cfg(pcie, where,
>  							 size, value);
>  
> +	if (pcie->pcie_data->ops->ep_read_cfg)
> +		return pcie->pcie_data->ops->ep_read_cfg(pcie, busno, devfn,
> +							where, size, value);

Why do you need to call both rp_read_cfg() and ep_read_cfg()? This looks wrong.

> +
>  	switch (size) {
>  	case 1:
>  		byte_en = 1 << (where & 3);
> @@ -481,6 +631,10 @@ static int _altera_pcie_cfg_write(struct altera_pcie *pcie, u8 busno,
>  		return pcie->pcie_data->ops->rp_write_cfg(pcie, busno,
>  						     where, size, value);
>  
> +	if (pcie->pcie_data->ops->ep_write_cfg)
> +		return pcie->pcie_data->ops->ep_write_cfg(pcie, busno, devfn,
> +						     where, size, value);
> +
>  	switch (size) {
>  	case 1:
>  		data32 = (value & 0xff) << shift;
> @@ -659,7 +813,30 @@ static void altera_pcie_isr(struct irq_desc *desc)
>  				dev_err_ratelimited(dev, "unexpected IRQ, INT%d\n", bit);
>  		}
>  	}
> +	chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
> +}
> +
> +static void aglx_isr(struct irq_desc *desc)
> +{
> +	struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
> +	struct altera_pcie *pcie;
> +	struct device *dev;
> +	u32 status;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
> +	pcie = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
> +	dev = &pcie->pdev->dev;
>  
> +	status = readl(pcie->hip_base + pcie->pcie_data->port_conf_offset +
> +		       pcie->pcie_data->port_irq_status_offset);
> +	if (status & CFG_AER) {
> +		ret = generic_handle_domain_irq(pcie->irq_domain, 0);
> +		if (ret)
> +			dev_err_ratelimited(dev, "unexpected IRQ\n");

It'd be good to print the IRQ number in error log.

> +	}
> +	writel(CFG_AER, (pcie->hip_base + pcie->pcie_data->port_conf_offset +
> +			 pcie->pcie_data->port_irq_status_offset));

You should clear the IRQ before handling it.

>  	chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
>  }
>  

[...]

> -	/* clear all interrupts */
> -	cra_writel(pcie, P2A_INT_STS_ALL, P2A_INT_STATUS);
> -	/* enable all interrupts */
> -	cra_writel(pcie, P2A_INT_ENA_ALL, P2A_INT_ENABLE);
> -	altera_pcie_host_init(pcie);
> +	if (pcie->pcie_data->version == ALTERA_PCIE_V1 ||
> +	    pcie->pcie_data->version == ALTERA_PCIE_V2) {
> +		/* clear all interrupts */
> +		cra_writel(pcie, P2A_INT_STS_ALL, P2A_INT_STATUS);
> +		/* enable all interrupts */
> +		cra_writel(pcie, P2A_INT_ENA_ALL, P2A_INT_ENABLE);
> +		altera_pcie_host_init(pcie);
> +	} else if (pcie->pcie_data->version == ALTERA_PCIE_V3) {
> +		writel(CFG_AER,
> +		       pcie->hip_base + pcie->pcie_data->port_conf_offset +
> +		       pcie->pcie_data->port_irq_enable_offset);

Why altera_pcie_host_init() is not called for ALTERA_PCIE_V3?

- Mani

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்

  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-16 17:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-08 16:59 [PATCH v3 0/5] Add PCIe Root Port support for Agilex family of chips Matthew Gerlach
2025-01-08 16:59 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] dt-bindings: PCI: altera: Add binding for Agilex Matthew Gerlach
2025-01-08 16:59 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] arm64: dts: agilex: add soc0 label Matthew Gerlach
2025-01-08 16:59 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] arm64: dts: agilex: add dtsi for PCIe Root Port Matthew Gerlach
2025-01-08 18:37   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-01-08 22:53     ` matthew.gerlach
2025-01-08 23:05       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-01-08 16:59 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] arm64: dts: agilex: add dts enabling " Matthew Gerlach
2025-01-08 16:59 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] PCI: altera: Add Agilex support Matthew Gerlach
2025-01-16 17:05   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam [this message]
2025-01-17 19:09     ` matthew.gerlach
2025-01-17 21:09       ` matthew.gerlach
2025-01-08 22:34 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] Add PCIe Root Port support for Agilex family of chips Rob Herring (Arm)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250116170541.sszekk76qhvleay6@thinkpad \
    --to=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=D@thinkpad \
    --cc=M@thinkpad \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dinguyen@kernel.org \
    --cc=joyce.ooi@intel.com \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew.gerlach@altera.com \
    --cc=matthew.gerlach@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sharath.kumar.d.m@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox