[PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: mfd: mxs-lradc: Fix interrupt order

[PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: mfd: mxs-lradc: Fix interrupt order

[Fabio Estevam]

The interrupt descriptions added during the conversion to YAML do not
match the ICOLL source numbers used by the existing DTS files.

For i.MX23, Table 5-1 of the reference manual maps source 36 to touch
detection and sources 37 through 44 to channels 0 through 7. imx23.dtsi
lists these sources in that order.

For i.MX28, Table 5-1 maps source 10 to touch detection, sources 14 and
15 to the threshold interrupts, sources 16 through 23 to channels 0
through 7, and sources 24 and 25 to buttons 0 and 1. imx28.dtsi also
lists these sources in that order.

Reorder the schema descriptions to match the hardware documentation and
the existing DT ABI.

Fixes: 009528b5aa13 ("dt-bindings: mfd: convert mxs-lradc bindings to json-schema")
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
---
Changes since v1:
- Newly introduced.

 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/mxs-lradc.yaml | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/mxs-lradc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/mxs-lradc.yaml
index 782b2f4005a0..755029880677 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/mxs-lradc.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/mxs-lradc.yaml
@@ -87,13 +87,13 @@ then:
   properties:
     interrupts:
       items:
+        - description: touchscreen
         - description: channel 0
         - description: channel 1
         - description: channel 2
         - description: channel 3
         - description: channel 4
         - description: channel 5
-        - description: touchscreen
         - description: channel 6
         - description: channel 7
     fsl,lradc-touchscreen-wires:
@@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ else:
   properties:
     interrupts:
       items:
+        - description: touchscreen
         - description: threshold 0
         - description: threshold 1
         - description: channel 0
@@ -110,11 +111,10 @@ else:
         - description: channel 3
         - description: channel 4
         - description: channel 5
-        - description: button 0
-        - description: button 1
-        - description: touchscreen
         - description: channel 6
         - description: channel 7
+        - description: button 0
+        - description: button 1
 
 additionalProperties: false
 
-- 
2.43.0

[PATCH v2 2/2] mfd: mxs-lradc: Pass parent IRQs to child drivers

[Fabio Estevam]

The MFD driver stores raw DT interrupt indices in IRQ resources but
registers its child devices without an IRQ domain or IRQ base. The child
drivers consequently receive the indices as if they were mapped Linux
IRQ numbers. IRQ index 0 triggers the platform_get_irq_byname() warning:

  0 is an invalid IRQ number

The children then try to recover the indices from their resources and
map them against the parent OF node. Besides duplicating IRQ names in
the parent and children, this relies on invalid platform IRQ resources
and fails when IRQ 0 is rejected.

Resolve the interrupts with platform_get_irq() in the MFD parent and
store the mapped IRQs in the shared LRADC data. Drop the child IRQ
resources and duplicated name arrays, and have both child drivers
request the mapped IRQs directly. Use the MFD memory base support to
translate a single relative memory resource shared by both cells.

Tested on an i.MX28 EVK. The mxs-lradc-ts driver probes successfully,
touch events are reported, and the touch-detect and LRADC channel 7
interrupt counters increase as expected.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Suggested-by: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-input/CAOMZO5CgTzo6GuXptD4mFTN=UsJJqpkixDW1Q64gqZGrij8+uQ@mail.gmail.com/
Fixes: a85a6c86c25b ("driver core: platform: Clarify that IRQ 0 is invalid")
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
---
Changes since v1:
- Rework the IRQ handling as suggested by Lee Jones:
  - Replace the per-probe resource copying and mutation with parent-owned
    mapped IRQ arrays;
  - Remove the static IRQ resources and duplicated IRQ-name arrays;
  - Resolve IRQs in the MFD parent using platform_get_irq();
  - Have the child drivers request the mapped IRQs directly;
  - Collapse the per-SoC MFD cell arrays into a single const array;
  - Pass the parent memory resource through the MFD mem_base argument.
- Add a preceding DT binding patch correcting the documented interrupt
  order
 
This is a long-standing bug that I reported in 2020:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-input/CAOMZO5CgTzo6GuXptD4mFTN=UsJJqpkixDW1Q64gqZGrij8+uQ@mail.gmail.com/

This patch touches MFD, IIO, and Input. Since the IRQ mapping is moved
into the MFD parent, I suggest merging it through the MFD tree, with
acks from the IIO and Input maintainers.

The full backtrace:

[   10.540505] WARNING: drivers/base/platform.c:492 at __platform_get_irq_byname+0xb4/0xcc, CPU#0: swapper/0/1
[   10.555516] 0 is an invalid IRQ number
[   10.559627] Modules linked in:
[   10.562849] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 7.3.0-rc7-next-20261016-00003-g36062817a968 #17 VOLUNTARY
[   10.573732] Hardware name: Freescale MXS (Device Tree)
[   10.578934] Call trace:
[   10.578992]  unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x10/0x14
[   10.586955]  show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x48/0x64
[   10.592170]  dump_stack_lvl from __warn+0x8c/0x190
[   10.597114]  __warn from warn_slowpath_fmt+0x94/0xcc
[   10.602232]  warn_slowpath_fmt from __platform_get_irq_byname+0xb4/0xcc
[   10.609027]  __platform_get_irq_byname from platform_get_irq_byname+0x10/0x30
[   10.616337]  platform_get_irq_byname from mxs_lradc_ts_probe+0x18c/0x378
[   10.623247]  mxs_lradc_ts_probe from platform_probe+0x58/0x90
[   10.629174]  platform_probe from really_probe+0xc4/0x2cc
[   10.634649]  really_probe from __driver_probe_device+0xa0/0x1e0
[   10.640721]  __driver_probe_device from driver_probe_device+0x30/0xc0
[   10.647315]  driver_probe_device from __driver_attach+0x94/0x158
[   10.653466]  __driver_attach from bus_for_each_dev+0x7c/0xd0
[   10.659280]  bus_for_each_dev from bus_add_driver+0x158/0x1fc
[   10.665169]  bus_add_driver from driver_register+0x7c/0x114
[   10.670901]  driver_register from do_one_initcall+0x60/0x294
[   10.676721]  do_one_initcall from kernel_init_freeable+0x19c/0x24c
[   10.683073]  kernel_init_freeable from kernel_init+0x14/0x10c
[   10.688997]  kernel_init from ret_from_fork+0x14/0x38
[   10.694200] Exception stack(0xc8819fb0 to 0xc8819ff8)
[   10.699335] 9fa0:                                     00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
[   10.707591] 9fc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
[   10.715843] 9fe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000
[   10.723117] irq event stamp: 146363
[   10.726729] hardirqs last  enabled at (146367): [<c00adbd8>] __nbcon_atomic_flush_pending_con+0x120/0x1c0
[   10.736770] hardirqs last disabled at (146372): [<c0008f38>] __irq_svc+0x58/0xb0
[   10.744618] softirqs last  enabled at (146362): [<c0032c20>] __irq_exit_rcu+0x148/0x1d4
[   10.753153] softirqs last disabled at (146385): [<c0032c20>] __irq_exit_rcu+0x148/0x1d4
[   10.761603] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
[   10.766374] mxs-lradc-ts mxs-lradc-ts: error -EINVAL: IRQ mxs-lradc-touchscreen not found
[   10.766456] mxs-lradc-ts mxs-lradc-ts: probe with driver mxs-lradc-ts failed with error -22

 drivers/iio/adc/mxs-lradc-adc.c          |  43 +-----
 drivers/input/touchscreen/mxs-lradc-ts.c |  24 +---
 drivers/mfd/mxs-lradc.c                  | 172 ++++++++++++-----------
 include/linux/mfd/mxs-lradc.h            |  10 ++
 4 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 142 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/mxs-lradc-adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/mxs-lradc-adc.c
index dda5182a5076..1222997649f4 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/adc/mxs-lradc-adc.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/adc/mxs-lradc-adc.c
@@ -17,7 +17,6 @@
 #include <linux/mfd/core.h>
 #include <linux/mfd/mxs-lradc.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
-#include <linux/of_irq.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
 #include <linux/sysfs.h>
 
@@ -39,28 +38,6 @@
 
 #define VREF_MV_BASE 1850
 
-static const char *mx23_lradc_adc_irq_names[] = {
-	"mxs-lradc-channel0",
-	"mxs-lradc-channel1",
-	"mxs-lradc-channel2",
-	"mxs-lradc-channel3",
-	"mxs-lradc-channel4",
-	"mxs-lradc-channel5",
-};
-
-static const char *mx28_lradc_adc_irq_names[] = {
-	"mxs-lradc-thresh0",
-	"mxs-lradc-thresh1",
-	"mxs-lradc-channel0",
-	"mxs-lradc-channel1",
-	"mxs-lradc-channel2",
-	"mxs-lradc-channel3",
-	"mxs-lradc-channel4",
-	"mxs-lradc-channel5",
-	"mxs-lradc-button0",
-	"mxs-lradc-button1",
-};
-
 static const u32 mxs_lradc_adc_vref_mv[][LRADC_MAX_TOTAL_CHANS] = {
 	[IMX23_LRADC] = {
 		VREF_MV_BASE,		/* CH0 */
@@ -691,9 +668,8 @@ static int mxs_lradc_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	struct mxs_lradc_adc *adc;
 	struct iio_dev *iio;
 	struct resource *iores;
-	int ret, irq, virq, i, s, n;
+	int ret, i, s;
 	u64 scale_uv;
-	const char **irq_name;
 
 	/* Allocate the IIO device. */
 	iio = devm_iio_device_alloc(dev, sizeof(*adc));
@@ -725,28 +701,19 @@ static int mxs_lradc_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (lradc->soc == IMX23_LRADC) {
 		iio->channels = mx23_lradc_chan_spec;
 		iio->num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(mx23_lradc_chan_spec);
-		irq_name = mx23_lradc_adc_irq_names;
-		n = ARRAY_SIZE(mx23_lradc_adc_irq_names);
 	} else {
 		iio->channels = mx28_lradc_chan_spec;
 		iio->num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(mx28_lradc_chan_spec);
-		irq_name = mx28_lradc_adc_irq_names;
-		n = ARRAY_SIZE(mx28_lradc_adc_irq_names);
 	}
 
 	ret = stmp_reset_block(adc->base);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
-		irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, irq_name[i]);
-		if (irq < 0)
-			return irq;
-
-		virq = irq_of_parse_and_map(dev->parent->of_node, irq);
-
-		ret = devm_request_irq(dev, virq, mxs_lradc_adc_handle_irq,
-				       0, irq_name[i], iio);
+	for (i = 0; i < lradc->num_adc_irqs; i++) {
+		ret = devm_request_irq(dev, lradc->adc_irq[i],
+				       mxs_lradc_adc_handle_irq, 0,
+				       dev_name(dev), iio);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
 	}
diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/mxs-lradc-ts.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/mxs-lradc-ts.c
index 2970d9eb9c2b..998206cab3e7 100644
--- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/mxs-lradc-ts.c
+++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/mxs-lradc-ts.c
@@ -18,15 +18,8 @@
 #include <linux/mfd/core.h>
 #include <linux/mfd/mxs-lradc.h>
 #include <linux/of.h>
-#include <linux/of_irq.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
 
-static const char * const mxs_lradc_ts_irq_names[] = {
-	"mxs-lradc-touchscreen",
-	"mxs-lradc-channel6",
-	"mxs-lradc-channel7",
-};
-
 /*
  * Touchscreen handling
  */
@@ -605,7 +598,7 @@ static int mxs_lradc_ts_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	struct device_node *node = dev->parent->of_node;
 	struct mxs_lradc *lradc = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);
 	struct mxs_lradc_ts *ts;
-	int ret, irq, virq, i;
+	int ret, i;
 	u32 ts_wires = 0, adapt;
 
 	ts = devm_kzalloc_obj(dev, *ts);
@@ -668,19 +661,12 @@ static int mxs_lradc_ts_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		return ret;
 
 	mxs_lradc_ts_hw_init(ts);
+	mxs_lradc_ts_stop(ts);
 
-	for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
-		irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, mxs_lradc_ts_irq_names[i]);
-		if (irq < 0)
-			return irq;
-
-		virq = irq_of_parse_and_map(node, irq);
-
-		mxs_lradc_ts_stop(ts);
-
-		ret = devm_request_irq(dev, virq,
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(lradc->ts_irq); i++) {
+		ret = devm_request_irq(dev, lradc->ts_irq[i],
 				       mxs_lradc_ts_handle_irq,
-				       0, mxs_lradc_ts_irq_names[i], ts);
+				       0, dev_name(dev), ts);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
 	}
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/mxs-lradc.c b/drivers/mfd/mxs-lradc.c
index 30a66e268169..5af21abc67f5 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/mxs-lradc.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/mxs-lradc.c
@@ -18,12 +18,9 @@
 #include <linux/of.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
 #include <linux/property.h>
+#include <linux/sizes.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 
-#define ADC_CELL		0
-#define TSC_CELL		1
-#define RES_MEM			0
-
 enum mx23_lradc_irqs {
 	MX23_LRADC_TS_IRQ = 0,
 	MX23_LRADC_CH0_IRQ,
@@ -52,84 +49,111 @@ enum mx28_lradc_irqs {
 	MX28_LRADC_BUTTON1_IRQ,
 };
 
-static struct resource mx23_adc_resources[] = {
-	DEFINE_RES_MEM(0x0, 0x0),
-	DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(MX23_LRADC_CH0_IRQ, "mxs-lradc-channel0"),
-	DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(MX23_LRADC_CH1_IRQ, "mxs-lradc-channel1"),
-	DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(MX23_LRADC_CH2_IRQ, "mxs-lradc-channel2"),
-	DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(MX23_LRADC_CH3_IRQ, "mxs-lradc-channel3"),
-	DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(MX23_LRADC_CH4_IRQ, "mxs-lradc-channel4"),
-	DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(MX23_LRADC_CH5_IRQ, "mxs-lradc-channel5"),
+struct mxs_lradc_soc_data {
+	enum mxs_lradc_id soc;
+	unsigned int num_adc_irqs;
+	u8 adc_irq[MXS_LRADC_MAX_ADC_IRQS];
+	u8 ts_irq[MXS_LRADC_NUM_TS_IRQS];
 };
 
-static struct resource mx23_touchscreen_resources[] = {
-	DEFINE_RES_MEM(0x0, 0x0),
-	DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(MX23_LRADC_TS_IRQ, "mxs-lradc-touchscreen"),
-	DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(MX23_LRADC_CH6_IRQ, "mxs-lradc-channel6"),
-	DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(MX23_LRADC_CH7_IRQ, "mxs-lradc-channel7"),
+static const struct mxs_lradc_soc_data mx23_lradc_data = {
+	.soc = IMX23_LRADC,
+	.num_adc_irqs = 6,
+	.adc_irq = {
+		MX23_LRADC_CH0_IRQ,
+		MX23_LRADC_CH1_IRQ,
+		MX23_LRADC_CH2_IRQ,
+		MX23_LRADC_CH3_IRQ,
+		MX23_LRADC_CH4_IRQ,
+		MX23_LRADC_CH5_IRQ,
+	},
+	.ts_irq = {
+		MX23_LRADC_TS_IRQ,
+		MX23_LRADC_CH6_IRQ,
+		MX23_LRADC_CH7_IRQ,
+	},
 };
 
-static struct resource mx28_adc_resources[] = {
-	DEFINE_RES_MEM(0x0, 0x0),
-	DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(MX28_LRADC_TRESH0_IRQ, "mxs-lradc-thresh0"),
-	DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(MX28_LRADC_TRESH1_IRQ, "mxs-lradc-thresh1"),
-	DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(MX28_LRADC_CH0_IRQ, "mxs-lradc-channel0"),
-	DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(MX28_LRADC_CH1_IRQ, "mxs-lradc-channel1"),
-	DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(MX28_LRADC_CH2_IRQ, "mxs-lradc-channel2"),
-	DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(MX28_LRADC_CH3_IRQ, "mxs-lradc-channel3"),
-	DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(MX28_LRADC_CH4_IRQ, "mxs-lradc-channel4"),
-	DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(MX28_LRADC_CH5_IRQ, "mxs-lradc-channel5"),
-	DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(MX28_LRADC_BUTTON0_IRQ, "mxs-lradc-button0"),
-	DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(MX28_LRADC_BUTTON1_IRQ, "mxs-lradc-button1"),
+static const struct mxs_lradc_soc_data mx28_lradc_data = {
+	.soc = IMX28_LRADC,
+	.num_adc_irqs = 10,
+	.adc_irq = {
+		MX28_LRADC_TRESH0_IRQ,
+		MX28_LRADC_TRESH1_IRQ,
+		MX28_LRADC_CH0_IRQ,
+		MX28_LRADC_CH1_IRQ,
+		MX28_LRADC_CH2_IRQ,
+		MX28_LRADC_CH3_IRQ,
+		MX28_LRADC_CH4_IRQ,
+		MX28_LRADC_CH5_IRQ,
+		MX28_LRADC_BUTTON0_IRQ,
+		MX28_LRADC_BUTTON1_IRQ,
+	},
+	.ts_irq = {
+		MX28_LRADC_TS_IRQ,
+		MX28_LRADC_CH6_IRQ,
+		MX28_LRADC_CH7_IRQ,
+	},
 };
 
-static struct resource mx28_touchscreen_resources[] = {
-	DEFINE_RES_MEM(0x0, 0x0),
-	DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(MX28_LRADC_TS_IRQ, "mxs-lradc-touchscreen"),
-	DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(MX28_LRADC_CH6_IRQ, "mxs-lradc-channel6"),
-	DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(MX28_LRADC_CH7_IRQ, "mxs-lradc-channel7"),
+static const struct resource mxs_lradc_resources[] = {
+	DEFINE_RES_MEM(0, SZ_8K),
 };
 
-static struct mfd_cell mx23_cells[] = {
+static const struct mfd_cell mxs_lradc_cells[] = {
 	{
 		.name = "mxs-lradc-adc",
-		.resources = mx23_adc_resources,
-		.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(mx23_adc_resources),
+		.resources = mxs_lradc_resources,
+		.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(mxs_lradc_resources),
 	},
 	{
 		.name = "mxs-lradc-ts",
-		.resources = mx23_touchscreen_resources,
-		.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(mx23_touchscreen_resources),
+		.resources = mxs_lradc_resources,
+		.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(mxs_lradc_resources),
 	},
 };
 
-static struct mfd_cell mx28_cells[] = {
-	{
-		.name = "mxs-lradc-adc",
-		.resources = mx28_adc_resources,
-		.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(mx28_adc_resources),
-	},
-	{
-		.name = "mxs-lradc-ts",
-		.resources = mx28_touchscreen_resources,
-		.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(mx28_touchscreen_resources),
-	}
-};
-
 static const struct of_device_id mxs_lradc_dt_ids[] = {
-	{ .compatible = "fsl,imx23-lradc", .data = (void *)IMX23_LRADC, },
-	{ .compatible = "fsl,imx28-lradc", .data = (void *)IMX28_LRADC, },
+	{ .compatible = "fsl,imx23-lradc", .data = &mx23_lradc_data, },
+	{ .compatible = "fsl,imx28-lradc", .data = &mx28_lradc_data, },
 	{ /* sentinel */ }
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mxs_lradc_dt_ids);
 
+static int mxs_lradc_get_irqs(struct platform_device *pdev,
+			      struct mxs_lradc *lradc,
+			      const struct mxs_lradc_soc_data *data)
+{
+	int i, irq;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < data->num_adc_irqs; i++) {
+		irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, data->adc_irq[i]);
+		if (irq < 0)
+			return irq;
+
+		lradc->adc_irq[i] = irq;
+	}
+	lradc->num_adc_irqs = data->num_adc_irqs;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(data->ts_irq); i++) {
+		irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, data->ts_irq[i]);
+		if (irq < 0)
+			return irq;
+
+		lradc->ts_irq[i] = irq;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int mxs_lradc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
 	struct device_node *node = dev->of_node;
+	const struct mxs_lradc_soc_data *data;
 	struct mxs_lradc *lradc;
-	struct mfd_cell *cells = NULL;
 	struct resource *res;
+	unsigned int num_cells;
 	int ret = 0;
 	u32 ts_wires = 0;
 
@@ -137,7 +161,8 @@ static int mxs_lradc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (!lradc)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	lradc->soc = (kernel_ulong_t)device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
+	data = device_get_match_data(dev);
+	lradc->soc = data->soc;
 
 	lradc->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
 	if (IS_ERR(lradc->clk)) {
@@ -187,38 +212,15 @@ static int mxs_lradc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		goto err_clk;
 	}
 
-	switch (lradc->soc) {
-	case IMX23_LRADC:
-		mx23_adc_resources[RES_MEM] = *res;
-		mx23_touchscreen_resources[RES_MEM] = *res;
-		cells = mx23_cells;
-		break;
-	case IMX28_LRADC:
-		mx28_adc_resources[RES_MEM] = *res;
-		mx28_touchscreen_resources[RES_MEM] = *res;
-		cells = mx28_cells;
-		break;
-	default:
-		dev_err(dev, "Unsupported SoC\n");
-		ret = -ENODEV;
+	ret = mxs_lradc_get_irqs(pdev, lradc, data);
+	if (ret)
 		goto err_clk;
-	}
-
-	ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(&pdev->dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE,
-				   &cells[ADC_CELL], 1, NULL, 0, NULL);
-	if (ret) {
-		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to add the ADC subdevice\n");
-		goto err_clk;
-	}
-
-	if (!lradc->touchscreen_wire)
-		return 0;
 
-	ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(&pdev->dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE,
-				   &cells[TSC_CELL], 1, NULL, 0, NULL);
+	num_cells = lradc->touchscreen_wire ? ARRAY_SIZE(mxs_lradc_cells) : 1;
+	ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE,
+				   mxs_lradc_cells, num_cells, res, 0, NULL);
 	if (ret) {
-		dev_err(&pdev->dev,
-			"Failed to add the touchscreen subdevice\n");
+		dev_err(dev, "Failed to add subdevices\n");
 		goto err_clk;
 	}
 
diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/mxs-lradc.h b/include/linux/mfd/mxs-lradc.h
index ada3d81ee277..d36951f03da2 100644
--- a/include/linux/mfd/mxs-lradc.h
+++ b/include/linux/mfd/mxs-lradc.h
@@ -19,6 +19,9 @@
 #define LRADC_MAX_MAPPED_CHANS	8
 #define LRADC_MAX_TOTAL_CHANS	16
 
+#define MXS_LRADC_MAX_ADC_IRQS	10
+#define MXS_LRADC_NUM_TS_IRQS	3
+
 #define LRADC_DELAY_TIMER_HZ	2000
 
 #define LRADC_CTRL0				0x00
@@ -153,6 +156,9 @@ enum mxs_lradc_ts_wires {
  * @buffer_vchans: channels that can be used during buffered capture
  * @touchscreen_wire: touchscreen type (4-wire or 5-wire)
  * @use_touchbutton: button state (on or off)
+ * @num_adc_irqs: number of ADC interrupts
+ * @adc_irq: ADC interrupts
+ * @ts_irq: touchscreen interrupts
  */
 struct mxs_lradc {
 	enum mxs_lradc_id	soc;
@@ -161,6 +167,10 @@ struct mxs_lradc {
 
 	enum mxs_lradc_ts_wires	touchscreen_wire;
 	bool			use_touchbutton;
+
+	unsigned int		num_adc_irqs;
+	int			adc_irq[MXS_LRADC_MAX_ADC_IRQS];
+	int			ts_irq[MXS_LRADC_NUM_TS_IRQS];
 };
 
 static inline u32 mxs_lradc_irq_mask(struct mxs_lradc *lradc)
-- 
2.43.0

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mfd: mxs-lradc: Pass parent IRQs to child drivers

[sashiko-bot]

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue to consider:
- [Low] mfd: mxs-lradc: Fixes trailer cites driver-core warning commit
--

commit fbb3c430756f909de04d8f2ea7a88e5473612cd3
Author: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>

> mfd: mxs-lradc: Pass parent IRQs to child drivers
> 
> The MFD driver stores raw DT interrupt indices in IRQ resources but
> registers its child devices without an IRQ domain or IRQ base. The child
> drivers consequently receive the indices as if they were mapped Linux
> IRQ numbers. IRQ index 0 triggers the platform_get_irq_byname() warning:
> 
>   0 is an invalid IRQ number
> 
> The children then try to recover the indices from their resources and
> map them against the parent OF node. Besides duplicating IRQ names in
> the parent and children, this relies on invalid platform IRQ resources
> and fails when IRQ 0 is rejected.
> 
> Resolve the interrupts with platform_get_irq() in the MFD parent and
> store the mapped IRQs in the shared LRADC data. Drop the child IRQ
> resources and duplicated name arrays, and have both child drivers
> request the mapped IRQs directly. Use the MFD memory base support to
> translate a single relative memory resource shared by both cells.
> 
> Tested on an i.MX28 EVK. The mxs-lradc-ts driver probes successfully,
> touch events are reported, and the touch-detect and LRADC channel 7
> interrupt counters increase as expected.
> 
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Suggested-by: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-input/CAOMZO5CgTzo6GuXptD4mFTN=UsJJqpkixDW1Q64gqZGrij8+uQ@mail.gmail.com/
> Fixes: a85a6c86c25b ("driver core: platform: Clarify that IRQ 0 is invalid")
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>

[Severity: Low]
Commit a85a6c86c25b ("driver core: platform: Clarify that IRQ 0 is
invalid") only added a warning in the platform driver core when an
IORESOURCE_IRQ resource has start == 0.  The unmapped DT interrupt indices
in the MFD cell resources and the irq_of_parse_and_map() workaround in the
child drivers were introduced when the driver was split in ead25133e935
("mfd: mxs-lradc: Add support for mxs-lradc"), 6dd112b9f85e ("iio: adc:
mxs-lradc: Add support for ADC driver"), and d81ca730e3e4 ("input:
touchscreen: mxs-lradc: Add support for touchscreen").

Should the Fixes: tag reference those commits instead?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261110141934.42490-1-festevam@gmail.com?part=2

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mfd: mxs-lradc: Pass parent IRQs to child drivers

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Tue, Nov 10, 2026 at 11:19:34AM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> The MFD driver stores raw DT interrupt indices in IRQ resources but
> registers its child devices without an IRQ domain or IRQ base. The child
> drivers consequently receive the indices as if they were mapped Linux
> IRQ numbers. IRQ index 0 triggers the platform_get_irq_byname() warning:
> 
>   0 is an invalid IRQ number
> 
> The children then try to recover the indices from their resources and
> map them against the parent OF node. Besides duplicating IRQ names in
> the parent and children, this relies on invalid platform IRQ resources
> and fails when IRQ 0 is rejected.
> 
> Resolve the interrupts with platform_get_irq() in the MFD parent and
> store the mapped IRQs in the shared LRADC data. Drop the child IRQ
> resources and duplicated name arrays, and have both child drivers
> request the mapped IRQs directly. Use the MFD memory base support to
> translate a single relative memory resource shared by both cells.
> 
> Tested on an i.MX28 EVK. The mxs-lradc-ts driver probes successfully,
> touch events are reported, and the touch-detect and LRADC channel 7
> interrupt counters increase as expected.
> 
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Suggested-by: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-input/CAOMZO5CgTzo6GuXptD4mFTN=UsJJqpkixDW1Q64gqZGrij8+uQ@mail.gmail.com/

He-he, this rings a bell! I have still a copy of the mbox of this thread
locally to maybe (likely never) look into that. So, I am so glad to see this
being eventually addressed!

> Fixes: a85a6c86c25b ("driver core: platform: Clarify that IRQ 0 is invalid")
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>

...

>  	struct device_node *node = dev->parent->of_node;
>  	struct mxs_lradc *lradc = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);
>  	struct mxs_lradc_ts *ts;
> -	int ret, irq, virq, i;
> +	int ret, i;
>  	u32 ts_wires = 0, adapt;

Can we, while at it, kinda follow the reversed xmas tree order here?

...

> -	lradc->soc = (kernel_ulong_t)device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> +	data = device_get_match_data(dev);

Is this driver affected by driver_override case? If so, this has to be checked
against NULL and return -ENODATA.

> +	lradc->soc = data->soc;

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: mfd: mxs-lradc: Fix interrupt order

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On Tue, Nov 10, 2026 at 11:19:33AM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> The interrupt descriptions added during the conversion to YAML do not
> match the ICOLL source numbers used by the existing DTS files.
> 
> For i.MX23, Table 5-1 of the reference manual maps source 36 to touch
> detection and sources 37 through 44 to channels 0 through 7. imx23.dtsi
> lists these sources in that order.
> 
> For i.MX28, Table 5-1 maps source 10 to touch detection, sources 14 and
> 15 to the threshold interrupts, sources 16 through 23 to channels 0
> through 7, and sources 24 and 25 to buttons 0 and 1. imx28.dtsi also
> lists these sources in that order.
> 
> Reorder the schema descriptions to match the hardware documentation and
> the existing DT ABI.
> 
> Fixes: 009528b5aa13 ("dt-bindings: mfd: convert mxs-lradc bindings to json-schema")
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>

Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com>

Best regards,
Krzysztof