From: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>,
"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>, <x86@kernel.org>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@quicinc.com>,
Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
"Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)" <tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
<patches@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 3/7] x86/resctrl: Refactor mbm_update()
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 15:08:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2ed76893-ac65-d9a2-aeea-c927ebd2a1e8@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241029172832.93963-4-tony.luck@intel.com>
Hi, Tony,
On 10/29/24 10:28, Tony Luck wrote:
> Computing memory bandwidth for all enabled events resulted in
> identical code blocks for total and local bandwidth in mbm_update().
>
> Refactor with a helper function to eliminate code duplication.
>
> No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c | 69 ++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
> index 3ef339e405c2..1b6cb3bbc008 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
> @@ -829,62 +829,41 @@ static void update_mba_bw(struct rdtgroup *rgrp, struct rdt_mon_domain *dom_mbm)
> resctrl_arch_update_one(r_mba, dom_mba, closid, CDP_NONE, new_msr_val);
> }
>
> -static void mbm_update(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_mon_domain *d,
> - u32 closid, u32 rmid)
> +static void mbm_update_one_event(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_mon_domain *d,
> + u32 closid, u32 rmid, enum resctrl_event_id evtid)
> {
> struct rmid_read rr = {0};
>
> rr.r = r;
> rr.d = d;
> + rr.evtid = evtid;
> + rr.arch_mon_ctx = resctrl_arch_mon_ctx_alloc(rr.r, rr.evtid);
> + if (IS_ERR(rr.arch_mon_ctx)) {
> + pr_warn_ratelimited("Failed to allocate monitor context: %ld",
> + PTR_ERR(rr.arch_mon_ctx));
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + __mon_event_count(closid, rmid, &rr);
> +
The comment (added in patch 2 and legacy code) is removed completely here.
Maybe it's better to remain the comment here?
> + if (is_mba_sc(NULL))
> + mbm_bw_count(closid, rmid, &rr);
> +
> + resctrl_arch_mon_ctx_free(rr.r, rr.evtid, rr.arch_mon_ctx);
> +}
>
> +static void mbm_update(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_mon_domain *d,
> + u32 closid, u32 rmid)
> +{
> /*
> * This is protected from concurrent reads from user
> * as both the user and we hold the global mutex.
> */
> - if (is_mbm_total_enabled()) {
> - rr.evtid = QOS_L3_MBM_TOTAL_EVENT_ID;
> - rr.val = 0;
> - rr.arch_mon_ctx = resctrl_arch_mon_ctx_alloc(rr.r, rr.evtid);
> - if (IS_ERR(rr.arch_mon_ctx)) {
> - pr_warn_ratelimited("Failed to allocate monitor context: %ld",
> - PTR_ERR(rr.arch_mon_ctx));
> - return;
> - }
> -
> - __mon_event_count(closid, rmid, &rr);
> -
> - /*
> - * Call the MBA software controller only for the
> - * control groups and when user has enabled
> - * the software controller explicitly.
> - */
Same comment was added in patch 2 but is removed in the helper. Maybe
it's better to add back the comment in the helper.
> - if (is_mba_sc(NULL))
> - mbm_bw_count(closid, rmid, &rr);
> -
> - resctrl_arch_mon_ctx_free(rr.r, rr.evtid, rr.arch_mon_ctx);
> - }
> - if (is_mbm_local_enabled()) {
> - rr.evtid = QOS_L3_MBM_LOCAL_EVENT_ID;
> - rr.val = 0;
> - rr.arch_mon_ctx = resctrl_arch_mon_ctx_alloc(rr.r, rr.evtid);
> - if (IS_ERR(rr.arch_mon_ctx)) {
> - pr_warn_ratelimited("Failed to allocate monitor context: %ld",
> - PTR_ERR(rr.arch_mon_ctx));
> - return;
> - }
> -
> - __mon_event_count(closid, rmid, &rr);
> -
> - /*
> - * Call the MBA software controller only for the
> - * control groups and when user has enabled
> - * the software controller explicitly.
> - */
This same comment is in legacy code and is removed in the helper.
> - if (is_mba_sc(NULL))
> - mbm_bw_count(closid, rmid, &rr);
> + if (is_mbm_total_enabled())
> + mbm_update_one_event(r, d, closid, rmid, QOS_L3_MBM_TOTAL_EVENT_ID);
>
> - resctrl_arch_mon_ctx_free(rr.r, rr.evtid, rr.arch_mon_ctx);
> - }
> + if (is_mbm_local_enabled())
> + mbm_update_one_event(r, d, closid, rmid, QOS_L3_MBM_LOCAL_EVENT_ID);
> }
>
> /*
Thanks.
-Fenghua
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-01 22:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-29 17:28 [PATCH v8 0/7] x86/resctrl: mba_MBps enhancement Tony Luck
2024-10-29 17:28 ` [PATCH v8 1/7] x86/resctrl: Prepare for per-ctrl_mon group mba_MBps control Tony Luck
2024-11-01 22:03 ` Fenghua Yu
2024-11-01 22:40 ` Tony Luck
2024-11-12 19:24 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-10-29 17:28 ` [PATCH v8 2/7] x86/resctrl: Compute memory bandwidth for all supported events Tony Luck
2024-11-12 19:25 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-10-29 17:28 ` [PATCH v8 3/7] x86/resctrl: Refactor mbm_update() Tony Luck
2024-11-01 22:08 ` Fenghua Yu [this message]
2024-11-01 22:57 ` Tony Luck
2024-11-13 22:25 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-13 22:58 ` Tony Luck
2024-11-13 23:58 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-14 10:31 ` Peter Newman
2024-11-14 17:20 ` Tony Luck
2024-10-29 17:28 ` [PATCH v8 4/7] x86/resctrl: Relax checks for mba_MBps mount option Tony Luck
2024-10-29 17:28 ` [PATCH v8 5/7] x86/resctrl: Add "mba_MBps_event" file to ctrl_mon directories Tony Luck
2024-11-12 22:12 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-12 23:42 ` Luck, Tony
2024-11-13 0:20 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-13 0:53 ` Luck, Tony
2024-11-13 2:54 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-10-29 17:28 ` [PATCH v8 6/7] x86/resctrl: Add write option to "mba_MBps_event" file Tony Luck
2024-11-01 23:26 ` Fenghua Yu
2024-11-01 23:55 ` Luck, Tony
2024-11-02 0:57 ` Fenghua Yu
2024-11-12 22:00 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-12 23:57 ` Luck, Tony
2024-11-13 0:40 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-12 22:18 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-10-29 17:28 ` [PATCH v8 7/7] x86/resctrl: Document the new " Tony Luck
2024-11-12 22:25 ` Reinette Chatre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2ed76893-ac65-d9a2-aeea-c927ebd2a1e8@intel.com \
--to=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=peternewman@google.com \
--cc=quic_jiles@quicinc.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox