From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Jie Gan" <jie.gan@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/5] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8750: fix traceNoC probe issue
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2026 09:30:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260707093046.3D7C01F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260707-fix-tracenoc-probe-issue-v5-4-bf733ed9ebd0@oss.qualcomm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Switching the traceNoC device from the AMBA bus to the platform bus actively exposes a PM runtime / devres clock unbalance bug that triggers kernel WARNINGs on device unbind.
--
--- Patch [4]: [PATCH v5 4/5] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8750: fix traceNoC probe issue ---
commit 614093568676102a83b2efb2ba08c1718071ad73
Author: Jie Gan <jie.gan@oss.qualcomm.com>
arm64: dts: qcom: sm8750: fix traceNoC probe issue
This patch drops the "arm,primecell" compatible string from the traceNoC
node to prevent indefinite probe deferral. By using only the standalone
"qcom,coresight-tnoc" compatible, the device binds via the platform
bus instead of the AMBA bus, bypassing the primecell ID check.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8750.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8750.dtsi
> index fafed417c66fc..1e25be41aef5c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8750.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8750.dtsi
> @@ -4687,7 +4687,7 @@ tpdm_rdpm_cmb2_out: endpoint {
> };
>
> tn@109ab000 {
> - compatible = "qcom,coresight-tnoc", "arm,primecell";
> + compatible = "qcom,coresight-tnoc";
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does changing this to a
platform device expose a clock management unbalance during driver unbind?
When bound as a platform device, tnoc_platform_probe() acquires the clock
via devm_clk_get_optional_enabled() in coresight_get_enable_clocks(). This
queues a devres action to automatically disable the clock upon unbind.
If the device enters runtime suspend, tnoc_runtime_suspend() manually
disables this same clock:
drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tnoc.c:tnoc_runtime_suspend() {
...
clk_disable_unprepare(drvdata->pclk);
...
}
Unlike the AMBA bus framework which automatically wakes devices during
removal, tnoc_platform_remove() does not call pm_runtime_get_sync() before
disabling runtime PM.
If the driver is unbound while suspended, the device stays suspended and the
clock remains disabled. Once tnoc_platform_remove() returns, the devres
unwind process executes the cleanup action, calling clk_disable_unprepare()
a second time.
Will this sequence trigger kernel warnings in clk_core_disable() and
clk_core_unprepare() due to the counts already being zero?
> reg = <0x0 0x109ab000 0x0 0x4200>;
>
> clocks = <&aoss_qmp>;
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260707-fix-tracenoc-probe-issue-v5-0-bf733ed9ebd0@oss.qualcomm.com?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-07 9:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-07 9:08 [PATCH v5 0/5] Fix traceNoC probe issue on multiple QCOM platforms Jie Gan
2026-07-07 9:08 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] dt-bindings: arm: coresight-tnoc: Drop arm,primecell to bind on platform bus Jie Gan
2026-07-07 9:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 7:59 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-07-09 8:34 ` Jie Gan
2026-07-09 8:46 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-07-09 9:02 ` Jie Gan
2026-07-09 9:17 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-07-07 9:08 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] coresight: tnoc: Bind Aggregator TNOC on the " Jie Gan
2026-07-07 9:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-07 9:08 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] arm64: dts: qcom: kaanapali: fix traceNoC probe issue Jie Gan
2026-07-07 9:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-07 9:08 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8750: " Jie Gan
2026-07-07 9:30 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-07 9:08 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] arm64: dts: qcom: glymur: use Aggregator TNOC compatible Jie Gan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260707093046.3D7C01F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jie.gan@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox