Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Billy Tsai" <billy_tsai@aspeedtech.com>
Cc: "Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
	Frank.Li@kernel.org, linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] i3c: mipi-i3c-hci: Improve AST2700 PIO TX queue utilization
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2026 11:51:20 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260901115121.622F71F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260901-b4-i3c-hci-ast2700-v1-7-19909e7cbd7e@aspeedtech.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Calling `of_device_is_compatible()` via the `is_aspeed()` helper inside the high-speed PIO TX data transfer loop causes severe CPU overhead and latency.
- [High] Hardware TOCTOU / Stale write pointer read leading to FIFO overflow.
--

commit 3be95193756af176407d7f4071b09a591d9a4eb3
Author: Billy Tsai <billy_tsai@aspeedtech.com>

i3c: mipi-i3c-hci: Improve AST2700 PIO TX queue utilization

This commit updates the MIPI I3C HCI driver to improve TX FIFO utilization
for the AST2700 controller. It introduces a vendor-specific check to poll
the exact number of free FIFO entries using hardware read/write pointers
instead of relying on a half-empty threshold.

> diff --git a/drivers/i3c/master/mipi-i3c-hci/pio.c b/drivers/i3c/master/mipi-i3c-hci/pio.c
> index 6bd5e43364a1d..3d70257dcc1dc 100644
> --- a/drivers/i3c/master/mipi-i3c-hci/pio.c
> +++ b/drivers/i3c/master/mipi-i3c-hci/pio.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -295,11 +296,23 @@ static bool hci_pio_do_tx(struct i3c_hci *hci, struct hci_pio_data *pio)
>  	p += (xfer->data_len - xfer->data_left) / 4;
>  
>  	while (xfer->data_left >= 4) {
> -		/* bail out if FIFO free space is below set threshold */
> -		if (!(pio_reg_read(INTR_STATUS) & STAT_TX_THLD))
> +		unsigned int avail = pio->tx_thresh_size;
> +
> +		if (is_aspeed(hci)) {

[Severity: High]
Does calling of_device_is_compatible() inside this fastpath byte-transfer
loop cause significant CPU overhead and latency?

Looking at is_aspeed() in vendor_aspeed.h, it parses the Device Tree and
performs string matching:

static inline bool is_aspeed(struct i3c_hci *hci)
{
	return of_device_is_compatible(hci->master.dev.of_node,
					"aspeed,ast2700-i3c-hci");
}

Since this executes repeatedly for every 4 bytes transferred, it might ruin
throughput, especially for non-Aspeed controllers where it gets evaluated
constantly. Would it be better to check compatibility exactly once during
probe and cache the result as a quirk flag?

> +			/*
> +			 * The vendor FIFO pointers give the exact free space,
> +			 * allowing better TX FIFO utilization than the
> +			 * threshold status.
> +			 */
> +			avail = aspeed_i3c_avail_tx_entries(hci);

[Severity: High]
Could this read of the hardware write pointer immediately after posting a
write lead to a FIFO overflow?

Memory-mapped I/O writes over buses like AHB/AXI are posted, and the
hardware controller might need a few clock cycles to commit the data and
update its pointers. 

If aspeed_i3c_avail_tx_entries() reads QUEUE_PTR0 before the hardware
increments the write pointer, won't avail remain artificially high?
If it does, the loop will immediately push another chunk of data,
potentially overflowing the 32-entry hardware FIFO. 

Should the driver locally track and deduct the number of words written from
the available space during the active transfer instead of re-polling the
hardware register?

> +			if (!avail)
> +				return false;
> +		} else if (!(pio_reg_read(INTR_STATUS) & STAT_TX_THLD)) {

[ ... ]

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260901-b4-i3c-hci-ast2700-v1-0-19909e7cbd7e@aspeedtech.com?part=7

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-01 11:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-01 11:35 [PATCH 0/8] i3c: mipi-i3c-hci: Add Aspeed AST2700 support Billy Tsai
2026-09-01 11:35 ` [PATCH 1/8] dt-bindings: i3c: Document the AST2700 I3C controller Billy Tsai
2026-09-01 20:41   ` Frank Li
2026-09-01 11:35 ` [PATCH 2/8] i3c: mipi-i3c-hci: Support address-indexed DAT slots Billy Tsai
2026-09-01 11:49   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 20:47   ` Frank Li
2026-09-01 11:35 ` [PATCH 3/8] i3c: mipi-i3c-hci: Add a quirk for 64-bit DMA addressing Billy Tsai
2026-09-01 11:55   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 20:51   ` Frank Li
2026-09-01 11:35 ` [PATCH 4/8] i3c: mipi-i3c-hci: Add a quirk to clear the TX start threshold Billy Tsai
2026-09-01 11:49   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 20:58   ` Frank Li
2026-09-01 11:35 ` [PATCH 5/8] i3c: mipi-i3c-hci: Add support for the AST2700 I3C controller Billy Tsai
2026-09-01 11:52   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 21:18   ` Frank Li
2026-09-01 11:35 ` [PATCH 6/8] i3c: mipi-i3c-hci: Program AST2700 IBI termination threshold Billy Tsai
2026-09-01 11:35 ` [PATCH 7/8] i3c: mipi-i3c-hci: Improve AST2700 PIO TX queue utilization Billy Tsai
2026-09-01 11:51   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-01 11:35 ` [PATCH 8/8] i3c: mipi-i3c-hci: Support the AST2700 internal pull-ups Billy Tsai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260901115121.622F71F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=billy_tsai@aspeedtech.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox