public inbox for linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
	Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>,
	"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>, <x86@kernel.org>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@quicinc.com>,
	Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	"Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)" <tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
	<patches@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 3/7] x86/resctrl: Refactor mbm_update()
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 15:08:27 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2ed76893-ac65-d9a2-aeea-c927ebd2a1e8@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241029172832.93963-4-tony.luck@intel.com>

Hi, Tony,

On 10/29/24 10:28, Tony Luck wrote:
> Computing memory bandwidth for all enabled events resulted in
> identical code blocks for total and local bandwidth in mbm_update().
> 
> Refactor with a helper function to eliminate code duplication.
> 
> No functional change.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> ---
>   arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c | 69 ++++++++++-----------------
>   1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
> index 3ef339e405c2..1b6cb3bbc008 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
> @@ -829,62 +829,41 @@ static void update_mba_bw(struct rdtgroup *rgrp, struct rdt_mon_domain *dom_mbm)
>   	resctrl_arch_update_one(r_mba, dom_mba, closid, CDP_NONE, new_msr_val);
>   }
>   
> -static void mbm_update(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_mon_domain *d,
> -		       u32 closid, u32 rmid)
> +static void mbm_update_one_event(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_mon_domain *d,
> +				 u32 closid, u32 rmid, enum resctrl_event_id evtid)
>   {
>   	struct rmid_read rr = {0};
>   
>   	rr.r = r;
>   	rr.d = d;
> +	rr.evtid = evtid;
> +	rr.arch_mon_ctx = resctrl_arch_mon_ctx_alloc(rr.r, rr.evtid);
> +	if (IS_ERR(rr.arch_mon_ctx)) {
> +		pr_warn_ratelimited("Failed to allocate monitor context: %ld",
> +				    PTR_ERR(rr.arch_mon_ctx));
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	__mon_event_count(closid, rmid, &rr);
> +

The comment (added in patch 2 and legacy code) is removed completely here.

Maybe it's better to remain the comment here?

> +	if (is_mba_sc(NULL))
> +		mbm_bw_count(closid, rmid, &rr);
> +
> +	resctrl_arch_mon_ctx_free(rr.r, rr.evtid, rr.arch_mon_ctx);
> +}
>   
> +static void mbm_update(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_mon_domain *d,
> +		       u32 closid, u32 rmid)
> +{
>   	/*
>   	 * This is protected from concurrent reads from user
>   	 * as both the user and we hold the global mutex.
>   	 */
> -	if (is_mbm_total_enabled()) {
> -		rr.evtid = QOS_L3_MBM_TOTAL_EVENT_ID;
> -		rr.val = 0;
> -		rr.arch_mon_ctx = resctrl_arch_mon_ctx_alloc(rr.r, rr.evtid);
> -		if (IS_ERR(rr.arch_mon_ctx)) {
> -			pr_warn_ratelimited("Failed to allocate monitor context: %ld",
> -					    PTR_ERR(rr.arch_mon_ctx));
> -			return;
> -		}
> -
> -		__mon_event_count(closid, rmid, &rr);
> -
> -		/*
> -		 * Call the MBA software controller only for the
> -		 * control groups and when user has enabled
> -		 * the software controller explicitly.
> -		 */

Same comment was added in patch 2 but is removed in the helper. Maybe 
it's better to add back the comment in the helper.

> -		if (is_mba_sc(NULL))
> -			mbm_bw_count(closid, rmid, &rr);
> -
> -		resctrl_arch_mon_ctx_free(rr.r, rr.evtid, rr.arch_mon_ctx);
> -	}
> -	if (is_mbm_local_enabled()) {
> -		rr.evtid = QOS_L3_MBM_LOCAL_EVENT_ID;
> -		rr.val = 0;
> -		rr.arch_mon_ctx = resctrl_arch_mon_ctx_alloc(rr.r, rr.evtid);
> -		if (IS_ERR(rr.arch_mon_ctx)) {
> -			pr_warn_ratelimited("Failed to allocate monitor context: %ld",
> -					    PTR_ERR(rr.arch_mon_ctx));
> -			return;
> -		}
> -
> -		__mon_event_count(closid, rmid, &rr);
> -
> -		/*
> -		 * Call the MBA software controller only for the
> -		 * control groups and when user has enabled
> -		 * the software controller explicitly.
> -		 */

This same comment is in legacy code and is removed in the helper.

> -		if (is_mba_sc(NULL))
> -			mbm_bw_count(closid, rmid, &rr);
> +	if (is_mbm_total_enabled())
> +		mbm_update_one_event(r, d, closid, rmid, QOS_L3_MBM_TOTAL_EVENT_ID);
>   
> -		resctrl_arch_mon_ctx_free(rr.r, rr.evtid, rr.arch_mon_ctx);
> -	}
> +	if (is_mbm_local_enabled())
> +		mbm_update_one_event(r, d, closid, rmid, QOS_L3_MBM_LOCAL_EVENT_ID);
>   }
>   
>   /*

Thanks.

-Fenghua

  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-01 22:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-29 17:28 [PATCH v8 0/7] x86/resctrl: mba_MBps enhancement Tony Luck
2024-10-29 17:28 ` [PATCH v8 1/7] x86/resctrl: Prepare for per-ctrl_mon group mba_MBps control Tony Luck
2024-11-01 22:03   ` Fenghua Yu
2024-11-01 22:40     ` Tony Luck
2024-11-12 19:24   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-10-29 17:28 ` [PATCH v8 2/7] x86/resctrl: Compute memory bandwidth for all supported events Tony Luck
2024-11-12 19:25   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-10-29 17:28 ` [PATCH v8 3/7] x86/resctrl: Refactor mbm_update() Tony Luck
2024-11-01 22:08   ` Fenghua Yu [this message]
2024-11-01 22:57     ` Tony Luck
2024-11-13 22:25   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-13 22:58     ` Tony Luck
2024-11-13 23:58       ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-14 10:31       ` Peter Newman
2024-11-14 17:20         ` Tony Luck
2024-10-29 17:28 ` [PATCH v8 4/7] x86/resctrl: Relax checks for mba_MBps mount option Tony Luck
2024-10-29 17:28 ` [PATCH v8 5/7] x86/resctrl: Add "mba_MBps_event" file to ctrl_mon directories Tony Luck
2024-11-12 22:12   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-12 23:42     ` Luck, Tony
2024-11-13  0:20       ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-13  0:53         ` Luck, Tony
2024-11-13  2:54           ` Reinette Chatre
2024-10-29 17:28 ` [PATCH v8 6/7] x86/resctrl: Add write option to "mba_MBps_event" file Tony Luck
2024-11-01 23:26   ` Fenghua Yu
2024-11-01 23:55     ` Luck, Tony
2024-11-02  0:57       ` Fenghua Yu
2024-11-12 22:00         ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-12 23:57           ` Luck, Tony
2024-11-13  0:40             ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-12 22:18   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-10-29 17:28 ` [PATCH v8 7/7] x86/resctrl: Document the new " Tony Luck
2024-11-12 22:25   ` Reinette Chatre

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2ed76893-ac65-d9a2-aeea-c927ebd2a1e8@intel.com \
    --to=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=peternewman@google.com \
    --cc=quic_jiles@quicinc.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox