Linux Documentation
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
	 Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	 Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,  Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>
Cc: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>, Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>,
	 Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>,
	 Jean-Philippe Brucker <jpb@kernel.org>,
	 linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	 Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	 Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v12 08/29] KVM: arm64: Rename SVE finalization constants to be more general
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2026 19:27:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260709-kvm-arm64-sme-v12-8-d0301d79ef58@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260709-kvm-arm64-sme-v12-0-d0301d79ef58@kernel.org>

Due to the overlap between SVE and SME vector length configuration
created by streaming mode SVE we will finalize both at once.  Rename the
existing finalization to use _VEC (vector) for the naming to avoid
confusion.

Since this includes the userspace API we create an alias
KVM_ARM_VCPU_VEC for the existing KVM_ARM_VCPU_SVE capability, existing
code which does not enable SME will be unaffected and any SME only code
will not need to use SVE constants.

No functional change.

Reviewed-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jpb@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  8 +++++---
 arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h |  6 ++++++
 arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c            | 12 ++++++------
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/pkvm.c    |  2 +-
 arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c            | 20 ++++++++++----------
 5 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index bae2c4f92ef5..8b746b1a1e53 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -1037,8 +1037,8 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
 
 /* KVM_ARM_VCPU_INIT completed */
 #define VCPU_INITIALIZED	__vcpu_single_flag(cflags, BIT(0))
-/* SVE config completed */
-#define VCPU_SVE_FINALIZED	__vcpu_single_flag(cflags, BIT(1))
+/* Vector config completed */
+#define VCPU_VEC_FINALIZED	__vcpu_single_flag(cflags, BIT(1))
 /* pKVM VCPU setup completed */
 #define VCPU_PKVM_FINALIZED	__vcpu_single_flag(cflags, BIT(2))
 
@@ -1133,6 +1133,8 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
 #define vcpu_has_sve(vcpu)	kvm_has_sve((vcpu)->kvm)
 #endif
 
+#define vcpu_has_vec(vcpu) vcpu_has_sve(vcpu)
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH
 #define vcpu_has_ptrauth(vcpu)						\
 	((cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_HAS_ADDRESS_AUTH) ||		\
@@ -1505,7 +1507,7 @@ struct kvm *kvm_arch_alloc_vm(void);
 int kvm_arm_vcpu_finalize(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int feature);
 bool kvm_arm_vcpu_is_finalized(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 
-#define kvm_arm_vcpu_sve_finalized(vcpu) vcpu_get_flag(vcpu, VCPU_SVE_FINALIZED)
+#define kvm_arm_vcpu_vec_finalized(vcpu) vcpu_get_flag(vcpu, VCPU_VEC_FINALIZED)
 
 #define kvm_has_mte(kvm)					\
 	(system_supports_mte() &&				\
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
index 1c13bfa2d38a..83af99ca4e1b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
@@ -107,6 +107,12 @@ struct kvm_regs {
 #define KVM_ARM_VCPU_HAS_EL2		7 /* Support nested virtualization */
 #define KVM_ARM_VCPU_HAS_EL2_E2H0	8 /* Limit NV support to E2H RES0 */
 
+/*
+ * An alias for _SVE since we finalize VL configuration for both SVE and SME
+ * simultaneously.
+ */
+#define KVM_ARM_VCPU_VEC		KVM_ARM_VCPU_SVE
+
 struct kvm_vcpu_init {
 	__u32 target;
 	__u32 features[7];
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
index b01d6622b872..0b789f73bf7c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
@@ -342,7 +342,7 @@ static int set_sve_vls(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg)
 	if (!vcpu_has_sve(vcpu))
 		return -ENOENT;
 
-	if (kvm_arm_vcpu_sve_finalized(vcpu))
+	if (kvm_arm_vcpu_vec_finalized(vcpu))
 		return -EPERM; /* too late! */
 
 	if (WARN_ON(vcpu->arch.sve_state))
@@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ static int set_sve_vls(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg)
 	if (max_vq < SVE_VQ_MIN)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	/* vcpu->arch.sve_state will be alloc'd by kvm_vcpu_finalize_sve() */
+	/* vcpu->arch.sve_state will be alloc'd by kvm_vcpu_finalize_vec() */
 	vcpu->arch.sve_max_vl = sve_vl_from_vq(max_vq);
 
 	return 0;
@@ -497,7 +497,7 @@ static int get_sve_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg)
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	if (!kvm_arm_vcpu_sve_finalized(vcpu))
+	if (!kvm_arm_vcpu_vec_finalized(vcpu))
 		return -EPERM;
 
 	if (copy_to_user(uptr, (void *)vcpu->arch.sve_state + region.koffset,
@@ -523,7 +523,7 @@ static int set_sve_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg)
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	if (!kvm_arm_vcpu_sve_finalized(vcpu))
+	if (!kvm_arm_vcpu_vec_finalized(vcpu))
 		return -EPERM;
 
 	if (copy_from_user((void *)vcpu->arch.sve_state + region.koffset, uptr,
@@ -599,7 +599,7 @@ static unsigned long num_sve_regs(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		return 0;
 
 	/* Policed by KVM_GET_REG_LIST: */
-	WARN_ON(!kvm_arm_vcpu_sve_finalized(vcpu));
+	WARN_ON(!kvm_arm_vcpu_vec_finalized(vcpu));
 
 	return slices * (SVE_NUM_PREGS + SVE_NUM_ZREGS + 1 /* FFR */)
 		+ 1; /* KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_VLS */
@@ -617,7 +617,7 @@ static int copy_sve_reg_indices(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 		return 0;
 
 	/* Policed by KVM_GET_REG_LIST: */
-	WARN_ON(!kvm_arm_vcpu_sve_finalized(vcpu));
+	WARN_ON(!kvm_arm_vcpu_vec_finalized(vcpu));
 
 	/*
 	 * Enumerate this first, so that userspace can save/restore in
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/pkvm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/pkvm.c
index 3b2c4fbc34d8..9d7f632f01f8 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/pkvm.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/pkvm.c
@@ -454,7 +454,7 @@ static int pkvm_vcpu_init_sve(struct pkvm_hyp_vcpu *hyp_vcpu, struct kvm_vcpu *h
 	int ret = 0;
 
 	if (!vcpu_has_feature(vcpu, KVM_ARM_VCPU_SVE)) {
-		vcpu_clear_flag(vcpu, VCPU_SVE_FINALIZED);
+		vcpu_clear_flag(vcpu, VCPU_VEC_FINALIZED);
 		return 0;
 	}
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
index b963fd975aac..0fae62a9eaef 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ static void kvm_vcpu_enable_sve(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
  * Finalize vcpu's maximum SVE vector length, allocating
  * vcpu->arch.sve_state as necessary.
  */
-static int kvm_vcpu_finalize_sve(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+static int kvm_vcpu_finalize_vec(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	void *buf;
 	unsigned int vl;
@@ -122,21 +122,21 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_finalize_sve(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	}
 	
 	vcpu->arch.sve_state = buf;
-	vcpu_set_flag(vcpu, VCPU_SVE_FINALIZED);
+	vcpu_set_flag(vcpu, VCPU_VEC_FINALIZED);
 	return 0;
 }
 
 int kvm_arm_vcpu_finalize(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int feature)
 {
 	switch (feature) {
-	case KVM_ARM_VCPU_SVE:
-		if (!vcpu_has_sve(vcpu))
+	case KVM_ARM_VCPU_VEC:
+		if (!vcpu_has_vec(vcpu))
 			return -EINVAL;
 
-		if (kvm_arm_vcpu_sve_finalized(vcpu))
+		if (kvm_arm_vcpu_vec_finalized(vcpu))
 			return -EPERM;
 
-		return kvm_vcpu_finalize_sve(vcpu);
+		return kvm_vcpu_finalize_vec(vcpu);
 	}
 
 	return -EINVAL;
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ int kvm_arm_vcpu_finalize(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int feature)
 
 bool kvm_arm_vcpu_is_finalized(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
-	if (vcpu_has_sve(vcpu) && !kvm_arm_vcpu_sve_finalized(vcpu))
+	if (vcpu_has_vec(vcpu) && !kvm_arm_vcpu_vec_finalized(vcpu))
 		return false;
 
 	return true;
@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ void kvm_arm_vcpu_destroy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	kfree(vcpu->arch.ccsidr);
 }
 
-static void kvm_vcpu_reset_sve(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+static void kvm_vcpu_reset_vec(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	if (vcpu_has_sve(vcpu))
 		memset(vcpu->arch.sve_state, 0, vcpu_sve_state_size(vcpu));
@@ -203,11 +203,11 @@ void kvm_reset_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	if (loaded)
 		kvm_arch_vcpu_put(vcpu);
 
-	if (!kvm_arm_vcpu_sve_finalized(vcpu)) {
+	if (!kvm_arm_vcpu_vec_finalized(vcpu)) {
 		if (vcpu_has_feature(vcpu, KVM_ARM_VCPU_SVE))
 			kvm_vcpu_enable_sve(vcpu);
 	} else {
-		kvm_vcpu_reset_sve(vcpu);
+		kvm_vcpu_reset_vec(vcpu);
 	}
 
 	if (vcpu_el1_is_32bit(vcpu))

-- 
2.47.3


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-09 18:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-09 18:27 [PATCH v12 00/29] KVM: arm64: Implement support for SME Mark Brown
2026-07-09 18:27 ` [PATCH v12 01/29] arm64/sysreg: Define full value read/modify/write helpers Mark Brown
2026-07-09 18:27 ` [PATCH v12 02/29] arm64/fpsimd: Update FA64 and ZT0 enables when loading SME state Mark Brown
2026-07-09 18:27 ` [PATCH v12 03/29] arm64/fpsimd: Decide to save ZT0 and streaming mode FFR at bind time Mark Brown
2026-07-09 18:27 ` [PATCH v12 04/29] arm64/sve: Factor virtualizable VL discovery out of SVE specific code Mark Brown
2026-07-09 18:27 ` [PATCH v12 05/29] arm64/fpsimd: Determine maximum virtualisable SME vector length Mark Brown
2026-07-09 18:27 ` [PATCH v12 06/29] KVM: arm64: Handle FEAT_IDST for guest accesses to hidden registers Mark Brown
2026-07-09 18:27 ` [PATCH v12 07/29] KVM: arm64: Pull ctxt_has_ helpers to start of sysreg-sr.h Mark Brown
2026-07-09 18:27 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2026-07-09 18:27 ` [PATCH v12 09/29] KVM: arm64: Define internal features for SME Mark Brown
2026-07-09 18:27 ` [PATCH v12 10/29] KVM: arm64: Rename sve_state_reg_region Mark Brown
2026-07-09 18:27 ` [PATCH v12 11/29] KVM: arm64: Store vector lengths in an array Mark Brown
2026-07-09 18:27 ` [PATCH v12 12/29] KVM: arm64: Factor SVE code out of fpsimd_lazy_switch_to_host() Mark Brown
2026-07-09 18:27 ` [PATCH v12 13/29] KVM: arm64: Document the KVM ABI for SME Mark Brown
2026-07-09 18:27 ` [PATCH v12 14/29] KVM: arm64: Implement SME vector length configuration Mark Brown
2026-07-09 18:27 ` [PATCH v12 15/29] KVM: arm64: Support SME control registers Mark Brown
2026-07-09 18:27 ` [PATCH v12 16/29] KVM: arm64: Support TPIDR2_EL0 Mark Brown
2026-07-09 18:27 ` [PATCH v12 17/29] KVM: arm64: Support SME identification registers for guests Mark Brown
2026-07-09 18:27 ` [PATCH v12 18/29] KVM: arm64: Support SME priority registers Mark Brown
2026-07-09 18:27 ` [PATCH v12 19/29] KVM: arm64: Support userspace access to streaming mode Z and P registers Mark Brown
2026-07-09 18:27 ` [PATCH v12 20/29] KVM: arm64: Flush register state on writes to SVCR.SM and SVCR.ZA Mark Brown
2026-07-09 18:27 ` [PATCH v12 21/29] KVM: arm64: Expose SME specific state to userspace Mark Brown
2026-07-09 18:27 ` [PATCH v12 22/29] KVM: arm64: Context switch SME state for guests Mark Brown
2026-07-09 18:27 ` [PATCH v12 23/29] KVM: arm64: Handle SME exceptions Mark Brown
2026-07-09 18:27 ` [PATCH v12 24/29] KVM: arm64: Expose SME to nested guests Mark Brown
2026-07-09 18:27 ` [PATCH v12 25/29] KVM: arm64: Provide interface for configuring and enabling SME for guests Mark Brown
2026-07-09 18:27 ` [PATCH v12 26/29] KVM: arm64: selftests: Remove spurious check for single bit safe values Mark Brown
2026-07-09 18:27 ` [PATCH v12 27/29] KVM: arm64: selftests: Skip impossible invalid value tests Mark Brown
2026-07-09 18:27 ` [PATCH v12 28/29] KVM: arm64: selftests: Add SME system registers to get-reg-list Mark Brown
2026-07-09 18:27 ` [PATCH v12 29/29] KVM: arm64: selftests: Add SME to set_id_regs test Mark Brown
2026-07-10  8:43 ` [PATCH v12 00/29] KVM: arm64: Implement support for SME Fuad Tabba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260709-kvm-arm64-sme-v12-8-d0301d79ef58@kernel.org \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
    --cc=ben.horgan@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=jpb@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oupton@kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=tabba@google.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox