From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Santhosh Kumar K" <s-k6@ti.com>
Cc: "Miquel Raynal" <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
"Michael Walle" <mwalle@kernel.org>,
"Vignesh Raghavendra" <vigneshr@ti.com>,
"Takahiro Kuwano" <takahiro.kuwano@infineon.com>,
robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
"Richard Weinberger" <richard@nod.at>,
"Pratyush Yadav" <pratyush@kernel.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 12/18] spi: cadence-quadspi: enable PHY for indirect writes
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2026 17:32:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260825173258.DD6791F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260825171737.776052-13-s-k6@ti.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Missing verification of the current operation frequency (`op->max_freq`) against the calibrated PHY frequency, potentially causing the PHY to be incorrectly enabled for uncalibrated writes.
--
commit f08af848763cec6062f2de1a309900c45e4f895a
Author: Santhosh Kumar K <s-k6@ti.com>
spi: cadence-quadspi: enable PHY for indirect writes
This commit enables PHY for indirect writes of at least 1KB, restricting
PHY writes to NAND devices where a write op template was provided. It also
cancels the indirect write before disabling PHY in the error path to avoid
timeouts while the controller is still waiting for AHB data.
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c
> index d38a0253e4bda..20ece785c97a4 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1370,18 +1372,32 @@ static int cqspi_write_setup(struct cqspi_flash_pdata *f_pdata,
>
> static int cqspi_indirect_write_execute(struct cqspi_flash_pdata *f_pdata,
> loff_t to_addr, const u8 *txbuf,
> - const size_t n_tx)
> + const size_t n_tx,
> + u32 post_config_max_speed_hz)
> {
> struct cqspi_st *cqspi = f_pdata->cqspi;
> struct device *dev = &cqspi->pdev->dev;
> void __iomem *reg_base = cqspi->iobase;
> unsigned int remaining = n_tx;
> unsigned int write_bytes;
> + bool use_tuned_phy_write;
> int ret;
>
> if (!refcount_read(&cqspi->refcount))
> return -ENODEV;
>
> + /* Use PHY only for large writes at the calibrated rate */
> + use_tuned_phy_write = n_tx >= CQSPI_PHY_MIN_INDIRECT_WRITE_LEN &&
> + f_pdata->use_tuned_phy &&
> + f_pdata->phy_write_op.max_freq ==
> + post_config_max_speed_hz;
[Severity: High]
Does this logic correctly handle operations where the command-specific speed
limit (op->max_freq) is lower than post_config_max_speed_hz?
If a large indirect write is executed with an op->max_freq less than
post_config_max_speed_hz, the hardware clock will be lowered to op->max_freq.
However, this condition only checks the controller's post-configuration
maximum speed against the calibrated PHY frequency, completely omitting a
check against the actual frequency of the current SPI operation.
Could this lead to the PHY being incorrectly enabled using high-speed DLL
tuning values while operating at a lower clock speed? Applying DLL delay
values calibrated for a high clock speed to a lower clock speed could cause
the PHY data transmission eye to shift, potentially leading to incorrect
sampling and silent data corruption on flash writes.
The read path explicitly validates op->max_freq via cqspi_use_tuned_phy(),
should the write path perform a similar validation before enabling the PHY?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260825171737.776052-1-s-k6@ti.com?part=12
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-25 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-25 17:17 [PATCH v9 00/18] spi: cadence-quadspi: add PHY tuning support Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-25 17:17 ` [PATCH v9 01/18] spi: dt-bindings: add spi-max-post-config-frequency-hz property Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-25 17:17 ` [PATCH v9 02/18] spi: dt-bindings: add spi-phy-pattern-partition property Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-25 17:17 ` [PATCH v9 03/18] spi: parse spi-max-post-config-frequency-hz into post_config_max_speed_hz Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-25 17:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-25 17:17 ` [PATCH v9 04/18] spi: spi-mem: teach spi_mem_adjust_op_freq() about post-config ops Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-25 17:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-25 17:17 ` [PATCH v9 05/18] spi: spi-mem: add execute_tuning callback and spi_mem_execute_tuning() Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-25 17:17 ` [PATCH v9 06/18] spi: cadence-quadspi: move cqspi_readdata_capture earlier Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-25 17:17 ` [PATCH v9 07/18] spi: cadence-quadspi: add DQS support to read data capture Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-25 17:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-25 17:17 ` [PATCH v9 08/18] spi: cadence-quadspi: add PHY tuning support Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-25 17:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-26 21:43 ` Mark Brown
2026-08-25 17:17 ` [PATCH v9 09/18] spi: cadence-quadspi: skip DDR PHY tuning for 2-byte-address ops (i2383) Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-25 17:17 ` [PATCH v9 10/18] spi: cadence-quadspi: refactor direct read path for PHY support Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-25 17:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-25 17:17 ` [PATCH v9 11/18] spi: cadence-quadspi: enable PHY for direct reads Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-25 17:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-25 17:17 ` [PATCH v9 12/18] spi: cadence-quadspi: enable PHY for indirect writes Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-25 17:32 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-25 17:17 ` [PATCH v9 13/18] spi: cadence-quadspi: reprogram CS timing on every chip-select switch Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-25 17:17 ` [PATCH v9 14/18] spi: cadence-quadspi: reprogram PHY DLL on runtime resume Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-25 17:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-25 17:17 ` [PATCH v9 15/18] mtd: spinand: extract variant ranking logic into spinand_op_find_best_variant() Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-25 17:17 ` [PATCH v9 16/18] mtd: spinand: negotiate optimal controller operating point before dirmap creation Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-25 17:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-25 17:17 ` [PATCH v9 17/18] mtd: spi-nor: extract read op template construction into helper Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-25 17:17 ` [PATCH v9 18/18] mtd: spi-nor: run controller optimization before dirmap creation Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-25 17:45 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260825173258.DD6791F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=mwalle@kernel.org \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=s-k6@ti.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=takahiro.kuwano@infineon.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox