Re: [PATCH 1/5] dt-bindings: sram: Document IMEM found in Qualcomm's IPQ9574 and IPQ5332

[sashiko-bot@kernel.org]

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] dt-bindings: sram: compatible strings not sorted alphabetically
--

commit be343d0f902aa8be0dcbad3550c7127521779814
Author: Kathiravan Thirumoorthy <kathiravan.thirumoorthy@oss.qualcomm.com>

dt-bindings: sram: Document IMEM found in Qualcomm's IPQ9574 and IPQ5332

This commit documents the compatible strings for the IMEM found in the 
Qualcomm IPQ9574 and IPQ5332 SoCs.

> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/sram.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/sram.yaml
> index 6ee0b14647222..d65696885e6a5 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/sram.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/sram.yaml
> @@ -37,6 +37,8 @@ properties:
>          - qcom,eliza-imem
>          - qcom,glymur-imem
>          - qcom,hawi-imem
> +        - qcom,ipq9574-imem
> +        - qcom,ipq5332-imem
>          - qcom,ipq5424-imem

[Severity: Low]
This isn't a bug, but does this addition break the alphabetical sorting of
the compatible string list?

Placing qcom,ipq9574-imem and qcom,ipq5332-imem directly above 
qcom,ipq5424-imem results in ipq9574 appearing before ipq5332 and ipq5424,
which seems to violate the expected alphabetical sort order.

>          - qcom,kaanapali-imem
>          - qcom,maili-imem

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261001-imem_restart_reason-v1-0-79f516906010@oss.qualcomm.com?part=1