From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Santhosh Kumar K" <s-k6@ti.com>
Cc: "Pratyush Yadav" <pratyush@kernel.org>,
robh@kernel.org, "Miquel Raynal" <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
"Vignesh Raghavendra" <vigneshr@ti.com>,
"Michael Walle" <mwalle@kernel.org>,
conor+dt@kernel.org,
"Takahiro Kuwano" <takahiro.kuwano@infineon.com>,
"Richard Weinberger" <richard@nod.at>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 14/18] spi: cadence-quadspi: reprogram PHY DLL on runtime resume
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2026 17:36:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260825173607.158011F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260825171737.776052-15-s-k6@ti.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Critical] Disabling 'use_tuned_phy' on DLL resync failure bypasses the PHY DLL while continuing to run at high speed, causing silent data corruption.
- [Medium] Iteratively reprogramming the global PHY DLL for all chip selects on runtime resume causes redundant delays and overwrites state.
--
commit 9b2d8bb539c61392a12afe8d25c966ba88c70398
Author: Santhosh Kumar K <s-k6@ti.com>
spi: cadence-quadspi: reprogram PHY DLL on runtime resume
The PHY DLL loses its programmed delay values and lock when the OSPI
controller is power-gated during runtime suspend. On resume,
cqspi_controller_init() reinitialises the controller but does not
touch the PHY DLL registers, leaving the DLL in an unlocked state.
Any subsequent PHY read or write would then fail at the cqspi_resync_dll()
call inside cqspi_tune_phy().
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c
> index 530335f002fb4..94d67e8bcfbc4 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -4042,6 +4042,28 @@ static int cqspi_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
>
> cqspi->current_cs = -1;
> cqspi->sclk = 0;
> +
> + for (cs = 0; cs < CQSPI_MAX_CHIPSELECT; cs++) {
> + struct cqspi_flash_pdata *f_pdata = &cqspi->f_pdata[cs];
> +
> + if (!f_pdata->use_tuned_phy)
> + continue;
> +
> + cqspi_phy_set_dll_master(cqspi);
> +
> + cqspi_set_dll(cqspi->iobase, f_pdata->phy_setting.rx,
> + f_pdata->phy_setting.tx);
> + ret = cqspi_resync_dll(cqspi);
[Severity: Medium]
Will this iteratively reprogram the global PHY DLL for all chip selects on
runtime resume, causing redundant delays and overwriting state?
The PHY config register (CQSPI_REG_PHY_CONFIG) is global, yet the resume loop
iterates over all chip selects, writes each CS's RX/TX taps to the global
register, and triggers a full DLL resync each time. Because only the final
CS's taps remain active in hardware, the driver's cqspi_tune_phy() function
will redundantly re-sync the DLL again on the next transfer to any other chip
select, completely negating the purpose of pre-locking them during resume.
Furthermore, master DLL lock is independent of the slave RX/TX taps.
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_warn(dev, "cs%d: PHY DLL resync failed on resume: %d, disabling PHY\n",
> + cs, ret);
> + f_pdata->dll_locked = false;
> + f_pdata->use_tuned_phy = false;
[Severity: Critical]
Does disabling 'use_tuned_phy' here on DLL resync failure bypass the PHY DLL
while continuing to run at high speed, causing silent data corruption?
If the PHY DLL resync fails during resume, setting 'use_tuned_phy = false'
causes subsequent flash operations to bypass the PHY data capture logic.
However, the SPI clock frequency (op->max_freq) is not downgraded and
continues running at the high PHY-tuned speed (e.g., 150-200MHz). The
controller's non-PHY fallback cannot reliably sample data at these high
frequencies, resulting in garbage data being read from or written to the
flash.
> + } else {
> + f_pdata->dll_locked = true;
> + }
> + }
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260825171737.776052-1-s-k6@ti.com?part=14
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-25 17:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-25 17:17 [PATCH v9 00/18] spi: cadence-quadspi: add PHY tuning support Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-25 17:17 ` [PATCH v9 01/18] spi: dt-bindings: add spi-max-post-config-frequency-hz property Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-25 17:17 ` [PATCH v9 02/18] spi: dt-bindings: add spi-phy-pattern-partition property Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-25 17:17 ` [PATCH v9 03/18] spi: parse spi-max-post-config-frequency-hz into post_config_max_speed_hz Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-25 17:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-25 17:17 ` [PATCH v9 04/18] spi: spi-mem: teach spi_mem_adjust_op_freq() about post-config ops Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-25 17:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-25 17:17 ` [PATCH v9 05/18] spi: spi-mem: add execute_tuning callback and spi_mem_execute_tuning() Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-25 17:17 ` [PATCH v9 06/18] spi: cadence-quadspi: move cqspi_readdata_capture earlier Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-25 17:17 ` [PATCH v9 07/18] spi: cadence-quadspi: add DQS support to read data capture Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-25 17:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-25 17:17 ` [PATCH v9 08/18] spi: cadence-quadspi: add PHY tuning support Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-25 17:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-26 21:43 ` Mark Brown
2026-08-25 17:17 ` [PATCH v9 09/18] spi: cadence-quadspi: skip DDR PHY tuning for 2-byte-address ops (i2383) Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-25 17:17 ` [PATCH v9 10/18] spi: cadence-quadspi: refactor direct read path for PHY support Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-25 17:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-25 17:17 ` [PATCH v9 11/18] spi: cadence-quadspi: enable PHY for direct reads Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-25 17:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-25 17:17 ` [PATCH v9 12/18] spi: cadence-quadspi: enable PHY for indirect writes Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-25 17:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-25 17:17 ` [PATCH v9 13/18] spi: cadence-quadspi: reprogram CS timing on every chip-select switch Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-25 17:17 ` [PATCH v9 14/18] spi: cadence-quadspi: reprogram PHY DLL on runtime resume Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-25 17:36 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-25 17:17 ` [PATCH v9 15/18] mtd: spinand: extract variant ranking logic into spinand_op_find_best_variant() Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-25 17:17 ` [PATCH v9 16/18] mtd: spinand: negotiate optimal controller operating point before dirmap creation Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-25 17:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-25 17:17 ` [PATCH v9 17/18] mtd: spi-nor: extract read op template construction into helper Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-25 17:17 ` [PATCH v9 18/18] mtd: spi-nor: run controller optimization before dirmap creation Santhosh Kumar K
2026-08-25 17:45 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260825173607.158011F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=mwalle@kernel.org \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=s-k6@ti.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=takahiro.kuwano@infineon.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox