Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] arm64: dts: qcom: Enable USB controllers on Shikra IQS platform

[Krishna Kurapati <krishna.kurapati@oss.qualcomm.com>]

On 7/16/2026 11:10 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 7/16/26 6:29 PM, Krishna Kurapati wrote:
>> Enable both usb controllers in device mode on Shikra IQS platform.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krishna Kurapati <krishna.kurapati@oss.qualcomm.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/shikra-iqs-evk.dts | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/shikra-iqs-evk.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/shikra-iqs-evk.dts
>> index 3003a47bd759..2d4e34ec3b82 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/shikra-iqs-evk.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/shikra-iqs-evk.dts
>> @@ -38,3 +38,38 @@ &sdhc_1 {
>>   
>>   	status = "okay";
>>   };
>> +
>> +&usb_1 {
>> +	dr_mode = "peripheral";
> 
> Why does this one have to be peripheral if the other boards are otg?
> 

Actually I missed adding dr_mode as peripheral for other boards. I put 
in commit message that I want them to work in device mode but missed 
adding dr_mode property. Since the default behavior is peripheral mode, 
i saw no functional issue while testing. Shall I send v2 with either 
removing dr mode here in iqs or adding it in cqs/cqm ?

> [...]
> 
>> +&usb_2 {
>> +	dr_mode = "peripheral";
>> +
>> +	status = "okay";
> 
> And why do the other boards lack the secondary USB?
As mentioned in cover letter, on pure upstream build, I validated both 
controllers on iqs platform and only primary controller on cqs/cqm 
platform on a remote access setup.

Regards,
Krishna,