public inbox for linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
To: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
	Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	x86@kernel.org, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@quicinc.com>,
	Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	"Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)" <tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	patches@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 3/7] x86/resctrl: Refactor mbm_update()
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 15:57:15 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZyVcy-7BkqO6Vcr6@agluck-desk3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2ed76893-ac65-d9a2-aeea-c927ebd2a1e8@intel.com>

On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 03:08:27PM -0700, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> > -		/*
> > -		 * Call the MBA software controller only for the
> > -		 * control groups and when user has enabled
> > -		 * the software controller explicitly.
> > -		 */
> 
> Same comment was added in patch 2 but is removed in the helper. Maybe it's
> better to add back the comment in the helper.
> 
> > -		if (is_mba_sc(NULL))
> > -			mbm_bw_count(closid, rmid, &rr);

In patch 2 I cut & pasted the comment along with the code from
the if (is_mbm_local()) {...}  clause into the if (is_mbm_total()) { ... }
clause. Maybe to make it more obvious that the code was duplicated.

But I had doubts about the usefulness/accuracy when making the
helper function.

Breaking the comment into pieces:

    "Call the MBA software controller"

This code isn't calling the "controller". To me that's the
update_mba_bw() function that adjusts the MBA values. The
call to mbm_bw_count() is simply computing the bandwidth.

    "only for the control groups"

while this is true, the test in the code here "if (is_mba_sc(NULL))"
isn't making any checks about control groups.

    "and when user has enabled the software controller"

Accurate.

    "explicitly"

Redundant (or confusing, there is no "implicit" way to enable
the s/w controller).


If a comment is needed (and I'm not convinced that it is)
maybe something like:

	/*
	 * If the software controller controller is enabled, compute the
	 * bandwidth for this event id.
	 */

-Tony

  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-01 22:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-29 17:28 [PATCH v8 0/7] x86/resctrl: mba_MBps enhancement Tony Luck
2024-10-29 17:28 ` [PATCH v8 1/7] x86/resctrl: Prepare for per-ctrl_mon group mba_MBps control Tony Luck
2024-11-01 22:03   ` Fenghua Yu
2024-11-01 22:40     ` Tony Luck
2024-11-12 19:24   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-10-29 17:28 ` [PATCH v8 2/7] x86/resctrl: Compute memory bandwidth for all supported events Tony Luck
2024-11-12 19:25   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-10-29 17:28 ` [PATCH v8 3/7] x86/resctrl: Refactor mbm_update() Tony Luck
2024-11-01 22:08   ` Fenghua Yu
2024-11-01 22:57     ` Tony Luck [this message]
2024-11-13 22:25   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-13 22:58     ` Tony Luck
2024-11-13 23:58       ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-14 10:31       ` Peter Newman
2024-11-14 17:20         ` Tony Luck
2024-10-29 17:28 ` [PATCH v8 4/7] x86/resctrl: Relax checks for mba_MBps mount option Tony Luck
2024-10-29 17:28 ` [PATCH v8 5/7] x86/resctrl: Add "mba_MBps_event" file to ctrl_mon directories Tony Luck
2024-11-12 22:12   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-12 23:42     ` Luck, Tony
2024-11-13  0:20       ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-13  0:53         ` Luck, Tony
2024-11-13  2:54           ` Reinette Chatre
2024-10-29 17:28 ` [PATCH v8 6/7] x86/resctrl: Add write option to "mba_MBps_event" file Tony Luck
2024-11-01 23:26   ` Fenghua Yu
2024-11-01 23:55     ` Luck, Tony
2024-11-02  0:57       ` Fenghua Yu
2024-11-12 22:00         ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-12 23:57           ` Luck, Tony
2024-11-13  0:40             ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-12 22:18   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-10-29 17:28 ` [PATCH v8 7/7] x86/resctrl: Document the new " Tony Luck
2024-11-12 22:25   ` Reinette Chatre

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZyVcy-7BkqO6Vcr6@agluck-desk3 \
    --to=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=peternewman@google.com \
    --cc=quic_jiles@quicinc.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox