From: "Kathpalia, Tanmay" <tanmay.kathpalia@altera.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, ulf.hansson@linaro.org,
Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/9] arm64: dts: agilex5: add Cadence SD6HC controller and SOCDK enablement
Date: Thu, 21 May 2026 23:26:45 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5401fcc1-c89d-41e5-9df2-460e4d7a4ad8@altera.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260515-tuscan-spider-of-realization-ffafdf@quoll>
Hi K
Thanks for your feedback.
On 5/15/2026 2:08 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 01:21:25PM -0700, Tanmay Kathpalia wrote:
>> The Agilex5 SoC device tree gains an SD/MMC controller node backed by
>> the Cadence SD6HC, with IOMMU integration via the system SMMU. Card
>> power is supplied by a fixed 3.3V regulator and I/O voltage switching
>> between 1.8V and 3.3V is handled by a GPIO-controlled regulator.
>>
>> The SOCDK board enables the controller for SD-only operation in 4-bit
>> bus width with high-speed and SDR104 UHS-I modes at 200 MHz maximum
>> clock. SDHCI capability overrides clear the SDR50 tuning flag and
>> override the clock base mask to report 200 MHz.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tanmay Kathpalia <tanmay.kathpalia@altera.com>
>> ---
>> .../arm64/boot/dts/intel/socfpga_agilex5.dtsi | 38 +++++++++++++++++++
>> .../boot/dts/intel/socfpga_agilex5_socdk.dts | 26 +++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 64 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/intel/socfpga_agilex5.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/intel/socfpga_agilex5.dtsi
>> index 352c96d144a8..7e080f13166f 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/intel/socfpga_agilex5.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/intel/socfpga_agilex5.dtsi
>> @@ -300,6 +300,44 @@ portb: gpio-controller@0 {
>> };
>> };
>>
>> + sd_emmc_power: regulator-fixed-3p3v {
> NAK, this fails basic rules of organizing DTS/DTSI and the nodes. This
> is simple-bus, so how could you have here a regulator which is non MMIO?
>
> Plus, explain me how these regulators managed to appear on the SoC
> die/silicon?
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Apologies, you are right on both counts.
In v2 this will be fixed:
1. sd_emmc_power and sd_io_1v8_reg will be moved to the root level
of socfpga_agilex5_socdk.dts where they belong.
2. emmc_io_1v8_reg will be moved to the root level of
socfpga_agilex5_socdk_emmc.dts.
3. The shared socfpga_agilex5.dtsi will carry only the SoC-level
emmc controller node with no board-specific regulators.
Regards,
Tanmay
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-21 17:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20260511202132.5597-1-tanmay.kathpalia@altera.com>
2026-05-11 20:21 ` [PATCH v1 1/9] dt-bindings: reset: altr: add COMBOPHY_RESET for Agilex5 Tanmay Kathpalia
2026-05-12 17:33 ` Conor Dooley
2026-06-18 10:48 ` Philipp Zabel
2026-05-11 20:21 ` [PATCH v1 2/9] dt-bindings: mmc: cdns,sdhci: add SD6HC support and PHY properties Tanmay Kathpalia
2026-05-12 17:33 ` Conor Dooley
2026-05-13 0:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-11 20:21 ` [PATCH v1 3/9] arm64: dts: agilex5: add Cadence SD6HC controller and SOCDK enablement Tanmay Kathpalia
2026-05-13 0:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-13 6:34 ` Kathpalia, Tanmay
2026-05-15 8:38 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-05-21 17:56 ` Kathpalia, Tanmay [this message]
2026-05-11 20:21 ` [PATCH v1 4/9] dt-bindings: arm: intel: add Agilex5 SOCDK eMMC board variant Tanmay Kathpalia
2026-05-11 20:21 ` [PATCH v1 5/9] arm64: dts: agilex5: add SOCDK eMMC daughter board support Tanmay Kathpalia
2026-05-13 1:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-13 6:25 ` Kathpalia, Tanmay
2026-05-15 8:37 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-05-22 6:30 ` Kathpalia, Tanmay
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5401fcc1-c89d-41e5-9df2-460e4d7a4ad8@altera.com \
--to=tanmay.kathpalia@altera.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dinguyen@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox