From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Taha Narimani" <tahanarimani3443@gmail.com>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: iio: adc: Add schema for AD7816/7/8 digital temperature sensor
Date: Sat, 30 May 2026 11:06:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260530110658.30EB11F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260530135302.54688-1-tahanarimani3443@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Missing concurrency protection during sysfs accesses.
- [High] Stack-allocated buffers are passed directly to `spi_read()` and `spi_write()`, violating DMA mapping rules.
- [High] Unbounded polling loop for the BUSY pin can cause a hard CPU lockup.
--
commit cb7e57cc9cdde2668abda84c0f0d3e60ebb9a962
Author: Taha Narimani <tahanarimani3443@gmail.com>
dt-bindings: iio: adc: Add schema for AD7816/7/8 digital temperature sensor
This commit adds a new YAML device tree binding schema for the Analog
Devices AD7816, AD7817, and AD7818 digital temperature sensors. It
documents the compatible strings, SPI configuration, interrupts, and
required GPIO pins.
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/adi,ad7816.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/adi,ad7816.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..74008c14d40c6
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/adi,ad7816.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/iio/adc/adi,ad7816.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
[ ... ]
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + enum:
> + - adi,ad7816
> + - adi,ad7817
> + - adi,ad7818
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but is there a missing lock to
protect concurrent sysfs accesses?
Looking at ad7816_show_value() in drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7816.c:
drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7816.c:ad7816_show_value() {
...
ret = ad7816_spi_read(chip, &data);
...
}
Since this is called for world-readable sysfs attributes, can multiple
userspace processes trigger this concurrently?
If so, could concurrent execution of ad7816_spi_read() interleave GPIO pin
toggling and SPI transfers, corrupting the hardware state?
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does this code pass
stack-allocated buffers to SPI transfers?
Looking at drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7816.c:
drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7816.c:ad7816_spi_read() {
...
ret = spi_read(spi_dev, &buf, sizeof(*data));
...
}
And also in ad7816_spi_write():
drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7816.c:ad7816_spi_write() {
...
ret = spi_write(spi_dev, &data, sizeof(data));
...
}
Since the SPI subsystem often maps these buffers for DMA, will passing
variables from the stack cause mapping failures or crashes on architectures
with virtually mapped kernel stacks?
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but can this unbounded polling
loop cause a CPU lockup?
Looking at ad7816_spi_read() in drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7816.c:
drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7816.c:ad7816_spi_read() {
...
while (gpiod_get_value(chip->busy_pin))
cpu_relax();
...
}
If the external device malfunctions or the GPIO line gets permanently stuck
high, will this loop block indefinitely and cause a hard lockup?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260530135302.54688-1-tahanarimani3443@gmail.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-30 11:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-30 13:31 [PATCH] dt-bindings: iio: adc: Add schema for AD7816/7/8 digital temperature sensor Taha Narimani
2026-05-30 10:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-30 13:53 ` Taha Narimani
2026-05-30 11:06 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
[not found] ` <CAEsNvj8Q3n3-tuPhANfRjUfqrnCtzfguuRKL0OrwCEEkSXrUaw@mail.gmail.com>
2026-05-30 11:21 ` Taha Narimani
2026-05-30 14:58 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-05-30 23:11 ` Conor Dooley
2026-05-31 8:53 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260530110658.30EB11F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tahanarimani3443@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox