Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v11 0/6] spmi: apple: Additional commands and interrupt support.
@ 2026-11-07 20:36 Sasha Finkelstein
  2026-11-07 20:36 ` [PATCH v11 1/6] dt-bindings: spmi: apple,spmi: Add t603x and t8122 Sasha Finkelstein
                   ` (5 more replies)
  0 siblings, 6 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Finkelstein @ 2026-11-07 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sven Peter, Janne Grunau, Neal Gompa, Stephen Boyd, Rob Herring,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley
  Cc: asahi, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, devicetree,
	Sasha Finkelstein, Conor Dooley, Alba Mendez

The SPMI bus has grown additional responsibilities in the M3
generation, making the current driver insufficient. Add M3 comatibles,
support for slave-sent interrupts, FIFO interrupts, power management
commands, parity validation, and fix locking.

To simplify the merge strategy, the device tree entries will be sent
in a future patch series.

Signed-off-by: Sasha Finkelstein <k@chaosmail.tech>
---
Changes in v11:
- Rebase on 6.4
- Link to v10: https://patch.msgid.link/20261001-t603x-spmi-v10-0-ff815c66c73f@chaosmail.tech

Changes in v10:
- Just collecting tags, effectively a resend
- Link to v9: https://patch.msgid.link/20260901-t603x-spmi-v9-0-09e702e3b153@chaosmail.tech

Changes in v9:
- more dt-binding fixes
- Link to v8: https://patch.msgid.link/20260828-t603x-spmi-v8-0-708d4d12e0fd@chaosmail.tech

Changes in v8:
- dt-binding style fixes per review
- Link to v7: https://patch.msgid.link/20260818-t603x-spmi-v7-0-dafebe6e7739@chaosmail.tech

Changes in v7:
- Require interrupt support on M3+
- Link to v6: https://patch.msgid.link/20260816-t603x-spmi-v6-0-c5ab87aa447b@chaosmail.tech

Changes in v6:
- Fix interrupt controller teardown
- Link to v5: https://patch.msgid.link/20260808-t603x-spmi-v5-0-553c5ac2f137@chaosmail.tech

Changes in v5:
- Style fixes per review
- Fix fifo flush
- Link to v4: https://patch.msgid.link/20260805-t603x-spmi-v4-0-c15a12d9a7d1@chaosmail.tech

Changes in v4:
- Re-do error recovery.
- Fix an address calculation mistake
- Link to v3: https://patch.msgid.link/20260803-t603x-spmi-v3-0-c17b506d91a1@chaosmail.tech

Changes in v3:
- Rework interrupt support
- Address review comments
- Link to v2: https://patch.msgid.link/20260728-t603x-spmi-v2-0-f43e5f10e583@chaosmail.tech

Changes in v2:
- Change locking to non-interruptible
- Reorder irq ack
- Clarify dt binding
- Some data type cleanups
- Link to v1: https://patch.msgid.link/20260725-t603x-spmi-v1-0-e1a29fcd2d38@chaosmail.tech

---
Alba Mendez (5):
      spmi: apple: Validate FIFO state
      spmi: apple: check transaction status
      spmi: apple: Implement remaining commands
      spmi: apple: lock around FIFOs
      spmi: apple: Add interrupt functionality

Sasha Finkelstein (1):
      dt-bindings: spmi: apple,spmi: Add t603x and t8122

 .../devicetree/bindings/spmi/apple,spmi.yaml       |  29 ++
 drivers/spmi/Kconfig                               |   3 +-
 drivers/spmi/spmi-apple-controller.c               | 389 +++++++++++++++++++--
 3 files changed, 389 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: 6628e7d4c6b25c8d18f1345e3a20d21829aae7e4
change-id: 20260725-t603x-spmi-74630bf1b0a0

Best regards,
--  
Sasha Finkelstein <k@chaosmail.tech>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v11 1/6] dt-bindings: spmi: apple,spmi: Add t603x and t8122
  2026-11-07 20:36 [PATCH v11 0/6] spmi: apple: Additional commands and interrupt support Sasha Finkelstein
@ 2026-11-07 20:36 ` Sasha Finkelstein
  2026-11-07 20:36 ` [PATCH v11 2/6] spmi: apple: Validate FIFO state Sasha Finkelstein
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Finkelstein @ 2026-11-07 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sven Peter, Janne Grunau, Neal Gompa, Stephen Boyd, Rob Herring,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley
  Cc: asahi, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, devicetree,
	Sasha Finkelstein, Conor Dooley

Add t603x and t8122 compatibles, interrupt support, and support for
SPMI controllers that are not always-on.

Reviewed-by: Janne Grunau <j@jannau.net>
Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Finkelstein <k@chaosmail.tech>
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/spmi/apple,spmi.yaml       | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/apple,spmi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/apple,spmi.yaml
index 3e5b14bc8c31..4e73083ecec3 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/apple,spmi.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/apple,spmi.yaml
@@ -20,8 +20,11 @@ properties:
       - items:
           - enum:
               - apple,t6020-spmi
+              - apple,t6030-spmi
+              - apple,t6031-spmi
               - apple,t8012-spmi
               - apple,t8015-spmi
+              - apple,t8122-spmi
           - const: apple,t8103-spmi
       - items:
           - enum:
@@ -34,10 +37,36 @@ properties:
   reg:
     maxItems: 1
 
+  interrupts:
+    maxItems: 1
+    description: Optional, operates in polled mode if not present
+
+  interrupt-controller: true
+
+  "#interrupt-cells":
+    const: 2
+
+  power-domains:
+    maxItems: 1
+
 required:
   - compatible
   - reg
 
+if:
+  properties:
+    compatible:
+      contains:
+        enum:
+          - apple,t8122-spmi
+          - apple,t6030-spmi
+          - apple,t6031-spmi
+then:
+  required:
+    - interrupt-controller
+    - "#interrupt-cells"
+    - interrupts
+
 unevaluatedProperties: false
 
 examples:

-- 
2.56.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v11 2/6] spmi: apple: Validate FIFO state
  2026-11-07 20:36 [PATCH v11 0/6] spmi: apple: Additional commands and interrupt support Sasha Finkelstein
  2026-11-07 20:36 ` [PATCH v11 1/6] dt-bindings: spmi: apple,spmi: Add t603x and t8122 Sasha Finkelstein
@ 2026-11-07 20:36 ` Sasha Finkelstein
  2026-11-07 20:36 ` [PATCH v11 3/6] spmi: apple: check transaction status Sasha Finkelstein
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Finkelstein @ 2026-11-07 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sven Peter, Janne Grunau, Neal Gompa, Stephen Boyd, Rob Herring,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley
  Cc: asahi, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, devicetree,
	Sasha Finkelstein, Alba Mendez

From: Alba Mendez <me@alba.sh>

Check for data before reading the body of a reply, and check for
end of data afterwards.

Signed-off-by: Alba Mendez <me@alba.sh>
Reviewed-by: Janne Grunau <j@jannau.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Finkelstein <k@chaosmail.tech>
---
 drivers/spmi/spmi-apple-controller.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/spmi/spmi-apple-controller.c b/drivers/spmi/spmi-apple-controller.c
index 376cf682c43e..15721cb41d5c 100644
--- a/drivers/spmi/spmi-apple-controller.c
+++ b/drivers/spmi/spmi-apple-controller.c
@@ -21,7 +21,9 @@
 #define SPMI_STATUS_REG 0
 #define SPMI_CMD_REG 0x4
 #define SPMI_RSP_REG 0x8
+#define SPMI_ACT_REG 0xa4
 
+#define SPMI_ACT_FIFO_FLUSH BIT(0)
 #define SPMI_RX_FIFO_EMPTY BIT(24)
 
 #define REG_POLL_INTERVAL_US 10000
@@ -29,6 +31,7 @@
 
 struct apple_spmi {
 	void __iomem *regs;
+	bool prev_fail;
 };
 
 #define poll_reg(spmi, reg, val, cond) \
@@ -49,6 +52,7 @@ static int apple_spmi_wait_rx_not_empty(struct spmi_controller *ctrl)
 
 	ret = poll_reg(spmi, SPMI_STATUS_REG, status, !(status & SPMI_RX_FIFO_EMPTY));
 	if (ret) {
+		spmi->prev_fail = true;
 		dev_err(&ctrl->dev,
 			"failed to wait for RX FIFO not empty\n");
 		return ret;
@@ -67,6 +71,11 @@ static int spmi_read_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid,
 	u8 i;
 	int ret;
 
+	if (spmi->prev_fail) {
+		writel(SPMI_ACT_FIFO_FLUSH, spmi->regs + SPMI_ACT_REG);
+		spmi->prev_fail = false;
+	}
+
 	writel(spmi_cmd, spmi->regs + SPMI_CMD_REG);
 
 	ret = apple_spmi_wait_rx_not_empty(ctrl);
@@ -78,6 +87,12 @@ static int spmi_read_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid,
 
 	/* Read SPMI data reply */
 	while (len_read < len) {
+		if (readl(spmi->regs + SPMI_STATUS_REG) & SPMI_RX_FIFO_EMPTY) {
+			spmi->prev_fail = true;
+			dev_err_ratelimited(&ctrl->dev,
+					    "FIFO lacks reply data, controller stuck?\n");
+			return -EIO;
+		}
 		rsp = readl(spmi->regs + SPMI_RSP_REG);
 		i = 0;
 		while ((len_read < len) && (i < 4)) {
@@ -86,6 +101,11 @@ static int spmi_read_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid,
 		}
 	}
 
+	if (!(readl(spmi->regs + SPMI_STATUS_REG) & SPMI_RX_FIFO_EMPTY)) {
+		dev_warn(&ctrl->dev, "FIFO has extra data\n");
+		spmi->prev_fail = true;
+	}
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -97,6 +117,11 @@ static int spmi_write_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid,
 	size_t i = 0, j;
 	int ret;
 
+	if (spmi->prev_fail) {
+		writel(SPMI_ACT_FIFO_FLUSH, spmi->regs + SPMI_ACT_REG);
+		spmi->prev_fail = false;
+	}
+
 	writel(spmi_cmd, spmi->regs + SPMI_CMD_REG);
 
 	while (i < len) {
@@ -115,6 +140,11 @@ static int spmi_write_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid,
 	/* Discard */
 	readl(spmi->regs + SPMI_RSP_REG);
 
+	if (!(readl(spmi->regs + SPMI_STATUS_REG) & SPMI_RX_FIFO_EMPTY)) {
+		dev_warn(&ctrl->dev, "FIFO has extra data\n");
+		spmi->prev_fail = true;
+	}
+
 	return 0;
 }
 

-- 
2.56.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v11 3/6] spmi: apple: check transaction status
  2026-11-07 20:36 [PATCH v11 0/6] spmi: apple: Additional commands and interrupt support Sasha Finkelstein
  2026-11-07 20:36 ` [PATCH v11 1/6] dt-bindings: spmi: apple,spmi: Add t603x and t8122 Sasha Finkelstein
  2026-11-07 20:36 ` [PATCH v11 2/6] spmi: apple: Validate FIFO state Sasha Finkelstein
@ 2026-11-07 20:36 ` Sasha Finkelstein
  2026-11-07 20:36 ` [PATCH v11 4/6] spmi: apple: Implement remaining commands Sasha Finkelstein
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Finkelstein @ 2026-11-07 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sven Peter, Janne Grunau, Neal Gompa, Stephen Boyd, Rob Herring,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley
  Cc: asahi, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, devicetree,
	Sasha Finkelstein, Alba Mendez

From: Alba Mendez <me@alba.sh>

Check for parity errors and missing command ACKs.

Signed-off-by: Alba Mendez <me@alba.sh>
Reviewed-by: Janne Grunau <j@jannau.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Finkelstein <k@chaosmail.tech>
---
 drivers/spmi/spmi-apple-controller.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spmi/spmi-apple-controller.c b/drivers/spmi/spmi-apple-controller.c
index 15721cb41d5c..b1c127cf5f44 100644
--- a/drivers/spmi/spmi-apple-controller.c
+++ b/drivers/spmi/spmi-apple-controller.c
@@ -11,6 +11,8 @@
  *		spmi-pmic-arb.c Copyright (c) 2021, The Linux Foundation.
  */
 
+#include <linux/bitfield.h>
+#include <linux/bits.h>
 #include <linux/io.h>
 #include <linux/iopoll.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
@@ -23,6 +25,12 @@
 #define SPMI_RSP_REG 0x8
 #define SPMI_ACT_REG 0xa4
 
+/* SPMI_RSP_REG reply word */
+#define SPMI_REPLY_FRAME_PARITY_STATUS GENMASK(31, 16)
+#define SPMI_REPLY_ACK BIT(15)
+#define SPMI_REPLY_SLAVE_ID GENMASK(14, 8)
+#define SPMI_REPLY_CMD GENMASK(7, 0)
+
 #define SPMI_ACT_FIFO_FLUSH BIT(0)
 #define SPMI_RX_FIFO_EMPTY BIT(24)
 
@@ -66,7 +74,7 @@ static int spmi_read_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid,
 {
 	struct apple_spmi *spmi = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
 	u32 spmi_cmd = apple_spmi_pack_cmd(opc, sid, saddr, len);
-	u32 rsp;
+	u32 reply, rsp;
 	size_t len_read = 0;
 	u8 i;
 	int ret;
@@ -82,8 +90,7 @@ static int spmi_read_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid,
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	/* Discard SPMI reply status */
-	readl(spmi->regs + SPMI_RSP_REG);
+	reply = readl(spmi->regs + SPMI_RSP_REG);
 
 	/* Read SPMI data reply */
 	while (len_read < len) {
@@ -106,6 +113,10 @@ static int spmi_read_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid,
 		spmi->prev_fail = true;
 	}
 
+	if (~FIELD_GET(SPMI_REPLY_FRAME_PARITY_STATUS, reply) & ((1 << len) - 1)) {
+		dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "some frames failed parity check\n");
+		return -EIO;
+	}
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -114,6 +125,7 @@ static int spmi_write_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid,
 {
 	struct apple_spmi *spmi = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
 	u32 spmi_cmd = apple_spmi_pack_cmd(opc, sid, saddr, len);
+	u32 reply;
 	size_t i = 0, j;
 	int ret;
 
@@ -137,14 +149,17 @@ static int spmi_write_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid,
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	/* Discard */
-	readl(spmi->regs + SPMI_RSP_REG);
+	reply = readl(spmi->regs + SPMI_RSP_REG);
 
 	if (!(readl(spmi->regs + SPMI_STATUS_REG) & SPMI_RX_FIFO_EMPTY)) {
 		dev_warn(&ctrl->dev, "FIFO has extra data\n");
 		spmi->prev_fail = true;
 	}
 
+	if (!FIELD_GET(SPMI_REPLY_ACK, reply)) {
+		dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "command not acknowledged\n");
+		return -EIO;
+	}
 	return 0;
 }
 

-- 
2.56.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v11 4/6] spmi: apple: Implement remaining commands
  2026-11-07 20:36 [PATCH v11 0/6] spmi: apple: Additional commands and interrupt support Sasha Finkelstein
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2026-11-07 20:36 ` [PATCH v11 3/6] spmi: apple: check transaction status Sasha Finkelstein
@ 2026-11-07 20:36 ` Sasha Finkelstein
  2026-11-07 20:36 ` [PATCH v11 5/6] spmi: apple: lock around FIFOs Sasha Finkelstein
  2026-11-07 20:36 ` [PATCH v11 6/6] spmi: apple: Add interrupt functionality Sasha Finkelstein
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Finkelstein @ 2026-11-07 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sven Peter, Janne Grunau, Neal Gompa, Stephen Boyd, Rob Herring,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley
  Cc: asahi, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, devicetree,
	Sasha Finkelstein, Alba Mendez

From: Alba Mendez <me@alba.sh>

Add support for zero write and power management commands.

Signed-off-by: Alba Mendez <me@alba.sh>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Finkelstein <k@chaosmail.tech>
---
 drivers/spmi/spmi-apple-controller.c | 116 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 69 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spmi/spmi-apple-controller.c b/drivers/spmi/spmi-apple-controller.c
index b1c127cf5f44..9843dc871d6c 100644
--- a/drivers/spmi/spmi-apple-controller.c
+++ b/drivers/spmi/spmi-apple-controller.c
@@ -46,9 +46,9 @@ struct apple_spmi {
 	readl_poll_timeout((spmi)->regs + (reg), (val), (cond), \
 			   REG_POLL_INTERVAL_US, REG_POLL_TIMEOUT_US)
 
-static inline u32 apple_spmi_pack_cmd(u8 opc, u8 sid, u16 saddr, size_t len)
+static inline u32 apple_spmi_pack_cmd(u8 opc, u8 sid, u16 param)
 {
-	return opc | sid << 8 | saddr << 16 | (len - 1) | (1 << 15);
+	return opc | sid << 8 | (u32)param << 16 | (1 << 15);
 }
 
 /* Wait for Rx FIFO to have something */
@@ -69,14 +69,13 @@ static int apple_spmi_wait_rx_not_empty(struct spmi_controller *ctrl)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int spmi_read_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid,
-			 u16 saddr, u8 *buf, size_t len)
+static int spmi_raw_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid, u16 param,
+			const u8 *buf_wr, size_t len_wr, u8 *buf_rd, size_t len_rd)
 {
 	struct apple_spmi *spmi = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
-	u32 spmi_cmd = apple_spmi_pack_cmd(opc, sid, saddr, len);
+	u32 spmi_cmd = apple_spmi_pack_cmd(opc, sid, param);
 	u32 reply, rsp;
-	size_t len_read = 0;
-	u8 i;
+	size_t i = 0, j;
 	int ret;
 
 	if (spmi->prev_fail) {
@@ -86,6 +85,14 @@ static int spmi_read_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid,
 
 	writel(spmi_cmd, spmi->regs + SPMI_CMD_REG);
 
+	while (i < len_wr) {
+		j = min_t(size_t, sizeof(spmi_cmd), len_wr - i);
+		spmi_cmd = 0;
+		memcpy(&spmi_cmd, buf_wr + i, j);
+		writel(spmi_cmd, spmi->regs + SPMI_CMD_REG);
+		i += j;
+	}
+
 	ret = apple_spmi_wait_rx_not_empty(ctrl);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
@@ -93,7 +100,8 @@ static int spmi_read_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid,
 	reply = readl(spmi->regs + SPMI_RSP_REG);
 
 	/* Read SPMI data reply */
-	while (len_read < len) {
+	i = 0;
+	while (i < len_rd) {
 		if (readl(spmi->regs + SPMI_STATUS_REG) & SPMI_RX_FIFO_EMPTY) {
 			spmi->prev_fail = true;
 			dev_err_ratelimited(&ctrl->dev,
@@ -101,11 +109,9 @@ static int spmi_read_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid,
 			return -EIO;
 		}
 		rsp = readl(spmi->regs + SPMI_RSP_REG);
-		i = 0;
-		while ((len_read < len) && (i < 4)) {
-			buf[len_read++] = ((0xff << (8 * i)) & rsp) >> (8 * i);
-			i += 1;
-		}
+		j = min_t(size_t, sizeof(spmi_cmd), len_rd - i);
+		memcpy(buf_rd + i, &rsp, j);
+		i += j;
 	}
 
 	if (!(readl(spmi->regs + SPMI_STATUS_REG) & SPMI_RX_FIFO_EMPTY)) {
@@ -113,54 +119,69 @@ static int spmi_read_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid,
 		spmi->prev_fail = true;
 	}
 
-	if (~FIELD_GET(SPMI_REPLY_FRAME_PARITY_STATUS, reply) & ((1 << len) - 1)) {
+	if (!len_rd && !FIELD_GET(SPMI_REPLY_ACK, reply)) {
+		dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "command not acknowledged\n");
+		return -EIO;
+	}
+	if (~FIELD_GET(SPMI_REPLY_FRAME_PARITY_STATUS, reply) & ((1 << len_rd) - 1)) {
 		dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "some frames failed parity check\n");
 		return -EIO;
 	}
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int spmi_write_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid,
-			  u16 saddr, const u8 *buf, size_t len)
+/* Send a raw command with 1..16 input data frames */
+static int spmi_raw_cmd_input(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid,
+			 u16 param, u8 *buf, size_t len)
 {
-	struct apple_spmi *spmi = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
-	u32 spmi_cmd = apple_spmi_pack_cmd(opc, sid, saddr, len);
-	u32 reply;
-	size_t i = 0, j;
-	int ret;
-
-	if (spmi->prev_fail) {
-		writel(SPMI_ACT_FIFO_FLUSH, spmi->regs + SPMI_ACT_REG);
-		spmi->prev_fail = false;
-	}
-
-	writel(spmi_cmd, spmi->regs + SPMI_CMD_REG);
+	return spmi_raw_cmd(ctrl, opc, sid, param, NULL, 0, buf, len);
+}
 
-	while (i < len) {
-		j = 0;
-		spmi_cmd = 0;
-		while ((j < 4) & (i < len))
-			spmi_cmd |= buf[i++] << (j++ * 8);
+/* Send a raw command with (optional) body and an input ACK */
+static int spmi_raw_cmd_ack(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid,
+			  u16 param, const u8 *buf, size_t len)
+{
+	return spmi_raw_cmd(ctrl, opc, sid, param, buf, len, NULL, 0);
+}
 
-		writel(spmi_cmd, spmi->regs + SPMI_CMD_REG);
+static int spmi_read_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid,
+			 u16 saddr, u8 *buf, size_t len)
+{
+	switch (opc) {
+	case SPMI_CMD_EXT_READ:
+	case SPMI_CMD_EXT_READL:
+		return spmi_raw_cmd_input(ctrl, opc | (len - 1), sid, saddr, buf, len);
+	case SPMI_CMD_READ:
+		return spmi_raw_cmd_input(ctrl, opc | saddr, sid, saddr, buf, len);
 	}
+	return -EINVAL;
+}
 
-	ret = apple_spmi_wait_rx_not_empty(ctrl);
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
-
-	reply = readl(spmi->regs + SPMI_RSP_REG);
-
-	if (!(readl(spmi->regs + SPMI_STATUS_REG) & SPMI_RX_FIFO_EMPTY)) {
-		dev_warn(&ctrl->dev, "FIFO has extra data\n");
-		spmi->prev_fail = true;
+static int spmi_write_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid,
+			  u16 saddr, const u8 *buf, size_t len)
+{
+	switch (opc) {
+	case SPMI_CMD_WRITE:
+		return spmi_raw_cmd_ack(ctrl, opc | saddr, sid, buf[0] << 8 | saddr, NULL, 0);
+	case SPMI_CMD_ZERO_WRITE:
+		return spmi_raw_cmd_ack(ctrl, opc | buf[0], sid, buf[0] << 8 | saddr, NULL, 0);
+	case SPMI_CMD_EXT_WRITE:
+	case SPMI_CMD_EXT_WRITEL:
+		return spmi_raw_cmd_ack(ctrl, opc | (len - 1), sid, saddr, buf, len);
 	}
+	return -EINVAL;
+}
 
-	if (!FIELD_GET(SPMI_REPLY_ACK, reply)) {
-		dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "command not acknowledged\n");
-		return -EIO;
+static int spmi_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid)
+{
+	switch (opc) {
+	case SPMI_CMD_RESET:
+	case SPMI_CMD_SLEEP:
+	case SPMI_CMD_SHUTDOWN:
+	case SPMI_CMD_WAKEUP:
+		return spmi_raw_cmd_ack(ctrl, opc, sid, 0, NULL, 0);
 	}
-	return 0;
+	return -EINVAL;
 }
 
 static int apple_spmi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
@@ -183,6 +204,7 @@ static int apple_spmi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	ctrl->read_cmd = spmi_read_cmd;
 	ctrl->write_cmd = spmi_write_cmd;
+	ctrl->cmd = spmi_cmd;
 
 	ret = devm_spmi_controller_add(&pdev->dev, ctrl);
 	if (ret)

-- 
2.56.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v11 5/6] spmi: apple: lock around FIFOs
  2026-11-07 20:36 [PATCH v11 0/6] spmi: apple: Additional commands and interrupt support Sasha Finkelstein
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2026-11-07 20:36 ` [PATCH v11 4/6] spmi: apple: Implement remaining commands Sasha Finkelstein
@ 2026-11-07 20:36 ` Sasha Finkelstein
  2026-11-08  4:59   ` sashiko-bot
  2026-11-07 20:36 ` [PATCH v11 6/6] spmi: apple: Add interrupt functionality Sasha Finkelstein
  5 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Finkelstein @ 2026-11-07 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sven Peter, Janne Grunau, Neal Gompa, Stephen Boyd, Rob Herring,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley
  Cc: asahi, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, devicetree,
	Sasha Finkelstein, Alba Mendez

From: Alba Mendez <me@alba.sh>

The driver was missing locking around register interactions.

Signed-off-by: Alba Mendez <me@alba.sh>
Reviewed-by: Janne Grunau <j@jannau.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Finkelstein <k@chaosmail.tech>
---
 drivers/spmi/spmi-apple-controller.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/spmi/spmi-apple-controller.c b/drivers/spmi/spmi-apple-controller.c
index 9843dc871d6c..fabccd25aa0d 100644
--- a/drivers/spmi/spmi-apple-controller.c
+++ b/drivers/spmi/spmi-apple-controller.c
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
 #include <linux/io.h>
 #include <linux/iopoll.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/mutex.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
 #include <linux/spmi.h>
 
@@ -39,6 +40,7 @@
 
 struct apple_spmi {
 	void __iomem *regs;
+	struct mutex fifo_lock;
 	bool prev_fail;
 };
 
@@ -78,6 +80,8 @@ static int spmi_raw_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid, u16 param,
 	size_t i = 0, j;
 	int ret;
 
+	guard(mutex)(&spmi->fifo_lock);
+
 	if (spmi->prev_fail) {
 		writel(SPMI_ACT_FIFO_FLUSH, spmi->regs + SPMI_ACT_REG);
 		spmi->prev_fail = false;
@@ -195,6 +199,7 @@ static int apple_spmi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	spmi = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
+	mutex_init(&spmi->fifo_lock);
 
 	spmi->regs = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
 	if (IS_ERR(spmi->regs))

-- 
2.56.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v11 6/6] spmi: apple: Add interrupt functionality
  2026-11-07 20:36 [PATCH v11 0/6] spmi: apple: Additional commands and interrupt support Sasha Finkelstein
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2026-11-07 20:36 ` [PATCH v11 5/6] spmi: apple: lock around FIFOs Sasha Finkelstein
@ 2026-11-07 20:36 ` Sasha Finkelstein
  2026-11-08  5:18   ` sashiko-bot
  5 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Finkelstein @ 2026-11-07 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sven Peter, Janne Grunau, Neal Gompa, Stephen Boyd, Rob Herring,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley
  Cc: asahi, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, devicetree,
	Sasha Finkelstein, Alba Mendez

From: Alba Mendez <me@alba.sh>

Add support for interrupts sent by slave devices and use IRQ for
RX FIFO if possible, as that IRQ fires as soon as the reply is
available, which is usually takes a few us instead of the 10ms sleep
interval for polling.

Signed-off-by: Alba Mendez <me@alba.sh>
Reviewed-by: Janne Grunau <j@jannau.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Finkelstein <k@chaosmail.tech>
---
 drivers/spmi/Kconfig                 |   3 +-
 drivers/spmi/spmi-apple-controller.c | 257 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 258 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spmi/Kconfig b/drivers/spmi/Kconfig
index a80cf4047b86..7243863a09b4 100644
--- a/drivers/spmi/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/spmi/Kconfig
@@ -13,7 +13,8 @@ if SPMI
 
 config SPMI_APPLE
 	tristate "Apple SoC SPMI Controller platform driver"
-	depends on ARCH_APPLE || COMPILE_TEST
+	select IRQ_DOMAIN_HIERARCHY
+	depends on ARCH_APPLE || (COMPILE_TEST && 64BIT)
 	help
 	  If you say yes to this option, support will be included for the
 	  SPMI controller present on many Apple SoCs, including the
diff --git a/drivers/spmi/spmi-apple-controller.c b/drivers/spmi/spmi-apple-controller.c
index fabccd25aa0d..2390174452ab 100644
--- a/drivers/spmi/spmi-apple-controller.c
+++ b/drivers/spmi/spmi-apple-controller.c
@@ -13,11 +13,17 @@
 
 #include <linux/bitfield.h>
 #include <linux/bits.h>
+#include <linux/completion.h>
+#include <linux/interrupt.h>
 #include <linux/io.h>
 #include <linux/iopoll.h>
+#include <linux/irq.h>
+#include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h>
+#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/mutex.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/spinlock.h>
 #include <linux/spmi.h>
 
 /* SPMI Controller Registers */
@@ -26,6 +32,13 @@
 #define SPMI_RSP_REG 0x8
 #define SPMI_ACT_REG 0xa4
 
+#define SPMI_IRQ_MASK_BASE 0x20
+#define SPMI_IRQ_ACK_BASE 0x60
+#define SPMI_NUM_PERIPHERAL_IRQS 256
+#define SPMI_NUM_IRQS (SPMI_NUM_PERIPHERAL_IRQS + 32)
+
+#define SPMI_IRQ_NOTIFY 256
+
 /* SPMI_RSP_REG reply word */
 #define SPMI_REPLY_FRAME_PARITY_STATUS GENMASK(31, 16)
 #define SPMI_REPLY_ACK BIT(15)
@@ -41,6 +54,12 @@
 struct apple_spmi {
 	void __iomem *regs;
 	struct mutex fifo_lock;
+	struct completion fifo_rx;
+	struct irq_domain *irqd;
+	raw_spinlock_t irq_mask_lock;
+	DECLARE_BITMAP(irq_mask_cache, SPMI_NUM_PERIPHERAL_IRQS);
+	int irq;
+	bool notify_irq;
 	bool prev_fail;
 };
 
@@ -48,6 +67,56 @@ struct apple_spmi {
 	readl_poll_timeout((spmi)->regs + (reg), (val), (cond), \
 			   REG_POLL_INTERVAL_US, REG_POLL_TIMEOUT_US)
 
+static void apple_spmi_irq_ack_raw(struct apple_spmi *spmi, u32 irq)
+{
+	u32 __iomem *reg = spmi->regs + SPMI_IRQ_ACK_BASE + (irq / 32) * 4;
+
+	writel(BIT(irq % 32), reg);
+}
+
+static void apple_spmi_irq_mask_raw(struct apple_spmi *spmi, u32 irq)
+{
+	u32 __iomem *reg = spmi->regs + SPMI_IRQ_MASK_BASE + (irq / 32) * 4;
+
+	writel(readl(reg) & ~BIT(irq % 32), reg);
+}
+
+static void apple_spmi_irq_unmask_raw(struct apple_spmi *spmi, u32 irq)
+{
+	u32 __iomem *reg = spmi->regs + SPMI_IRQ_MASK_BASE + (irq / 32) * 4;
+
+	writel(readl(reg) | BIT(irq % 32), reg);
+}
+
+static void apple_spmi_irq_ack(struct irq_data *d)
+{
+	struct apple_spmi *spmi = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+
+	apple_spmi_irq_ack_raw(spmi, d->hwirq);
+}
+
+static void apple_spmi_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
+{
+	struct apple_spmi *spmi = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&spmi->irq_mask_lock, flags);
+	apple_spmi_irq_mask_raw(spmi, d->hwirq);
+	clear_bit(d->hwirq, spmi->irq_mask_cache);
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&spmi->irq_mask_lock, flags);
+}
+
+static void apple_spmi_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
+{
+	struct apple_spmi *spmi = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&spmi->irq_mask_lock, flags);
+	set_bit(d->hwirq, spmi->irq_mask_cache);
+	apple_spmi_irq_unmask_raw(spmi, d->hwirq);
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&spmi->irq_mask_lock, flags);
+}
+
 static inline u32 apple_spmi_pack_cmd(u8 opc, u8 sid, u16 param)
 {
 	return opc | sid << 8 | (u32)param << 16 | (1 << 15);
@@ -60,7 +129,19 @@ static int apple_spmi_wait_rx_not_empty(struct spmi_controller *ctrl)
 	int ret;
 	u32 status;
 
-	ret = poll_reg(spmi, SPMI_STATUS_REG, status, !(status & SPMI_RX_FIFO_EMPTY));
+	if (spmi->notify_irq) {
+		ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&spmi->fifo_rx,
+			usecs_to_jiffies(REG_POLL_TIMEOUT_US));
+		if (!ret)
+			ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
+		else if (readl(spmi->regs + SPMI_STATUS_REG) & SPMI_RX_FIFO_EMPTY)
+			ret = -EIO;
+		else
+			ret = 0;
+	} else {
+		ret = poll_reg(spmi, SPMI_STATUS_REG, status, !(status & SPMI_RX_FIFO_EMPTY));
+	}
+
 	if (ret) {
 		spmi->prev_fail = true;
 		dev_err(&ctrl->dev,
@@ -84,8 +165,10 @@ static int spmi_raw_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid, u16 param,
 
 	if (spmi->prev_fail) {
 		writel(SPMI_ACT_FIFO_FLUSH, spmi->regs + SPMI_ACT_REG);
+		apple_spmi_irq_ack_raw(spmi, SPMI_IRQ_NOTIFY);
 		spmi->prev_fail = false;
 	}
+	reinit_completion(&spmi->fifo_rx);
 
 	writel(spmi_cmd, spmi->regs + SPMI_CMD_REG);
 
@@ -188,6 +271,167 @@ static int spmi_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid)
 	return -EINVAL;
 }
 
