From: Romain Gantois <romain.gantois@bootlin.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Cc: "Puranjay Mohan" <puranjay@kernel.org>,
"David Lechner" <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Petazzoni" <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
"Wil Stark" <wil_stark@keysight.com>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: ti,tmp117: add binding for the TMP119
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2026 14:24:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ft-705oeTSiaftSGNjv94A@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260605125332.151b92f8@jic23-huawei>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1184 bytes --]
Hi Jonathan,
On Friday, 5 June 2026 13:53:32 CEST Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Jun 2026 11:01:35 +0200
>
> Romain Gantois <romain.gantois@bootlin.com> wrote:
> > The TMP119 has the same register layout as the TMP117, and a better local
> > sensor accuracy.
>
> Sounds like (and the driver changes pretty much confirm) that this could
> use a fallback compatible to the tmp117.
>
What do you mean by "fallback compatible" in this case? Do you mean we should
do something like this in the bindings:
```
enum:
- ti,tmp116
- ti,tmp119
const:
- ti,tmp117
```
But wouldn't this invalidate existing device trees which only have:
`compatible = "ti,tmp116";`
> The second patch then just resolves the print that would happen on older
> kernels using that fallback due to ID mismatch. That's fine but nice
> if older kernels can work with this part.
Sorry I don't quite understand: since this is a feature patch, I don't expect
it would get backported onto older kernels. Therefore why would the second
patch resolve the print happening on older kernels?
Thanks,
--
Romain Gantois, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-05 12:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-05 9:01 [PATCH 0/2] iio: temperature: tmp117: Support the TMP119 sensor Romain Gantois
2026-06-05 9:01 ` [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: ti,tmp117: add binding for the TMP119 Romain Gantois
2026-06-05 11:53 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-06-05 12:24 ` Romain Gantois [this message]
2026-06-05 14:20 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-06-05 16:08 ` Conor Dooley
2026-06-05 9:01 ` [PATCH 2/2] iio: temperature: tmp117: add TI TMP119 support Romain Gantois
2026-06-05 11:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-05 11:38 ` Romain Gantois
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ft-705oeTSiaftSGNjv94A@bootlin.com \
--to=romain.gantois@bootlin.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=wil_stark@keysight.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox