From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ariana Lazar" <ariana.lazar@microchip.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 03/11] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: use field_get() instead of custom dynamic macros
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 09:17:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260918091713.201A31F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260918-mcp47feb02_refactor-v7-3-82ca794eafe2@microchip.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] iio: dac: unused macro MCP47FEB02_DAC_CTRL_MASK left behind
--
commit d3bd49e7115fae14b0ecbbde0aa73b674836dfd2
Author: Ariana Lazar <ariana.lazar@microchip.com>
iio: dac: mcp47feb02: use field_get() instead of custom dynamic macros
This commit replaces manual bit operations for selecting channel-specific
bits with the field_get() macro in mcp47feb02_init_ctrl_regs().
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260913224339.490d89ba@jic23-hlaptop/
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/dac/mcp47feb02.c b/drivers/iio/dac/mcp47feb02.c
> index 1b1a4972f7719..d910a6cf9718d 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/dac/mcp47feb02.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/dac/mcp47feb02.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1024,7 +1024,7 @@ static int mcp47feb02_init_ctrl_regs(struct mcp47feb02_data *data)
> return ret;
> data->chdata[i].dac_data = dac_val;
>
> - data->chdata[i].ref_mode = (vref_ch >> (2 * i)) & MCP47FEB02_DAC_CTRL_MASK;
> + data->chdata[i].ref_mode = field_get(DAC_CTRL_MASK(i), vref_ch);
[Severity: Low]
Does this change leave behind MCP47FEB02_DAC_CTRL_MASK as unused dead code?
Since this patch replaces all instances of MCP47FEB02_DAC_CTRL_MASK, should
the original definition be removed from the file to prevent code clutter?
drivers/iio/dac/mcp47feb02.c:
#define MCP47FEB02_DAC_CTRL_MASK GENMASK(1, 0)
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260918-mcp47feb02_refactor-v7-0-82ca794eafe2@microchip.com?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-18 9:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-18 9:06 [PATCH v7 00/11] Refactor Microchip MCP47FEB02 I2C driver in separate modules to add support for MCP48FEB02 SPI driver Ariana Lazar
2026-09-18 9:06 ` [PATCH v7 01/11] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: initialize dac_data field in channel data struct at probe Ariana Lazar
2026-09-18 9:48 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-09-18 9:06 ` [PATCH v7 02/11] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: Fix gain field initialization for active channels Ariana Lazar
2026-09-18 9:48 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-09-18 9:06 ` [PATCH v7 03/11] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: use field_get() instead of custom dynamic macros Ariana Lazar
2026-09-18 9:17 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-18 9:46 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-09-20 18:44 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-18 9:06 ` [PATCH v7 04/11] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: Return len when disabling EEPROM store Ariana Lazar
2026-09-18 9:49 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-09-18 9:06 ` [PATCH v7 05/11] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: Increase EEPROM Programming Write Cycle Time Ariana Lazar
2026-09-18 9:49 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-09-18 9:06 ` [PATCH v7 06/11] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: Avoid unjustified probe error on missing label Ariana Lazar
2026-09-18 9:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 9:50 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-09-20 22:52 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-18 9:06 ` [PATCH v7 07/11] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: correct typo from a comment Ariana Lazar
2026-09-18 9:51 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-09-18 9:06 ` [PATCH v7 08/11] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: use field_prep() instead of custom dynamic macros Ariana Lazar
2026-09-18 9:06 ` [PATCH v7 09/11] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: refactor MCP47FEB02 I2C driver into two modules Ariana Lazar
2026-09-18 9:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-20 22:52 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-18 9:06 ` [PATCH v7 10/11] dt-bindings: iio: dac: add support for MCP48FEB02 SPI Ariana Lazar
2026-09-18 9:06 ` [PATCH v7 11/11] iio: dac: add support for Microchip MCP48FEB02 Ariana Lazar
2026-09-18 9:52 ` [PATCH v7 00/11] Refactor Microchip MCP47FEB02 I2C driver in separate modules to add support for MCP48FEB02 SPI driver Andy Shevchenko
2026-09-20 23:08 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-21 14:16 ` Ariana.Lazar
2026-09-21 23:56 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260918091713.201A31F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=ariana.lazar@microchip.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox