Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings:Add SQ52206 to ina2xx devicetree bindings

[Wenliang Yan <wenliang202407@163.com>]

At 2025-01-23 11:30:59, "Guenter Roeck" <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
>On 1/22/25 17:36, Wenliang Yan wrote:
>> At 2025-01-22 15:59:02, "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk@kernel.org> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 09:29:39AM +0800, Wenliang Yan wrote:
>>>> Add the sq52206 compatible to the ina2xx.yaml
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Wenliang Yan <wenliang202407@163.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> Add the meaning of 'shunt-gain' in SQ52206.
>>>
>>> You already sent v3... and you got comment from me. You ignored both
>>> Conor and me, so me doing third time the same and expecting different
>>> results would be definition of insanity.
>>>
>>> Please read carefully submitting patches before posting new version.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Krzysztof
>> 
>> Sorry, I have received your comment and 'acked'. I was originally
>> planning to resend [PATCH v3 2/2], because I have not received a
>> response from Guenter Roeck<linux@roeck-us.net>. However, I forgot to
>> add 'RESEND' in the title. Thank you for your patient reply.
>> I apologize again.
>> 
>
>A resend after just four days, plus dropping all Acks ? Are you serious ?
>
>Please keep in mind that not all of us are getting paid for doing this.
>If I am otherwise busy, it will take longer. Sometimes it will take
>much longer. If you resend a patches, they will end up at the tail
>of my review queue. If you drop Acks, expect me to dig it all up,
>and figure out on my own what if anything changed, the patches will
>end up even further down, as in "I'll look into this series if I have
>nothing else left to review".
>
>Guenter

Sorry for the inconvenience caused by my actions. I am just concerned that
you did not receive the email, and I will continue to wait for your review
and correction.

Best regards,
Wenliang Yan