答复: 答复: 答复: [外部邮件] Re: [PATCH] mm/mempool: use static key for boot-time debug enablement

["Li,Rongqing(ACG CCN)" <lirongqing@baidu.com>]

> On 5/28/26 14:59, Usama Arif wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 28/05/2026 11:50, Li,Rongqing(ACG CCN) wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> On 28/05/2026 04:00, Li,Rongqing(ACG CCN) wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I think 32 bit ARM doesnt?
> >>
> >> You are right, 32-bit ARM doesn't.
> >>
> >> However, the correct architectural approach should be fixing the boot
> >> sequence inside arch/arm/ to match arm64 , powerpc and m68k, rather
> >> than compromising core MM code with temporary boilerplate variables.
> >>
> >> I prefer to keep the mempool implementation clean. If ARM32 triggers
> >> the warning, the proper remedy is a follow-up patch to align its
> >> setup_arch() ordering.
> >>
> >> What do you think?
> >>
> >
> > I think it would be a prerequisite rather than a follow up patch
> > inorder to not break 32 bit arm. I will let ARM and slab maintainers decide
> on this.
> 
> Yeah we shouldn't just knowingly break it.
> But I kind of doubt the argument that crucial mempool allocations happen
> that early in the boot and we could miss errors in them? They are mostly
> storage drivers, AFAICS. So I don't think we need the debugging to be enabled
> early.
> 
After some grep in kernel，I agree with you. 
Using __setup should be perfectly fine for this mempool parameter.

Thanks 

[Li,Rongqing]