From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "George Moussalem via B4 Relay"
<devnull+george.moussalem.outlook.com@kernel.org>
Cc: conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq5018: Correct CMN PLL reference clock rate
Date: Tue, 19 May 2026 06:09:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260519060959.CD84FC2BCB3@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260519-ipq5018-cmn-pll-rate-fix-v1-1-3c83a173c27f@outlook.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] The commit message incorrectly refers to 4.8 GHz as the 'CMN PLL reference clock rate'.
--
commit 4cb93e818beccfa0a5e9ea288ba3c76a08ea178c
Author: George Moussalem <george.moussalem@outlook.com>
arm64: dts: qcom: ipq5018: Correct CMN PLL reference clock rate
This commit corrects the CMN PLL clock rate configuration for the IPQ5018
in the device tree to 4.8 GHz, aligning it with the driver's updated clock
divider math.
> arm64: dts: qcom: ipq5018: Correct CMN PLL reference clock rate
>
> The correct CMN PLL reference clock rate for IPQ5018 is 4.8 GHz.
>
> The CMN PLL driver did not account for the ref clock divider which is 2
> for IPQ5018. Therefore, the computed rate was twice the actual output.
This isn't a bug in the device tree changes, but does the commit message
conflate the output rate with the input reference clock rate?
In PLL terminology, the input reference clock for the IPQ5018 CMN PLL is
96 MHz. The 4.8 GHz value being configured via assigned-clock-rates-u64
is the output (or VCO) rate of the CMN PLL, rather than the reference
clock rate.
Could the subject and commit message be updated to clarify that 4.8 GHz
is the output rate?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260519-ipq5018-cmn-pll-rate-fix-v1-1-3c83a173c27f@outlook.com?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-19 6:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-19 5:56 [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq5018: Correct CMN PLL reference clock rate George Moussalem via B4 Relay
2026-05-19 6:09 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260519060959.CD84FC2BCB3@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=devnull+george.moussalem.outlook.com@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox