From: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
To: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
x86@kernel.org, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@quicinc.com>,
Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
"Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)" <tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
patches@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 3/7] x86/resctrl: Refactor mbm_update()
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 15:57:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZyVcy-7BkqO6Vcr6@agluck-desk3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2ed76893-ac65-d9a2-aeea-c927ebd2a1e8@intel.com>
On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 03:08:27PM -0700, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> > - /*
> > - * Call the MBA software controller only for the
> > - * control groups and when user has enabled
> > - * the software controller explicitly.
> > - */
>
> Same comment was added in patch 2 but is removed in the helper. Maybe it's
> better to add back the comment in the helper.
>
> > - if (is_mba_sc(NULL))
> > - mbm_bw_count(closid, rmid, &rr);
In patch 2 I cut & pasted the comment along with the code from
the if (is_mbm_local()) {...} clause into the if (is_mbm_total()) { ... }
clause. Maybe to make it more obvious that the code was duplicated.
But I had doubts about the usefulness/accuracy when making the
helper function.
Breaking the comment into pieces:
"Call the MBA software controller"
This code isn't calling the "controller". To me that's the
update_mba_bw() function that adjusts the MBA values. The
call to mbm_bw_count() is simply computing the bandwidth.
"only for the control groups"
while this is true, the test in the code here "if (is_mba_sc(NULL))"
isn't making any checks about control groups.
"and when user has enabled the software controller"
Accurate.
"explicitly"
Redundant (or confusing, there is no "implicit" way to enable
the s/w controller).
If a comment is needed (and I'm not convinced that it is)
maybe something like:
/*
* If the software controller controller is enabled, compute the
* bandwidth for this event id.
*/
-Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-01 22:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-29 17:28 [PATCH v8 0/7] x86/resctrl: mba_MBps enhancement Tony Luck
2024-10-29 17:28 ` [PATCH v8 1/7] x86/resctrl: Prepare for per-ctrl_mon group mba_MBps control Tony Luck
2024-11-01 22:03 ` Fenghua Yu
2024-11-01 22:40 ` Tony Luck
2024-11-12 19:24 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-10-29 17:28 ` [PATCH v8 2/7] x86/resctrl: Compute memory bandwidth for all supported events Tony Luck
2024-11-12 19:25 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-10-29 17:28 ` [PATCH v8 3/7] x86/resctrl: Refactor mbm_update() Tony Luck
2024-11-01 22:08 ` Fenghua Yu
2024-11-01 22:57 ` Tony Luck [this message]
2024-11-13 22:25 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-13 22:58 ` Tony Luck
2024-11-13 23:58 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-14 10:31 ` Peter Newman
2024-11-14 17:20 ` Tony Luck
2024-10-29 17:28 ` [PATCH v8 4/7] x86/resctrl: Relax checks for mba_MBps mount option Tony Luck
2024-10-29 17:28 ` [PATCH v8 5/7] x86/resctrl: Add "mba_MBps_event" file to ctrl_mon directories Tony Luck
2024-11-12 22:12 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-12 23:42 ` Luck, Tony
2024-11-13 0:20 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-13 0:53 ` Luck, Tony
2024-11-13 2:54 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-10-29 17:28 ` [PATCH v8 6/7] x86/resctrl: Add write option to "mba_MBps_event" file Tony Luck
2024-11-01 23:26 ` Fenghua Yu
2024-11-01 23:55 ` Luck, Tony
2024-11-02 0:57 ` Fenghua Yu
2024-11-12 22:00 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-12 23:57 ` Luck, Tony
2024-11-13 0:40 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-12 22:18 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-10-29 17:28 ` [PATCH v8 7/7] x86/resctrl: Document the new " Tony Luck
2024-11-12 22:25 ` Reinette Chatre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZyVcy-7BkqO6Vcr6@agluck-desk3 \
--to=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=peternewman@google.com \
--cc=quic_jiles@quicinc.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox