From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Yu-Chun Lin" <eleanor.lin@realtek.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 02/11] reset: Add Realtek basic reset support
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2026 16:08:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260713160820.0594B1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260713155630.3054636-3-eleanor.lin@realtek.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] The Kconfig help text and commit message incorrectly claim the driver provides a registration helper function to extract the regmap and device tree node.
- [Low] Unnecessary inclusion of `<linux/device.h>` and `<linux/of.h>`.
--
--- Patch [2]: [PATCH v10 02/11] reset: Add Realtek basic reset support ---
commit 231fee7f5cf687d120e12d9c11d120d53d5aa54d
Author: Cheng-Yu Lee <cylee12@realtek.com>
reset: Add Realtek basic reset support
This commit defines reset operations backed by a regmap-based register
interface for Realtek SoCs. It exports the reset control operations to allow
callers to manually assign their own reset controller data structures.
> reset: Add Realtek basic reset support
>
> Define the reset operations backed by a regmap-based register interface
> and prepare the reset controller to be registered through the reset
> framework.
>
> Since the reset controllers on Realtek SoCs often share the same register
> space with the clock controllers, this common framework is designed to
> extract the regmap and device tree node from the parent device
> (e.g., an auxiliary device parent).
[Severity: Medium]
Is this description still accurate?
The changelog notes that in v10, the wrapper function was removed to allow
callers to assign the regmap, ops, dev, and of_node individually. It seems the
common framework no longer extracts the regmap and device tree node from the
parent device.
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/drivers/reset/realtek/Kconfig b/drivers/reset/realtek/Kconfig
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..bb6dd856a64a5
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/reset/realtek/Kconfig
> @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +config RESET_RTK_COMMON
> + tristate "Realtek common reset driver" if COMPILE_TEST
> + help
> + This option enables the common reset controller library for
> + Realtek SoCs. It provides shared reset control operations
> + (assert, deassert, status) and a registration helper function
> + that other Realtek-specific reset drivers can use.
[Severity: Medium]
Should the Kconfig help text be updated to reflect the v10 changes?
It explicitly claims a registration helper function is provided, which appears
to no longer be true since rtk_reset_ops is exported directly instead.
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/drivers/reset/realtek/reset-rtk-common.c b/drivers/reset/realtek/reset-rtk-common.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..4d5ec2b0416d1
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/reset/realtek/reset-rtk-common.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2019-2026 Realtek Semiconductor Corporation
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/export.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
[Severity: Low]
Since the registration helper function was removed, are linux/device.h and
linux/of.h still necessary?
It looks like these headers were used to interact with struct device and
of_node, and could now be safely dropped.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260713155630.3054636-1-eleanor.lin@realtek.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-13 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-13 15:56 [PATCH v10 00/11] clk / reset: realtek: Add RTD1625 clock and reset support Yu-Chun Lin
2026-07-13 15:56 ` [PATCH v10 01/11] dt-bindings: clock: Add Realtek RTD1625 Clock & Reset Controller Yu-Chun Lin
2026-07-13 15:56 ` [PATCH v10 02/11] reset: Add Realtek basic reset support Yu-Chun Lin
2026-07-13 16:08 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-13 15:56 ` [PATCH v10 03/11] reset: realtek: Add RTD1625 reset controller driver Yu-Chun Lin
2026-07-13 15:56 ` [PATCH v10 04/11] clk: realtek: Introduce a common probe() Yu-Chun Lin
2026-07-13 16:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-13 15:56 ` [PATCH v10 05/11] clk: realtek: Add support for phase locked loops (PLLs) Yu-Chun Lin
2026-07-13 16:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-13 15:56 ` [PATCH v10 06/11] clk: realtek: Add support for gate clock Yu-Chun Lin
2026-07-13 15:56 ` [PATCH v10 07/11] clk: realtek: Add support for mux clock Yu-Chun Lin
2026-07-13 15:56 ` [PATCH v10 08/11] clk: realtek: Add support for MMC-tuned PLL clocks Yu-Chun Lin
2026-07-13 16:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-13 15:56 ` [PATCH v10 09/11] clk: realtek: Add RTD1625-CRT clock controller driver Yu-Chun Lin
2026-07-13 15:56 ` [PATCH v10 10/11] clk: realtek: Add RTD1625-ISO " Yu-Chun Lin
2026-07-13 16:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-13 15:56 ` [PATCH v10 11/11] arm64: dts: realtek: Add clock support for RTD1625 Yu-Chun Lin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260713160820.0594B1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=eleanor.lin@realtek.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox