* [PATCH v8 0/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Tegra264 invalidation workaround
@ 2026-07-22 10:20 Ashish Mhetre
2026-07-22 10:20 ` [PATCH v8 1/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Factor out CMDQ batch force-sync conditions Ashish Mhetre
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ashish Mhetre @ 2026-07-22 10:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: catalin.marinas, will, corbet, skhan, robin.murphy, joro,
nicolinc, jgg
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-doc, linux-kernel, iommu, linux-tegra,
Ashish Mhetre
Nvidia Tegra264 SMMUs are affected by an erratum where a TLB entry can
survive an invalidation that races with concurrent traffic targeting
the same entry. The hardware-recommended software workaround is to
issue every CFGI/TLBI command (each followed by CMD_SYNC) twice.
The second issue must execute only after the first issue's CMD_SYNC
has completed, giving the sequence:
TLBI/CFGI ... CMD_SYNC TLBI/CFGI ... CMD_SYNC
ATC_INV is not affected and must not be doubled.
The erratum is not flagged by any SMMUv3 IDR/IIDR register, so it
cannot be detected from hardware ID. Tegra264 is device-tree-only
(no ACPI/IORT support), so detection is purely by compatible string.
This series is structured as a small refactor + infrastructure + enable
sequence so that each step is reviewable in isolation:
1/3 Pure refactor (no functional change): lift the existing
force-sync conditions out of arm_smmu_cmdq_batch_add_cmd_p()
into a new arm_smmu_cmdq_batch_force_sync() helper, so that
adding another condition (in patch 2) is a one-line addition.
Authored by Nicolin Chen.
2/3 Add the workaround infrastructure without enabling it. Defines
the file-local arm_smmu_erratum_repeat_tlbi_cfgi_key static key
with an inline erratum description, the shared
arm_smmu_erratum_cmd_needs_repeating() predicate, the
arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist() wrapper that re-issues matching
cmdlists for host-internal callers, and the batch-helper
force-sync condition. The iommufd user-invalidation path keeps
issuing user commands exactly once via the raw
__arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist().
3/3 Enable the workaround for the existing "nvidia,tegra264-smmu"
compatible, document the erratum in silicon-errata.rst, and
report it to user space via a new
IOMMU_HW_INFO_ARM_SMMUV3_ERRATA_REPEAT_TLBI_CFGI hw_info flag so
a VMM/guest can apply the workaround to its own invalidations.
The series applies cleanly on linux-next/master (base-commit below).
Changes since v7:
- Rework the nesting/iommufd handling to report the erratum to user
space and stop repeating user-issued invalidations in the host.
- 2/3: drop arm_vsmmu_can_batch_cmd() and the iommufd batching split
it added. Expose __arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist() and make
arm_vsmmu_cache_invalidate() call it directly.
- 3/3: add the uapi flag + enum, report it from arm_smmu_hw_info()
via a new arm_smmu_erratum_repeat_tlbi_cfgi() accessor.
- Carry Jason Gunthorpe's Reviewed-by on 1/3 and 2/3, and Nicolin
Chen's Reviewed-by on 2/3. Drop earlier tags from 3/3 since it
gained the uapi/hw_info change; re-review appreciated.
Changes since v6:
- Add #include <linux/jump_label.h> now that the static key is
defined in arm-smmu-v3.c.
- Drop the unused smmu parameter from arm_vsmmu_can_batch_cmd().
- Expand the arm_smmu_cmdq_batch_force_sync() comment to note that
batches never mix CFGI/TLBI with other commands, so checking
cmds[0] alone is enough.
- Note in 3/3 that a guest kernel enabling CMDQV on Tegra264 must
also apply this workaround, since guest-level VCMDQs issue
commands directly to the hardware.
- Carry Reviewed-by: Nicolin Chen on 2/3 and 3/3.
Changes since v5:
- Move arm_smmu_erratum_cmd_needs_repeating() into arm-smmu-v3.c
and leave a declaration-only stub in arm-smmu-v3.h. Make
arm_smmu_erratum_repeat_tlbi_cfgi_key file-local static.
- Add an inline erratum/workaround description at the static key,
referenced from arm_smmu_cmdq_batch_force_sync().
- Fix (rather than drop) the misleading !n comment above
arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist(); keep the defensive !n guard.
- Remove the unused smmu parameter from the predicate.
- Tweak 2/3 commit-message wording ("commit" vs "patch").
Changes since v4:
- Drop ARM_SMMU_OPT_REPEAT_TLBI_CFGI entirely: the option bit was
set and read on the exact same "nvidia,tegra264-smmu" compatible
as the static key, so it added no per-instance signal that the
static key did not already carry. The predicate now gates purely
on arm_smmu_erratum_repeat_tlbi_cfgi_key.
- Reorder the series so the compatible-string detection lands
last, once all the infrastructure exists:
1/3 factor out force_sync helper (unchanged)
2/3 add static key + WAR functions (no functional change)
3/3 enable the key on nvidia,tegra264-smmu + silicon-errata
Split the old v4 "Detect" and "Issue twice" patches accordingly.
- Update the /* See ARM_SMMU_OPT_REPEAT_TLBI_CFGI */ comment inside
arm_smmu_cmdq_batch_force_sync() to reference the static key
description instead.
Changes since v3:
- Drop the cmds->num == 0 early-return so the refactor is
truly "no functional change".
- Rename ARM_SMMU_OPT_TLBI_TWICE -> ARM_SMMU_OPT_REPEAT_TLBI_CFGI
and rephrase its kdoc to be hardware-agnostic.
- Rename arm_smmu_cmd_needs_tlbi_twice() ->
arm_smmu_erratum_cmd_needs_repeating() and drop the kdoc
above it.
- Replace the explicit opcode switch with a single range check
opcode >= CMDQ_OP_CFGI_STE && opcode < CMDQ_OP_ATC_INV.
- Introduce arm_smmu_erratum_repeat_tlbi_cfgi_key static key:
the predicate gates on it first so unaffected kernels pay
only a single static_branch_unlikely() check.
- Drop the verbose Tegra264-specific comments above
arm_vsmmu_can_batch_cmd() and inside the batch helper.
- Document the erratum in
Documentation/arch/arm64/silicon-errata.rst.
- Guard the repeat path in arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist() with
an n > 0 check so cmds[0] is never inspected on an empty
cmdlist.
- Drop the carried Reviewed-by tags now that the patch
shape has changed; re-review appreciated.
Changes since v2:
- Split into a 3-patch series (refactor / detect / apply) to keep
each step small and bisectable.
- Move the classifier to arm-smmu-v3.h as static inline so the
iommufd file can share it.
- Add arm_vsmmu_can_batch_cmd() to split iommufd batches at
"needs repeating" transitions so the per-batch decision based
on the first command stays correct under mixed user input.
- Spell out in the commit message why detection is via DT and
not via IIDR/ACPI.
Changes since v1:
- Detect the erratum from the existing "nvidia,tegra264-smmu"
compatible instead of adding a new property.
- Centralise the doubling at the CMDQ submission layer and only
apply it to CFGI/TLBI (not ATC_INV).
- Drop the binding/dtsi patches accordingly.
Ashish Mhetre (2):
iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Introduce CFGI/TLBI-repeat workaround
infrastructure
iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Enable CFGI/TLBI-repeat workaround on Tegra264
Nicolin Chen (1):
iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Factor out CMDQ batch force-sync conditions
Documentation/arch/arm64/silicon-errata.rst | 2 +
.../arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-iommufd.c | 7 +-
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 89 +++++++---
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h | 6 ++
include/uapi/linux/iommufd.h | 12 ++-
5 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
base-commit: 0718283ab28bc3907e10b61a6b4be6fefa1cbb2f
--
2.50.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v8 1/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Factor out CMDQ batch force-sync conditions
2026-07-22 10:20 [PATCH v8 0/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Tegra264 invalidation workaround Ashish Mhetre
@ 2026-07-22 10:20 ` Ashish Mhetre
2026-07-22 10:20 ` [PATCH v8 2/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Introduce CFGI/TLBI-repeat workaround infrastructure Ashish Mhetre
2026-07-22 10:20 ` [PATCH v8 3/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Enable CFGI/TLBI-repeat workaround on Tegra264 Ashish Mhetre
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ashish Mhetre @ 2026-07-22 10:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: catalin.marinas, will, corbet, skhan, robin.murphy, joro,
nicolinc, jgg
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-doc, linux-kernel, iommu, linux-tegra,
Jason Gunthorpe, Ashish Mhetre
From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
arm_smmu_cmdq_batch_add_cmd_p() carries two distinct reasons for
flushing the current batch with a CMD_SYNC before appending the
new command:
- The batch's pre-assigned cmdq does not support the new command.
- The Arm erratum 2812531 workaround (ARM_SMMU_OPT_CMDQ_FORCE_SYNC)
forces a SYNC at one entry before the batch is full.
Lift those checks into a new arm_smmu_cmdq_batch_force_sync() helper
so that adding another force-sync condition becomes a one-line
addition. No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ashish Mhetre <amhetre@nvidia.com>
---
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 23 +++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
index 57b750ebcd3d..dd7475c50afc 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
@@ -847,16 +847,27 @@ static void arm_smmu_cmdq_batch_init_cmd(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
cmds->cmdq = arm_smmu_get_cmdq(smmu, cmd);
}
+static bool arm_smmu_cmdq_batch_force_sync(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
+ struct arm_smmu_cmdq_batch *cmds,
+ struct arm_smmu_cmd *cmd)
+{
+ /* The batch's pre-assigned cmdq doesn't support the new command */
+ if (!arm_smmu_cmdq_supports_cmd(cmds->cmdq, cmd))
+ return true;
+
+ /* Arm erratum 2812531 */
+ if (cmds->num == CMDQ_BATCH_ENTRIES - 1 &&
+ (smmu->options & ARM_SMMU_OPT_CMDQ_FORCE_SYNC))
+ return true;
+
+ return false;
+}
+
static void arm_smmu_cmdq_batch_add_cmd_p(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
struct arm_smmu_cmdq_batch *cmds,
struct arm_smmu_cmd *cmd)
{
- bool force_sync = (cmds->num == CMDQ_BATCH_ENTRIES - 1) &&
- (smmu->options & ARM_SMMU_OPT_CMDQ_FORCE_SYNC);
- bool unsupported_cmd;
-
- unsupported_cmd = !arm_smmu_cmdq_supports_cmd(cmds->cmdq, cmd);
- if (force_sync || unsupported_cmd) {
+ if (arm_smmu_cmdq_batch_force_sync(smmu, cmds, cmd)) {
arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist(smmu, cmds->cmdq, cmds->cmds,
cmds->num, true);
arm_smmu_cmdq_batch_init_cmd(smmu, cmds, cmd);
--
2.50.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v8 2/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Introduce CFGI/TLBI-repeat workaround infrastructure
2026-07-22 10:20 [PATCH v8 0/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Tegra264 invalidation workaround Ashish Mhetre
2026-07-22 10:20 ` [PATCH v8 1/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Factor out CMDQ batch force-sync conditions Ashish Mhetre
@ 2026-07-22 10:20 ` Ashish Mhetre
2026-07-22 19:02 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-07-22 10:20 ` [PATCH v8 3/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Enable CFGI/TLBI-repeat workaround on Tegra264 Ashish Mhetre
2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ashish Mhetre @ 2026-07-22 10:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: catalin.marinas, will, corbet, skhan, robin.murphy, joro,
nicolinc, jgg
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-doc, linux-kernel, iommu, linux-tegra,
Ashish Mhetre, Jason Gunthorpe
Tegra264 SMMU instances need every CFGI/TLBI command sequence issued
twice, with the second issue executing only after the first issue's
CMD_SYNC has completed:
TLBI/CFGI ... CMD_SYNC TLBI/CFGI ... CMD_SYNC
ATC_INV is not affected and must never be doubled.
Add arm_smmu_erratum_repeat_tlbi_cfgi_key and an
arm_smmu_erratum_cmd_needs_repeating() helper that gates on the static
key first and then range-checks the opcode (CFGI_STE .. ATC_INV), so
subsequent changes wiring the workaround into the CMDQ submission path
can share a single predicate.
Rename the existing arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist() to
__arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist() and add a thin wrapper of the original
name that re-issues the same cmdlist a second time when the predicate
fires. Host-internal callers go through the wrapper and get the repeat;
register the new condition with arm_smmu_cmdq_batch_force_sync() too.
The iommufd user-invalidation path (arm_vsmmu_cache_invalidate()) keeps
issuing user commands exactly once by calling the raw
__arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist(). The erratum is reported to user space
in a subsequent change so an affected guest doubles its own CFGI/TLBI,
doubling them again on the host would be wrong.
No callers enable the static key yet, so there is no functional change.
A subsequent change will enable the key on affected instances.
Suggested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ashish Mhetre <amhetre@nvidia.com>
---
.../arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-iommufd.c | 4 +-
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++--
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h | 5 ++
3 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-iommufd.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-iommufd.c
index 85ebfdb3d2a7..032d0c272f3f 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-iommufd.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-iommufd.c
@@ -400,8 +400,8 @@ int arm_vsmmu_cache_invalidate(struct iommufd_viommu *viommu,
continue;
/* FIXME always uses the main cmdq rather than trying to group by type */
- ret = arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist(smmu, &smmu->cmdq, &last->cmd,
- cur - last, true);
+ ret = __arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist(smmu, &smmu->cmdq, &last->cmd,
+ cur - last, true);
if (ret) {
cur--;
goto out;
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
index dd7475c50afc..f0f8b2daf8d5 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
#include <linux/io-pgtable.h>
#include <linux/iopoll.h>
+#include <linux/jump_label.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/msi.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
@@ -42,6 +43,14 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(disable_msipolling,
static const struct iommu_ops arm_smmu_ops;
static struct iommu_dirty_ops arm_smmu_dirty_ops;
+/*
+ * Repeat every {CFGI,TLBI};CMD_SYNC command sequence so that the second
+ * issue executes only after the first issue's CMD_SYNC has completed.
+ * Does not apply to ATC_INV. The key is global and is enabled from DT
+ * probe on affected hardware (currently Tegra264 only).
+ */
+static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(arm_smmu_erratum_repeat_tlbi_cfgi_key);
+
enum arm_smmu_msi_index {
EVTQ_MSI_INDEX,
GERROR_MSI_INDEX,
@@ -698,10 +707,10 @@ static void arm_smmu_cmdq_write_entries(struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq,
* insert their own list of commands then all of the commands from one
* CPU will appear before any of the commands from the other CPU.
*/
-int arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
- struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq,
- struct arm_smmu_cmd *cmds, int n,
- bool sync)
+int __arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
+ struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq,
+ struct arm_smmu_cmd *cmds, int n,
+ bool sync)
{
struct arm_smmu_cmd cmd_sync;
u32 prod;
@@ -820,6 +829,38 @@ int arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
return ret;
}
+bool arm_smmu_erratum_cmd_needs_repeating(struct arm_smmu_cmd *cmd)
+{
+ u8 opcode;
+
+ if (!static_branch_unlikely(&arm_smmu_erratum_repeat_tlbi_cfgi_key))
+ return false;
+
+ opcode = FIELD_GET(CMDQ_0_OP, cmd->data[0]);
+ return opcode >= CMDQ_OP_CFGI_STE && opcode < CMDQ_OP_ATC_INV;
+}
+
+int arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
+ struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq,
+ struct arm_smmu_cmd *cmds, int n,
+ bool sync)
+{
+ int ret = __arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist(smmu, cmdq, cmds, n, sync);
+
+ /*
+ * A bare CMD_SYNC can be issued with n == 0 (e.g. an empty
+ * batch_submit()), in which case there is no cmds[0] to inspect
+ * and nothing to repeat.
+ */
+ if (!n || ret || !sync)
+ return ret;
+
+ if (arm_smmu_erratum_cmd_needs_repeating(&cmds[0]))
+ ret = __arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist(smmu, cmdq, cmds, n, sync);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
static int arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmd_p(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
struct arm_smmu_cmd *cmd, bool sync)
{
@@ -860,6 +901,14 @@ static bool arm_smmu_cmdq_batch_force_sync(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
(smmu->options & ARM_SMMU_OPT_CMDQ_FORCE_SYNC))
return true;
+ /*
+ * See the description at arm_smmu_erratum_repeat_tlbi_cfgi_key. Batches
+ * never mix CFGI/TLBI with others, so checking cmds[0] alone is enough.
+ */
+ if (cmds->num == CMDQ_BATCH_ENTRIES &&
+ arm_smmu_erratum_cmd_needs_repeating(&cmds->cmds[0]))
+ return true;
+
return false;
}
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
index c909c9a88538..9508bf50d14c 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
@@ -1207,10 +1207,15 @@ void arm_smmu_attach_commit(struct arm_smmu_attach_state *state);
void arm_smmu_install_ste_for_dev(struct arm_smmu_master *master,
const struct arm_smmu_ste *target);
+int __arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
+ struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq,
+ struct arm_smmu_cmd *cmds, int n,
+ bool sync);
int arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq,
struct arm_smmu_cmd *cmds, int n,
bool sync);
+bool arm_smmu_erratum_cmd_needs_repeating(struct arm_smmu_cmd *cmd);
#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_SMMU_V3_SVA
bool arm_smmu_sva_supported(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu);
--
2.50.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v8 3/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Enable CFGI/TLBI-repeat workaround on Tegra264
2026-07-22 10:20 [PATCH v8 0/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Tegra264 invalidation workaround Ashish Mhetre
2026-07-22 10:20 ` [PATCH v8 1/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Factor out CMDQ batch force-sync conditions Ashish Mhetre
2026-07-22 10:20 ` [PATCH v8 2/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Introduce CFGI/TLBI-repeat workaround infrastructure Ashish Mhetre
@ 2026-07-22 10:20 ` Ashish Mhetre
2026-07-22 19:16 ` Nicolin Chen
2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ashish Mhetre @ 2026-07-22 10:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: catalin.marinas, will, corbet, skhan, robin.murphy, joro,
nicolinc, jgg
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-doc, linux-kernel, iommu, linux-tegra,
Ashish Mhetre
Nvidia Tegra264 SMMU is affected by an erratum where a TLB entry can
survive an invalidation that races with concurrent traffic targeting
the same entry. The hardware-recommended software workaround is to
issue every CFGI/TLBI command (each followed by CMD_SYNC) twice, and
that infrastructure is already in place behind
arm_smmu_erratum_repeat_tlbi_cfgi_key.
Neither IDR nor IIDR flags this Tegra264-specific bug, so hardware
detection is not possible. Tegra264 is device-tree-only (no ACPI/IORT
support) and already has a dedicated "nvidia,tegra264-smmu" compatible,
so DT-probe is the only viable detection path.
Enable the workaround on instances matching the existing
"nvidia,tegra264-smmu" compatible by calling static_branch_enable() on
arm_smmu_erratum_repeat_tlbi_cfgi_key. Document the erratum in
Documentation/arch/arm64/silicon-errata.rst.
The host repeats only the invalidations it issues itself. On a nesting
setup the guest submits its own invalidations, either directly through
VCMDQ or via the iommufd user-invalidation path, so the guest is the one
that has to apply the workaround there. Report the erratum to user space
through the new IOMMU_HW_INFO_ARM_SMMUV3_ERRATA_REPEAT_TLBI_CFGI hw_info
flag so a VMM can confirm the guest runs a matching "nvidia,tegra264-smmu"
(or otherwise double the commands itself). The host therefore does not
repeat the guest's user-issued invalidations, which would otherwise be
doubled a second time.
Signed-off-by: Ashish Mhetre <amhetre@nvidia.com>
---
Documentation/arch/arm64/silicon-errata.rst | 2 ++
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-iommufd.c | 3 +++
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 11 +++++++++--
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h | 1 +
include/uapi/linux/iommufd.h | 12 +++++++++++-
5 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/arch/arm64/silicon-errata.rst b/Documentation/arch/arm64/silicon-errata.rst
index b0c68b64f5ac..744591598dfc 100644
--- a/Documentation/arch/arm64/silicon-errata.rst
+++ b/Documentation/arch/arm64/silicon-errata.rst
@@ -312,6 +312,8 @@ stable kernels.
| | | T241-MPAM-4, | |
| | | T241-MPAM-6 | |
+----------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------------------+
+| NVIDIA | T264 SMMU | T264-SMMU-3 | N/A |
++----------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------------------+
+----------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------------------+
| Freescale/NXP | LS2080A/LS1043A | A-008585 | FSL_ERRATUM_A008585 |
+----------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------------------+
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-iommufd.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-iommufd.c
index 032d0c272f3f..25982bdbcbd9 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-iommufd.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-iommufd.c
@@ -33,6 +33,9 @@ void *arm_smmu_hw_info(struct device *dev, u32 *length,
info->iidr = readl_relaxed(master->smmu->base + ARM_SMMU_IIDR);
info->aidr = readl_relaxed(master->smmu->base + ARM_SMMU_AIDR);
+ if (arm_smmu_erratum_repeat_tlbi_cfgi())
+ info->flags |= IOMMU_HW_INFO_ARM_SMMUV3_ERRATA_REPEAT_TLBI_CFGI;
+
*length = sizeof(*info);
*type = IOMMU_HW_INFO_TYPE_ARM_SMMUV3;
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
index f0f8b2daf8d5..67e19c240ea5 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
@@ -829,11 +829,16 @@ int __arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
return ret;
}
+bool arm_smmu_erratum_repeat_tlbi_cfgi(void)
+{
+ return static_branch_unlikely(&arm_smmu_erratum_repeat_tlbi_cfgi_key);
+}
+
bool arm_smmu_erratum_cmd_needs_repeating(struct arm_smmu_cmd *cmd)
{
u8 opcode;
- if (!static_branch_unlikely(&arm_smmu_erratum_repeat_tlbi_cfgi_key))
+ if (!arm_smmu_erratum_repeat_tlbi_cfgi())
return false;
opcode = FIELD_GET(CMDQ_0_OP, cmd->data[0]);
@@ -5357,8 +5362,10 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_dt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
if (of_dma_is_coherent(dev->of_node))
smmu->features |= ARM_SMMU_FEAT_COHERENCY;
- if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "nvidia,tegra264-smmu"))
+ if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "nvidia,tegra264-smmu")) {
tegra_cmdqv_dt_probe(dev->of_node, smmu);
+ static_branch_enable(&arm_smmu_erratum_repeat_tlbi_cfgi_key);
+ }
return ret;
}
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
index 9508bf50d14c..6465c0357fb5 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
@@ -1216,6 +1216,7 @@ int arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
struct arm_smmu_cmd *cmds, int n,
bool sync);
bool arm_smmu_erratum_cmd_needs_repeating(struct arm_smmu_cmd *cmd);
+bool arm_smmu_erratum_repeat_tlbi_cfgi(void);
#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_SMMU_V3_SVA
bool arm_smmu_sva_supported(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu);
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/iommufd.h b/include/uapi/linux/iommufd.h
index fddaf14cfdd2..be23922b053a 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/iommufd.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/iommufd.h
@@ -602,11 +602,21 @@ struct iommu_hw_info_vtd {
__aligned_u64 ecap_reg;
};
+/**
+ * enum iommu_hw_info_arm_smmuv3_flags - Flags for ARM SMMUv3 hw_info
+ * @IOMMU_HW_INFO_ARM_SMMUV3_ERRATA_REPEAT_TLBI_CFGI: If set, user space must
+ * issue TLBI/CFGI+SYNC commands twice due to a hardware erratum T264-SMMU-3.
+ * See the description at arm_smmu_erratum_repeat_tlbi_cfgi_key.
+ */
+enum iommu_hw_info_arm_smmuv3_flags {
+ IOMMU_HW_INFO_ARM_SMMUV3_ERRATA_REPEAT_TLBI_CFGI = 1 << 0,
+};
+
/**
* struct iommu_hw_info_arm_smmuv3 - ARM SMMUv3 hardware information
* (IOMMU_HW_INFO_TYPE_ARM_SMMUV3)
*
- * @flags: Must be set to 0
+ * @flags: Combination of enum iommu_hw_info_arm_smmuv3_flags
* @__reserved: Must be 0
* @idr: Implemented features for ARM SMMU Non-secure programming interface
* @iidr: Information about the implementation and implementer of ARM SMMU,
--
2.50.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v8 2/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Introduce CFGI/TLBI-repeat workaround infrastructure
2026-07-22 10:20 ` [PATCH v8 2/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Introduce CFGI/TLBI-repeat workaround infrastructure Ashish Mhetre
@ 2026-07-22 19:02 ` Nicolin Chen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Nicolin Chen @ 2026-07-22 19:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ashish Mhetre
Cc: catalin.marinas, will, corbet, skhan, robin.murphy, joro, jgg,
linux-arm-kernel, linux-doc, linux-kernel, iommu, linux-tegra,
Jason Gunthorpe
On Wed, Jul 22, 2026 at 10:20:32AM +0000, Ashish Mhetre wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
> index c909c9a88538..9508bf50d14c 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
> @@ -1207,10 +1207,15 @@ void arm_smmu_attach_commit(struct arm_smmu_attach_state *state);
> int arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
> struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq,
> struct arm_smmu_cmd *cmds, int n,
> bool sync);
> +bool arm_smmu_erratum_cmd_needs_repeating(struct arm_smmu_cmd *cmd);
Is this needed?
Nicolin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v8 3/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Enable CFGI/TLBI-repeat workaround on Tegra264
2026-07-22 10:20 ` [PATCH v8 3/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Enable CFGI/TLBI-repeat workaround on Tegra264 Ashish Mhetre
@ 2026-07-22 19:16 ` Nicolin Chen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Nicolin Chen @ 2026-07-22 19:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ashish Mhetre
Cc: catalin.marinas, will, corbet, skhan, robin.murphy, joro, jgg,
linux-arm-kernel, linux-doc, linux-kernel, iommu, linux-tegra
On Wed, Jul 22, 2026 at 10:20:33AM +0000, Ashish Mhetre wrote:
> The host repeats only the invalidations it issues itself. On a nesting
> setup the guest submits its own invalidations, either directly through
> VCMDQ or via the iommufd user-invalidation path, so the guest is the one
> that has to apply the workaround there. Report the erratum to user space
> through the new IOMMU_HW_INFO_ARM_SMMUV3_ERRATA_REPEAT_TLBI_CFGI hw_info
> flag so a VMM can confirm the guest runs a matching "nvidia,tegra264-smmu"
> (or otherwise double the commands itself). The host therefore does not
> repeat the guest's user-issued invalidations, which would otherwise be
> doubled a second time.
I think this "enable" patch is doing a bit too much.
All the iommufd-related changes can be added separately
I would do a cleanup:
- arm-smmu-v3: Factor force_sync
- arm-smmu-v3: Add arm_smmu_erratum_repeat_tlbi_cfgi_key and WAR
- arm-smmu-v3-iommufd: Add IOMMU_HW_INFO_ARM_SMMUV3_ERRATA_REPEAT_TLBI_CFGI
- arm-smmu-v3: Set arm_smmu_erratum_repeat_tlbi_cfgi_key
> +/**
> + * enum iommu_hw_info_arm_smmuv3_flags - Flags for ARM SMMUv3 hw_info
> + * @IOMMU_HW_INFO_ARM_SMMUV3_ERRATA_REPEAT_TLBI_CFGI: If set, user space must
> + * issue TLBI/CFGI+SYNC commands twice due to a hardware erratum T264-SMMU-3.
> + * See the description at arm_smmu_erratum_repeat_tlbi_cfgi_key.
You can follow the kdoc style as enum iommufd_option.
Nicolin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-07-22 19:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-07-22 10:20 [PATCH v8 0/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Tegra264 invalidation workaround Ashish Mhetre
2026-07-22 10:20 ` [PATCH v8 1/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Factor out CMDQ batch force-sync conditions Ashish Mhetre
2026-07-22 10:20 ` [PATCH v8 2/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Introduce CFGI/TLBI-repeat workaround infrastructure Ashish Mhetre
2026-07-22 19:02 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-07-22 10:20 ` [PATCH v8 3/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Enable CFGI/TLBI-repeat workaround on Tegra264 Ashish Mhetre
2026-07-22 19:16 ` Nicolin Chen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox