Re: [PATCH] docs: remove Assisted-by reference

[Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>]

On Tue, Oct 13, 2026 at 04:18:32PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2026 at 02:55:59PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> 
> > The absence of the tag on a suspicious series offered a low-effort way
> > for maintainers to push back. What's the proposed low-effort replacement
> > ?
> 
> Greg's suggested asking "how did you test this?" or similar, a lot of
> people just throwing stuff at the wall simply won't respond.

I've done that too. I still find it better to have multiple tools at my
disposal, I want to be able to tell people they're expected to disclose
that the code they submit was generated.

Maybe Documentation/process/generated-content.rst is enough. As I wrote,
what matters to me is the disclosure requirement, not the Assisted-by
tag as such. I'm however concerned that it's even easier for
contributors to ignore Documentation/process/generated-content.rst than
the tag.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart