Re: [PATCH v7 00/11] Refactor Microchip MCP47FEB02 I2C driver in separate modules to add support for MCP48FEB02 SPI driver

[Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>]

On Fri, 18 Sep 2026 12:52:53 +0300
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 18, 2026 at 12:06:26PM +0300, Ariana Lazar wrote:
> > Refactor I2C driver implementation into separate modules in order to add
> > support for SPI MCP48FxBy1/2/4/8 DAC family on top of the I2C
> > implementation. The I2C and SPI devices have the same memory map and
> > supported functionalities.  
> 
> Jonathan, can you pick up the fixes from the series, please?
> It will reduce a burden a lot (yeah, I know that it might mess with
> Sashiko, but wouldn't simple delay fix this, I mean to give Sashiko
> a time it needs and then update the branch?).
> 
I'm not sure sashiko ever looks beyond mainline and given recent general
comments from Linus about only sending him late cycle fixes for stuff
that went wrong this cycle or is a major issue (which I've been interpreting
 as applying after rc4) I'm not thinking these fixes will go upstream before
 the merge window.  I don't mind applying them to the togreg branch now but
that isn't currently picked up by sashiko.

My biggest current issue with these bots is they make the workflow
of nibbling away at patch sets like I traditionally did not work
so well.  One option is to just send the whole series but edit
the titles to say they are already applied?  Hopefully that
lets reviewers jump over them or even maybe filter them out?

Anyhow, let me queue some of these.  I doubt we'll see anything new
from sashiko given the minor tweaks the rest of this series.

So with that in mind, applied patches in this order
1 2 4 5
held 6 back for the thing about checking if property present.
3 7 8 with link dropped.

So just 6 9 and 10 for next version please.

All the above on the testing branch of iio.git.

Thanks,

Jonathan