From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Stefano Radaelli" <stefano.radaelli21@gmail.com>
Cc: conor+dt@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, Frank.Li@kernel.org,
imx@lists.linux.dev, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] arm64: dts: imx8mm-var-dart: add TPM support
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2026 15:50:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260917155033.C43521F00899@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57aacae2f4f57e877ba32d8082915d6d6bcd3803.1789659585.git.stefano.r@variscite.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] dts: incorrect reset-gpios polarity contradicts hardware description
--
commit 3fe00f46f78811d6ed3d86dcccba4b6f6cd29139
Author: Stefano Radaelli <stefano.r@variscite.com>
arm64: dts: imx8mm-var-dart: add TPM support
This commit adds device tree support for the TPM module available on the
Variscite DART-MX8M-MINI SOM.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-var-dart.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-var-dart.dtsi
> index c7a9eb23e5e88..953950e55bf99 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-var-dart.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-var-dart.dtsi
> @@ -138,6 +138,16 @@ &i2c1 {
> sda-gpios = <&gpio5 15 (GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH | GPIO_OPEN_DRAIN)>;
> status = "okay";
>
> + st33ktpm2xi2c_som: tpm@2e {
> + compatible = "st,st33ktpm2xi2c", "tcg,tpm-tis-i2c";
> + reg = <0x2e>;
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_tpm_reset>;
> + label = "tpm";
> + /* active-low TPM reset line. */
> + reset-gpios = <&gpio4 31 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
[Severity: Low]
Does the device tree polarity match the actual hardware description here? The
GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH flag directly contradicts the inline comment that the
physical line is active-low. Standard device tree practice requires the
logical flag to match the physical active state (GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW).
If this property is parsed by a bootloader (like U-Boot) or a future Linux
driver update, wouldn't the reset line be driven to the wrong polarity (high
for reset, low for de-assert), potentially holding the TPM in reset and
breaking device initialization?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/cover.1789659585.git.stefano.r@variscite.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-17 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-17 15:41 [PATCH v2 0/3] arm64: dts: imx8mm-var-dart: update SoM support Stefano Radaelli
2026-09-17 15:41 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] arm64: dts: imx8mm-var-dart: configure SAI3 synchronous RX mode Stefano Radaelli
2026-09-17 15:41 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] arm64: dts: imx8mm-var-dart: add TPM support Stefano Radaelli
2026-09-17 15:50 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-17 18:51 ` Frank Li
2026-09-17 19:14 ` Stefano Radaelli
2026-09-17 19:52 ` Frank Li
2026-09-17 15:41 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: dts: imx8mm-var-dart: increase PHY reset deassert delay Stefano Radaelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260917155033.C43521F00899@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=stefano.radaelli21@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox