Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Santhosh Kumar K" <s-k6@ti.com>
Cc: conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 12/16] spi: cadence-quadspi: enable PHY for indirect writes
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2026 07:53:31 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260618075331.6ED831F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260618073725.84733-13-s-k6@ti.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:

New issues:
- [High] Enabling PHY after starting the indirect write operation guarantees a deadlock and hardware timeout, while the error path compounds the issue with a secondary timeout.

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Missing PHY disable cleanup when `cqspi_tune_phy(true)` fails during direct read.
--

commit 58e38b1c2aa32f1b8542b6e43dd5365e97bd7dce
Author: Santhosh Kumar K <s-k6@ti.com>
Subject: spi: cadence-quadspi: enable PHY for indirect writes

Enable PHY for indirect writes of at least CQSPI_PHY_MIN_INDIRECT_WRITE_LEN
bytes. PHY is activated only when tuning completed successfully and the
write op runs at the calibrated post-config frequency, matching the same
frequency guard used by the read path.

Thread max_speed_hz from cqspi_mem_process() through cqspi_write() into
cqspi_indirect_write_execute() for the frequency check.

> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c
> index 057381e56a7fd..f4cf97a909fc5 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -1073,13 +1242,15 @@ static int cqspi_write_setup(struct cqspi_flash_pdata *f_pdata,
>  
>  static int cqspi_indirect_write_execute(struct cqspi_flash_pdata *f_pdata,
>  					loff_t to_addr, const u8 *txbuf,
> -					const size_t n_tx)
> +					const size_t n_tx,
> +					u32 post_config_max_speed_hz)
>  {
>  	struct cqspi_st *cqspi = f_pdata->cqspi;
>  	struct device *dev = &cqspi->pdev->dev;
>  	void __iomem *reg_base = cqspi->iobase;
>  	unsigned int remaining = n_tx;
>  	unsigned int write_bytes;
> +	bool use_tuned_phy_write;
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	if (!refcount_read(&cqspi->refcount))

[ ... ]

> @@ -1115,6 +1286,18 @@ static int cqspi_indirect_write_execute(struct cqspi_flash_pdata *f_pdata,
>  	if (cqspi->apb_ahb_hazard)
>  		readl(reg_base + CQSPI_REG_INDIRECTWR);
>  
> +	/* Use PHY only for large writes at the calibrated rate */
> +	use_tuned_phy_write = n_tx >= CQSPI_PHY_MIN_INDIRECT_WRITE_LEN &&
> +			      f_pdata->use_tuned_phy &&
> +			      f_pdata->phy_write_op.max_freq ==
> +				      post_config_max_speed_hz;
> +
> +	if (use_tuned_phy_write) {
> +		ret = cqspi_tune_phy(f_pdata, true);
> +		if (ret)
> +			goto failwr;
> +	}

[Severity: High]
Does calling cqspi_tune_phy() here guarantee a timeout?

Since cqspi_tune_phy() internally calls cqspi_wait_idle(), and this is
executed after writing CQSPI_REG_INDIRECTWR_START_MASK to start the indirect
write controller, the controller is already busy waiting for data on the AHB
interface.

Will this cause cqspi_wait_idle() to deterministically poll for 500ms and
return -ETIMEDOUT?

>  	while (remaining > 0) {
>  		size_t write_words, mod_bytes;

[ ... ]

> @@ -1163,9 +1346,15 @@ static int cqspi_indirect_write_execute(struct cqspi_flash_pdata *f_pdata,
>  
>  	cqspi_wait_idle(cqspi);
>  
> +	if (use_tuned_phy_write)
> +		cqspi_tune_phy(f_pdata, false);
> +
>  	return 0;
>  
>  failwr:
> +	if (use_tuned_phy_write)
> +		cqspi_tune_phy(f_pdata, false);
> +

[Severity: High]
Could this error path cause a secondary timeout?

Since the indirect write operation is not yet canceled when cqspi_tune_phy()
is called, the controller is still busy.

When cqspi_tune_phy() calls cqspi_wait_idle(), wouldn't it time out again
for another 500ms before we write CQSPI_REG_INDIRECTWR_CANCEL_MASK below?

>  	/* Disable interrupt. */
>  	writel(0, reg_base + CQSPI_REG_IRQMASK);


This is a pre-existing issue, but I noticed a similar cleanup problem in
cqspi_direct_read_execute():

drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c:cqspi_direct_read_execute() {
    ...
	if (len_aligned) {
		ret = cqspi_tune_phy(f_pdata, true);
		if (ret)
			return ret;
		ret = cqspi_direct_read_dma(f_pdata, buf, from_aligned,
					    len_aligned);
		cqspi_tune_phy(f_pdata, false);
    ...
}

[Severity: High]
If cqspi_tune_phy(f_pdata, true) fails, it returns directly without calling
cqspi_tune_phy(f_pdata, false).

Since cqspi_tune_phy(true) modifies the hardware state by enabling the PHY
in CQSPI_REG_CONFIG and decrementing the read dummy cycles in
CQSPI_REG_RD_INSTR before checking for idle, doesn't returning here leave
the QSPI controller with the PHY partially enabled and an incorrect number
of dummy cycles?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260618073725.84733-1-s-k6@ti.com?part=12

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-18  7:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-18  7:37 [PATCH v4 00/16] spi: cadence-quadspi: add PHY tuning support Santhosh Kumar K
2026-06-18  7:37 ` [PATCH v4 01/16] spi: dt-bindings: add spi-max-post-config-frequency property Santhosh Kumar K
2026-06-18  7:37 ` [PATCH v4 02/16] spi: dt-bindings: add spi-phy-pattern-partition property Santhosh Kumar K
2026-06-18  7:50   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-18  7:37 ` [PATCH v4 03/16] spi: parse spi-max-post-config-frequency into post_config_max_speed_hz Santhosh Kumar K
2026-06-18  7:54   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-18  7:37 ` [PATCH v4 04/16] spi: spi-mem: teach spi_mem_adjust_op_freq() about post-config ops Santhosh Kumar K
2026-06-18  8:02   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-18  7:37 ` [PATCH v4 05/16] spi: spi-mem: add execute_tuning callback and spi_mem_execute_tuning() Santhosh Kumar K
2026-06-18  7:57   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-18  7:37 ` [PATCH v4 06/16] spi: cadence-quadspi: move cqspi_readdata_capture earlier Santhosh Kumar K
2026-06-18  7:48   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-18  7:37 ` [PATCH v4 07/16] spi: cadence-quadspi: add DQS support to read data capture Santhosh Kumar K
2026-06-18  7:37 ` [PATCH v4 08/16] spi: cadence-quadspi: add PHY tuning support Santhosh Kumar K
2026-06-18  7:59   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-18  7:37 ` [PATCH v4 09/16] spi: cadence-quadspi: skip DDR PHY tuning for 2-byte-address ops (i2383) Santhosh Kumar K
2026-06-18  8:04   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-18  7:37 ` [PATCH v4 10/16] spi: cadence-quadspi: refactor direct read path for PHY support Santhosh Kumar K
2026-06-18  7:57   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-18  7:37 ` [PATCH v4 11/16] spi: cadence-quadspi: enable PHY for direct reads Santhosh Kumar K
2026-06-18  7:53   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-18  7:37 ` [PATCH v4 12/16] spi: cadence-quadspi: enable PHY for indirect writes Santhosh Kumar K
2026-06-18  7:53   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-18  7:37 ` [PATCH v4 13/16] mtd: spinand: extract variant ranking logic into spinand_op_find_best() Santhosh Kumar K
2026-06-18  7:37 ` [PATCH v4 14/16] mtd: spinand: negotiate optimal PHY operating point before dirmap creation Santhosh Kumar K
2026-06-18  8:02   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-18  7:37 ` [PATCH v4 15/16] mtd: spi-nor: extract read op template construction into helper Santhosh Kumar K
2026-06-18  7:37 ` [PATCH v4 16/16] mtd: spi-nor: run PHY tuning after init and update dirmap frequency Santhosh Kumar K
2026-06-18  8:01   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260618075331.6ED831F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=s-k6@ti.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox