Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Yu-Chun Lin" <eleanor.lin@realtek.com>
Cc: conor+dt@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] gpio: regmap: Add set_config callback
Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 04:23:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260513042325.68C09C2BCB7@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260512033317.1602537-5-eleanor.lin@realtek.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] The `set_config` callback leaks the underlying `struct gpio_chip` to the driver, breaking the abstraction boundary provided by `gpio_regmap`.
--

commit ac512057e733370619e59d76ffbee25d7ea97d9f
Author: Yu-Chun Lin <eleanor.lin@realtek.com>

gpio: regmap: Add set_config callback

This commit adds a new set_config callback to struct gpio_regmap_config
to allow drivers to implement hardware-specific configurations like
debounce settings or other platform-specific GPIO properties.

> diff --git a/include/linux/gpio/regmap.h b/include/linux/gpio/regmap.h
> --- a/include/linux/gpio/regmap.h
> +++ b/include/linux/gpio/regmap.h
[ ... ]
> @@ -142,6 +145,10 @@ struct gpio_regmap_config {
>  			       unsigned long *valid_mask,
>  			       unsigned int ngpios);
>  
> +	int (*set_config)(struct gpio_chip *gc,
> +			  unsigned int offset,
> +			  unsigned long config);
> +
>  	void *drvdata;
>  };

Does exposing struct gpio_chip directly to the driver break the
abstraction boundary provided by gpio_regmap?

The gpio_regmap library appears designed to abstract away struct gpio_chip
from generic regmap-based drivers. For instance, the reg_mask_xlate
callback takes a struct gpio_regmap pointer rather than the raw chip.

Because gpio_regmap sets its own internal structure as the private data
of the gpio_chip during registration via gpiochip_add_data(), drivers cannot
simply access their private data using gpiochip_get_data(). They would
instead be forced to use a lookup chain like
gpio_regmap_get_drvdata(gpiochip_get_data(gc)).

Would it be better to have the callback in struct gpio_regmap_config take
a struct gpio_regmap pointer instead?

> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-regmap.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-regmap.c
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-regmap.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-regmap.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -371,6 +371,8 @@ struct gpio_regmap *gpio_regmap_register(const struct gpio_regmap_config *config
>  	if (!gpio->reg_mask_xlate)
>  		gpio->reg_mask_xlate = gpio_regmap_simple_xlate;
>  
> +	chip->set_config = config->set_config;
> +
>  	ret = gpiochip_add_data(chip, gpio);
>  	if (ret < 0)

If the struct gpio_regmap_config callback is updated to use struct
gpio_regmap, could an internal wrapper function be added here in
gpio-regmap.c?

The wrapper could implement the struct gpio_chip set_config signature,
handle the translation from struct gpio_chip to struct gpio_regmap, and then
invoke the driver's config->set_config callback.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260512033317.1602537-1-eleanor.lin@realtek.com?part=4

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-05-13  4:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-12  3:33 [PATCH v3 0/7] gpio: realtek: Add support for Realtek DHC RTD1625 Yu-Chun Lin
2026-05-12  3:33 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] gpio: Replace "default y" with "default ARCH_REALTEK" in Kconfig Yu-Chun Lin
2026-05-12  3:33 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] gpio: regmap: add gpio_regmap_get_gpiochip() accessor Yu-Chun Lin
2026-05-12 11:20   ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-05-12  3:33 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] gpio: regmap: Add gpio_regmap_operation and write-enable support Yu-Chun Lin
2026-05-12 11:26   ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-05-12 14:37   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-05-13  4:01   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-13  7:40   ` Linus Walleij
2026-05-12  3:33 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] gpio: regmap: Add set_config callback Yu-Chun Lin
2026-05-12 18:12   ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-05-13  4:23   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-12  3:33 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] dt-bindings: gpio: realtek: Add realtek,rtd1625-gpio Yu-Chun Lin
2026-05-13  4:26   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-12  3:33 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] gpio: realtek: Add driver for Realtek DHC RTD1625 SoC Yu-Chun Lin
2026-05-12 18:50   ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-05-13  4:56   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-12  3:33 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] arm64: dts: realtek: Add GPIO support for RTD1625 Yu-Chun Lin
2026-05-13  5:40   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260513042325.68C09C2BCB7@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=eleanor.lin@realtek.com \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox