Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings:Add SQ52206 to ina2xx devicetree bindings

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>]

On 23/01/2025 08:58, Wenliang Yan wrote:
> At 2025-01-23 11:30:59, "Guenter Roeck" <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
>> On 1/22/25 17:36, Wenliang Yan wrote:
>>> At 2025-01-22 15:59:02, "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk@kernel.org> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 09:29:39AM +0800, Wenliang Yan wrote:
>>>>> Add the sq52206 compatible to the ina2xx.yaml
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Wenliang Yan <wenliang202407@163.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>
>>>>> Add the meaning of 'shunt-gain' in SQ52206.
>>>>
>>>> You already sent v3... and you got comment from me. You ignored both
>>>> Conor and me, so me doing third time the same and expecting different
>>>> results would be definition of insanity.
>>>>
>>>> Please read carefully submitting patches before posting new version.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Krzysztof
>>>
>>> Sorry, I have received your comment and 'acked'. I was originally
>>> planning to resend [PATCH v3 2/2], because I have not received a
>>> response from Guenter Roeck<linux@roeck-us.net>. However, I forgot to
>>> add 'RESEND' in the title. Thank you for your patient reply.
>>> I apologize again.
>>>
>>
>> A resend after just four days, plus dropping all Acks ? Are you serious ?
>>
>> Please keep in mind that not all of us are getting paid for doing this.
>> If I am otherwise busy, it will take longer. Sometimes it will take
>> much longer. If you resend a patches, they will end up at the tail
>> of my review queue. If you drop Acks, expect me to dig it all up,
>> and figure out on my own what if anything changed, the patches will
>> end up even further down, as in "I'll look into this series if I have
>> nothing else left to review".
>>
>> Guenter
> 
> Sorry for the inconvenience caused by my actions. I am just concerned that
> you did not receive the email, and I will continue to wait for your review
> and correction.
What review? I am telling you that you ignored us twice and I am not
doing the same third time expecting different results.

How did you respond to this:

"Please read carefully submitting patches before posting new version."

?

How did you respond to previous acks?

Best regards,
Krzysztof