+static int apple_spmi_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
+{
+	/* all interrupts have MSI semantics */
+	return type == IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING ? 0 : -EINVAL;
+}
+
+static struct irq_chip apple_spmi_irq_chip = {
+	.name = "apple_spmi",
+	.irq_mask = apple_spmi_irq_mask,
+	.irq_unmask = apple_spmi_irq_unmask,
+	.irq_ack = apple_spmi_irq_ack,
+	.irq_set_type = apple_spmi_irq_set_type,
+	.flags = IRQCHIP_ONESHOT_SAFE,
+};
+
+static int apple_spmi_irq_domain_map(struct irq_domain *irqd,
+					unsigned int irq, irq_hw_number_t hw)
+{
+	irq_domain_set_info(irqd, irq, hw, &apple_spmi_irq_chip, irqd->host_data,
+				handle_edge_irq, NULL, NULL);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int apple_spmi_irq_domain_translate(struct irq_domain *irqd,
+					struct irq_fwspec *fwspec,
+					unsigned long *hwirq,
+					unsigned int *type)
+{
+	u32 *args = fwspec->param;
+
+	if (fwspec->param_count != 2)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if (args[0] >= SPMI_NUM_PERIPHERAL_IRQS)
+		return -EINVAL;
+	*hwirq = args[0];
+	*type = args[1] & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int apple_spmi_irq_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *irqd, unsigned int virq,
+				unsigned int nr_irqs, void *arg)
+{
+	unsigned int type = IRQ_TYPE_NONE;
+	struct irq_fwspec *fwspec = arg;
+	irq_hw_number_t hwirq;
+	int i, ret;
+
+	ret = apple_spmi_irq_domain_translate(irqd, fwspec, &hwirq, &type);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	if (hwirq + nr_irqs > SPMI_NUM_PERIPHERAL_IRQS)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < nr_irqs; i++) {
+		ret = apple_spmi_irq_domain_map(irqd, virq + i, hwirq + i);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void apple_spmi_irq_domain_free(struct irq_domain *irqd, unsigned int virq,
+				unsigned int nr_irqs)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < nr_irqs; i++) {
+		struct irq_data *d = irq_domain_get_irq_data(irqd, virq + i);
+
+		irq_set_handler(virq + i, NULL);
+		irq_domain_reset_irq_data(d);
+	}
+}
+
+static const struct irq_domain_ops apple_spmi_irq_domain_ops = {
+	.translate	= apple_spmi_irq_domain_translate,
+	.alloc		= apple_spmi_irq_domain_alloc,
+	.free		= apple_spmi_irq_domain_free,
+};
+
+static void apple_spmi_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
+{
+	struct apple_spmi *spmi = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
+	struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
+	bool handled = false;
+	unsigned long val, offset, bit;
+
+	chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
+	val = readl(spmi->regs + SPMI_IRQ_ACK_BASE + (SPMI_IRQ_NOTIFY / 32) * 4);
+	if (val & BIT(SPMI_IRQ_NOTIFY % 32)) {
+		apple_spmi_irq_ack_raw(spmi, SPMI_IRQ_NOTIFY);
+		complete(&spmi->fifo_rx);
+		handled = true;
+	}
+
+	for (offset = 0; offset < SPMI_NUM_PERIPHERAL_IRQS / 8; offset += sizeof(val)) {
+		val = readq(spmi->regs + SPMI_IRQ_ACK_BASE + offset);
+		/**
+		 * because of other masters in the bus, we're going to get a multitude of
+		 * interrupts we're not interested in. irq_resolve_mapping isn't very
+		 * optimized for the nonexistent path, so instead we mask with (a locally
+		 * cached version of) the IRQ mask
+		 */
+		val &= spmi->irq_mask_cache[offset / sizeof(val)];
+		for_each_set_bit(bit, &val, 64) {
+			generic_handle_domain_irq(spmi->irqd, offset * 8 + bit);
+			handled = true;
+		}
+	}
+	if (!handled)
+		handle_bad_irq(desc);
+	chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
+}
+
+static void apple_spmi_teardown_irq(void *data)
+{
+	struct apple_spmi *spmi = data;
+
+	for (size_t offset = 0; offset < SPMI_NUM_IRQS / 8; offset += 4)
+		writel(0, spmi->regs + SPMI_IRQ_MASK_BASE + offset);
+
+	synchronize_irq(spmi->irq);
+	irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(spmi->irq, NULL, NULL);
+}
+
+static int apple_spmi_init_irq(struct platform_device *pdev,
+			       struct apple_spmi *spmi, int irq)
+{
+	int ret;
+	struct irq_domain_info info = {
+		.fwnode		= pdev->dev.fwnode,
+		.hwirq_max	= ~0U,
+		.ops		= &apple_spmi_irq_domain_ops,
+		.host_data	= spmi,
+	};
+
+	raw_spin_lock_init(&spmi->irq_mask_lock);
+
+	for (size_t offset = 0; offset < SPMI_NUM_IRQS / 8; offset += 4) {
+		writel(0, spmi->regs + SPMI_IRQ_MASK_BASE + offset);
+		writel(U32_MAX, spmi->regs + SPMI_IRQ_ACK_BASE + offset);
+	}
+
+	spmi->irqd = devm_irq_domain_instantiate(&pdev->dev, &info);
+	if (IS_ERR(spmi->irqd))
+		return PTR_ERR(spmi->irqd);
+
+	ret = devm_add_action(&pdev->dev, apple_spmi_teardown_irq, spmi);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(spmi->irq, apple_spmi_irq_handler, spmi);
+	apple_spmi_irq_unmask_raw(spmi, SPMI_IRQ_NOTIFY);
+	spmi->notify_irq = true;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int apple_spmi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct apple_spmi *spmi;
@@ -200,6 +444,8 @@ static int apple_spmi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	spmi = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
 	mutex_init(&spmi->fifo_lock);
+	init_completion(&spmi->fifo_rx);
+	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, spmi);
 
 	spmi->regs = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
 	if (IS_ERR(spmi->regs))
@@ -211,6 +457,15 @@ static int apple_spmi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	ctrl->write_cmd = spmi_write_cmd;
 	ctrl->cmd = spmi_cmd;
 
+	spmi->irq = platform_get_irq_optional(pdev, 0);
+	if (spmi->irq < 0 && spmi->irq != -ENXIO)
+		return spmi->irq;
+	if (spmi->irq >= 0) {
+		ret = apple_spmi_init_irq(pdev, spmi, spmi->irq);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+	}
+
 	ret = devm_spmi_controller_add(&pdev->dev, ctrl);
 	if (ret)
 		return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret,

-- 
2.56.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v11 5/6] spmi: apple: lock around FIFOs
  2026-11-07 20:36 ` [PATCH v11 5/6] spmi: apple: lock around FIFOs Sasha Finkelstein
@ 2026-11-08  4:59   ` sashiko-bot
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: sashiko-bot @ 2026-11-08  4:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sasha Finkelstein; +Cc: devicetree, robh, conor+dt

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue to consider:
- [Low] spmi: apple: missing Fixes trailer for FIFO locking in
  spmi_raw_cmd()
--

commit d27b65725fd5286319f9551943331b7836effecd
Author: Alba Mendez <me@alba.sh>

> spmi: apple: lock around FIFOs
>
> The driver was missing locking around register interactions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alba Mendez <me@alba.sh>
> Reviewed-by: Janne Grunau <j@jannau.net>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Finkelstein <k@chaosmail.tech>

[Severity: Low]
The SPMI core invokes controller callbacks without controller-wide
serialization, so concurrent register accesses have been unserialized
since the driver was introduced.  Should this include:

  Fixes: 77ca75e80c71 ("spmi: add a spmi driver for Apple SoC")

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261107-t603x-spmi-v11-0-322490215f58@chaosmail.tech?part=5

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v11 6/6] spmi: apple: Add interrupt functionality
  2026-11-07 20:36 ` [PATCH v11 6/6] spmi: apple: Add interrupt functionality Sasha Finkelstein
@ 2026-11-08  5:18   ` sashiko-bot
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: sashiko-bot @ 2026-11-08  5:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sasha Finkelstein; +Cc: devicetree, robh, conor+dt

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential
issues to consider:
- [Medium] spmi: apple: dispose of IRQ mappings before domain removal on
  teardown
- [Medium] spmi: apple: race between spmi_raw_cmd() recovery and
  apple_spmi_irq_handler()
--

commit 6198d2cd56367a5447522a621c1df79777ba3ad6
Author: Alba Mendez <me@alba.sh>

spmi: apple: Add interrupt functionality

This commit adds an IRQ domain for SPMI peripheral interrupts and uses the
controller's RX FIFO notification IRQ instead of polling when an interrupt
is available.

> diff --git a/drivers/spmi/spmi-apple-controller.c b/drivers/spmi/spmi-apple-controller.c
> index fabccd25aa0da..2390174452ab4 100644
> --- a/drivers/spmi/spmi-apple-controller.c
> +++ b/drivers/spmi/spmi-apple-controller.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -84,8 +165,10 @@ static int spmi_raw_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid, u16 param,
>  
>  	if (spmi->prev_fail) {
>  		writel(SPMI_ACT_FIFO_FLUSH, spmi->regs + SPMI_ACT_REG);
> +		apple_spmi_irq_ack_raw(spmi, SPMI_IRQ_NOTIFY);
>  		spmi->prev_fail = false;
>  	}
> +	reinit_completion(&spmi->fifo_rx);
>  
>  	writel(spmi_cmd, spmi->regs + SPMI_CMD_REG);

[Severity: Medium]
Can a late SPMI_IRQ_NOTIFY interrupt from a timed-out transaction race with
this recovery path and complete spmi->fifo_rx prematurely?

SPMI_IRQ_NOTIFY remains unmasked when wait_for_completion_timeout() times
out in apple_spmi_wait_rx_not_empty() and sets spmi->prev_fail.  When the
next command enters spmi_raw_cmd():

CPU0                              CPU1 (<hardirq>)
spmi_raw_cmd()
  if (spmi->prev_fail)
    writel(SPMI_ACT_FIFO_FLUSH, ...)
                                  apple_spmi_irq_handler()
                                    val = readl(... + SPMI_IRQ_ACK_BASE + ...)
    apple_spmi_irq_ack_raw(...)
  reinit_completion(&spmi->fifo_rx)
                                    complete(&spmi->fifo_rx)
  writel(spmi_cmd, ...)
  apple_spmi_wait_rx_not_empty()
    wait_for_completion_timeout() <-- returns immediately

The new command then wakes before its reply arrives, sees SPMI_RX_FIFO_EMPTY
(or reads a stale reply if the hardware answered just after the flush), and
fails with -EIO.

[ ... ]

> +static void apple_spmi_teardown_irq(void *data)
> +{
> +	struct apple_spmi *spmi = data;
> +
> +	for (size_t offset = 0; offset < SPMI_NUM_IRQS / 8; offset += 4)
> +		writel(0, spmi->regs + SPMI_IRQ_MASK_BASE + offset);
> +
> +	synchronize_irq(spmi->irq);
> +	irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(spmi->irq, NULL, NULL);
> +}
> +
> +static int apple_spmi_init_irq(struct platform_device *pdev,
> +			       struct apple_spmi *spmi, int irq)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +	struct irq_domain_info info = {
> +		.fwnode		= pdev->dev.fwnode,
> +		.hwirq_max	= ~0U,
> +		.ops		= &apple_spmi_irq_domain_ops,
> +		.host_data	= spmi,
> +	};
> +
> +	raw_spin_lock_init(&spmi->irq_mask_lock);
> +
> +	for (size_t offset = 0; offset < SPMI_NUM_IRQS / 8; offset += 4) {
> +		writel(0, spmi->regs + SPMI_IRQ_MASK_BASE + offset);
> +		writel(U32_MAX, spmi->regs + SPMI_IRQ_ACK_BASE + offset);
> +	}
> +
> +	spmi->irqd = devm_irq_domain_instantiate(&pdev->dev, &info);
> +	if (IS_ERR(spmi->irqd))
> +		return PTR_ERR(spmi->irqd);
> +
> +	ret = devm_add_action(&pdev->dev, apple_spmi_teardown_irq, spmi);

[Severity: Medium]
Does apple_spmi_teardown_irq() leave mapped peripheral IRQs in spmi->irqd
when the controller is unbound?

Unregistering child SPMI devices frees their irqactions, but does not call
irq_dispose_mapping().  When devm_irq_domain_remove() runs right after
apple_spmi_teardown_irq(), spmi->irqd->revmap_tree still holds any mapped
hwirqs, which triggers WARN_ON(!radix_tree_empty(&domain->revmap_tree)) in
irq_domain_remove(), leaks the allocated virq descriptors, and leaves their
irq_data pointing to the freed spmi->irqd and spmi structures.

Disposing of existing mappings with irq_dispose_mapping(irq_find_mapping())
across 0..SPMI_NUM_PERIPHERAL_IRQS - 1 in apple_spmi_teardown_irq() (and
setting info.size and info.hwirq_max to SPMI_NUM_PERIPHERAL_IRQS) would
avoid this.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261107-t603x-spmi-v11-0-322490215f58@chaosmail.tech?part=6

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-11-08  5:18 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-11-07 20:36 [PATCH v11 0/6] spmi: apple: Additional commands and interrupt support Sasha Finkelstein
2026-11-07 20:36 ` [PATCH v11 1/6] dt-bindings: spmi: apple,spmi: Add t603x and t8122 Sasha Finkelstein
2026-11-07 20:36 ` [PATCH v11 2/6] spmi: apple: Validate FIFO state Sasha Finkelstein
2026-11-07 20:36 ` [PATCH v11 3/6] spmi: apple: check transaction status Sasha Finkelstein
2026-11-07 20:36 ` [PATCH v11 4/6] spmi: apple: Implement remaining commands Sasha Finkelstein
2026-11-07 20:36 ` [PATCH v11 5/6] spmi: apple: lock around FIFOs Sasha Finkelstein
2026-11-08  4:59   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07 20:36 ` [PATCH v11 6/6] spmi: apple: Add interrupt functionality Sasha Finkelstein
2026-11-08  5:18   ` sashiko-bot

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox