From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Maulik Shah" <maulik.shah@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: conor+dt@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] irqchip/qcom-pdc: Configure PDC to pass through mode
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 09:43:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260616094339.1919B1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260616-hamoa_pdc_v3-v3-5-4d8e1504ea75@oss.qualcomm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Read-Modify-Write (RMW) operations on `irq_cfg_reg` race with asynchronous hardware updates to the latched status bit, risking lost interrupts.
--
commit 5bfc60b86ecb20a923a4f052f469cb8a8237153f
Author: Maulik Shah <maulik.shah@oss.qualcomm.com>
irqchip/qcom-pdc: Configure PDC to pass through mode
This commit configures the PDC to pass through mode using an SCM write
access. If the write fails, it falls back to a secondary controller mode
where GPIO IRQs are latched at the PDC and sent to the GIC as level
interrupts.
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/qcom-pdc.c b/drivers/irqchip/qcom-pdc.c
> index 1aa6be42307ca..c6f2935ff7887 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/qcom-pdc.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/qcom-pdc.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -231,6 +260,30 @@ static void pdc_enable_intr_bank(int pin_out, bool on)
> pdc_reg_write(pdc->regs->irq_en_reg, index, enable);
> }
>
> +static void pdc_clear_gpio_cfg(int pin_out)
> +{
> + unsigned long gpio_sts;
> +
> + if (pdc->version < PDC_VERSION_3_0)
> + return;
> +
> + gpio_sts = pdc_reg_read(pdc->regs->irq_cfg_reg, pin_out);
> + __clear_bit(pdc->cfg_fields->gpio_irq_sts, &gpio_sts);
> + pdc_reg_write(pdc->regs->irq_cfg_reg, pin_out, gpio_sts);
> +}
> +
> +static void pdc_unmask_gpio_cfg(int pin_out, bool unmask)
> +{
> + unsigned long gpio_mask;
> +
> + if (pdc->version < PDC_VERSION_3_0)
> + return;
> +
> + gpio_mask = pdc_reg_read(pdc->regs->irq_cfg_reg, pin_out);
> + __assign_bit(pdc->cfg_fields->gpio_irq_mask, &gpio_mask, !unmask);
> + pdc_reg_write(pdc->regs->irq_cfg_reg, pin_out, gpio_mask);
[Severity: High]
Could this read-modify-write operation accidentally clear a pending interrupt?
Since pdc_clear_gpio_cfg() clears the hardware latch by setting gpio_irq_sts
to 0, it appears this is a Write-0-to-Clear (W0C) register bit.
If a new interrupt arrives and the hardware sets gpio_irq_sts to 1 right
after the read but before the write completes:
CPU
pdc_unmask_gpio_cfg()
gpio_mask = pdc_reg_read(...) // reads gpio_irq_sts as 0
Hardware
Interrupt arrives, sets gpio_irq_sts to 1
CPU
pdc_unmask_gpio_cfg()
pdc_reg_write(..., gpio_mask) // writes 0 back to gpio_irq_sts
Will this write of 0 inadvertently clear the newly latched interrupt before
it can be processed by the system?
> +}
> +
> static void pdc_enable_intr_cfg(int pin_out, bool on)
> {
> unsigned long enable = pdc_reg_read(pdc->regs->irq_cfg_reg, pin_out);
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260616-hamoa_pdc_v3-v3-0-4d8e1504ea75@oss.qualcomm.com?part=5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-16 9:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-16 9:25 [PATCH v3 0/8] x1e80100: Enable PDC wake GPIOs and deepest idle state Maulik Shah
2026-06-16 9:25 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] irqchip/qcom-pdc: restructure version support Maulik Shah
2026-06-16 9:25 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] irqchip/qcom-pdc: Move all statics to struct pdc_desc Maulik Shah
2026-06-16 9:25 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] irqchip/qcom-pdc: Remove pdc_enable_intr() wrapper Maulik Shah
2026-06-16 9:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 9:25 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] irqchip/qcom-pdc: Differentiate between direct SPI and GPIO as SPI Maulik Shah
2026-06-16 9:25 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] irqchip/qcom-pdc: Configure PDC to pass through mode Maulik Shah
2026-06-16 9:43 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-16 9:25 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] pinctrl: qcom: Acknowledge IRQs for PDC interrupt controller Maulik Shah
2026-06-16 9:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 9:25 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] Revert "pinctrl: qcom: x1e80100: Bypass PDC wakeup parent for now" Maulik Shah
2026-06-16 9:25 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] arm64: dts: qcom: x1e80100: Add deepest idle state Maulik Shah
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260616094339.1919B1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maulik.shah@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox