Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frank Li <Frank.li@nxp.com>
To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Manikandan Muralidharan <manikandan.m@microchip.com>,
	conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/5] i3c: mipi-i3c-hci: add microchip sama7d65 SoC compatible with the required quirk
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2026 12:57:44 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ah8LiLPXssB5VYjm@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260525102331.8AE921F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org>

On Mon, May 25, 2026 at 10:23:31AM +0000, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
> - [High] Reusing AMD-specific hardcoded timing quirks for a Microchip SoC will result in incorrect I3C bus frequencies.
> --
>
> commit 8dab9b9edc49c0214800ec48372900ae0b5bbae4
> Author: Manikandan Muralidharan <manikandan.m@microchip.com>
>
> i3c: mipi-i3c-hci: add microchip sama7d65 SoC compatible with the required quirk
>
> This commit adds support for the Microchip sama7d65 SoC I3C HCI master IP.
> It introduces clock acquisition during probe and applies specific quirks
> to the new compatible string.
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/i3c/master/mipi-i3c-hci/core.c b/drivers/i3c/master/mipi-i3c-hci/core.c
> > index b781dbed21650..4cdf2abd42197 100644
> > --- a/drivers/i3c/master/mipi-i3c-hci/core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/i3c/master/mipi-i3c-hci/core.c
> [ ... ]
> > @@ -969,6 +970,7 @@ static int i3c_hci_init(struct i3c_hci *hci)
> >  static int i3c_hci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  {
> >  	const struct mipi_i3c_hci_platform_data *pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;
> > +	struct clk_bulk_data *clks;
> >  	struct i3c_hci *hci;
> >  	int irq, ret;
> [ ... ]
> > @@ -1001,6 +1003,11 @@ static int i3c_hci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  	if (!hci->quirks && platform_get_device_id(pdev))
> >  		hci->quirks = platform_get_device_id(pdev)->driver_data;
> >
> > +	ret = devm_clk_bulk_get_all_enabled(&pdev->dev, &clks);
> > +	if (ret < 0)
> > +		return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret,
> > +				     "Failed to get clocks\n");
> > +
> >  	ret = i3c_hci_init(hci);
> [ ... ]
> > @@ -1031,6 +1038,9 @@ static void i3c_hci_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >
> >  static const __maybe_unused struct of_device_id i3c_hci_of_match[] = {
> >  	{ .compatible = "mipi-i3c-hci", },
> > +	{ .compatible = "microchip,sama7d65-i3c-hci",
> > +	  .data = (void *)(ulong)(HCI_QUIRK_PIO_MODE | HCI_QUIRK_OD_PP_TIMING |
> > +				  HCI_QUIRK_RESP_BUF_THLD) },
>
> [Severity: High]
> Will applying HCI_QUIRK_OD_PP_TIMING to this Microchip SoC result in
> incorrect I3C bus frequencies?
>
> This quirk typically invokes amd_set_od_pp_timing(), which writes hardcoded
> timing divisors (0x00cf00cf for Open Drain and 0x00160016 for Push-Pull) to
> the controller's vendor-specific registers. These fixed values were
> calculated for a 9MHz I3C bus frequency assuming an AMD platform's specific
> fixed input clock of roughly 400 MHz.

Look like make sense. Is it true?

Frank
>
> Since the Microchip SoC acquires its clocks dynamically via
> devm_clk_bulk_get_all_enabled() as seen above, its input clock rate could
> differ and vary based on the system's clock tree configuration.
>
> Should these timing divisors be calculated dynamically against the actual
> input clock rate obtained from the clock framework rather than blindly
> reusing the fixed AMD divisors?
>
> >  	{},
> >  };
> >  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, i3c_hci_of_match);
>
> --
> Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260525092405.1514213-1-manikandan.m@microchip.com?part=3

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-02 16:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-25  9:24 [PATCH v7 0/5] Add microchip sama7d65 SoC I3C support Manikandan Muralidharan
2026-05-25  9:24 ` [PATCH v7 1/5] dt-bindings: i3c: mipi-i3c-hci: add Microchip SAMA7D65 compatible Manikandan Muralidharan
2026-05-25  9:24 ` [PATCH v7 2/5] clk: at91: sama7d65: add peripheral clock for I3C Manikandan Muralidharan
2026-05-31 14:50   ` Claudiu Beznea
2026-05-25  9:24 ` [PATCH v7 3/5] i3c: mipi-i3c-hci: add microchip sama7d65 SoC compatible with the required quirk Manikandan Muralidharan
2026-05-25 10:23   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-02 16:57     ` Frank Li [this message]
2026-06-04 10:53       ` Manikandan.M
2026-06-08 17:04   ` Frank Li
2026-05-25  9:24 ` [PATCH v7 4/5] ARM: dts: microchip: add I3C controller Manikandan Muralidharan
2026-05-25 10:30   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-25  9:24 ` [PATCH v7 5/5] ARM: configs: at91: sama7: add sama7d65 i3c-hci Manikandan Muralidharan
2026-06-07 12:19 ` [PATCH v7 0/5] Add microchip sama7d65 SoC I3C support Claudiu Beznea
2026-06-14 20:39 ` (subset) " Alexandre Belloni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ah8LiLPXssB5VYjm@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810 \
    --to=frank.li@nxp.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=manikandan.m@microchip.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox