* Re: [RESEND PATCHv3 0/3] Update Stratix10 EDAC Bindings [not found] <1554388597-28019-1-git-send-email-thor.thayer@linux.intel.com> @ 2019-04-09 19:11 ` Thor Thayer 2019-04-09 20:13 ` Borislav Petkov 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Thor Thayer @ 2019-04-09 19:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: bp, dinguyen, robh+dt, mark.rutland Cc: mchehab, james.morse, devicetree, linux-edac, linux-kernel Hi Boris, On 4/4/19 9:36 AM, thor.thayer@linux.intel.com wrote: > From: Thor Thayer <thor.thayer@linux.intel.com> > > This patch series makes the Stratix10 EDAC Bindings > specific to the Stratix10 ARM64 architecture. > > Instead of using the Arria10 (ARM32) EDAC bindings for > Stratix10 (ARM64), create Stratix10 specific EDAC bindings > to capture architecture differences between ARM32 and ARM64. > This requires fixing the previous Stratix10 bindings. > Also add the peripheral bindings for the Stratix10. > > V2: Remove Stratix10 compatible check. > > V3: Remove patches not related to EDAC bindings so that > this patchset is targeted toward the bindings. > Improve the Stratix10 specific binding description by > adding in descriptions of ARM64 differences. > > Resend: Add Reviewed-by and Acked-by from bindings and > socfpga device tree maintainers. I'd like this to go > through the EDAC tree since future patches will have > a dependency on these bindings and device tree. > > Thor Thayer (3): > Documentation: dt: edac: Fix Stratix10 IRQ bindings > Documentation: dt: edac: Add Stratix10 Peripheral bindings > arm64: dts: stratix10: Use new Stratix10 EDAC bindings > > .../devicetree/bindings/edac/socfpga-eccmgr.txt | 135 +++++++++++++++++++-- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/altera/socfpga_stratix10.dtsi | 25 ++-- > 2 files changed, 138 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) > If possible, I'd like this series to go through the EDAC tree since future patches will follow this format. Regards, Thor ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [RESEND PATCHv3 0/3] Update Stratix10 EDAC Bindings 2019-04-09 19:11 ` [RESEND PATCHv3 0/3] Update Stratix10 EDAC Bindings Thor Thayer @ 2019-04-09 20:13 ` Borislav Petkov 2019-04-09 22:32 ` Thor Thayer 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Borislav Petkov @ 2019-04-09 20:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Thor Thayer Cc: dinguyen, robh+dt, mark.rutland, mchehab, james.morse, devicetree, linux-edac, linux-kernel On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 02:11:58PM -0500, Thor Thayer wrote: > If possible, I'd like this series to go through the EDAC tree since future > patches will follow this format. You know how that works - I need ACKs. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [RESEND PATCHv3 0/3] Update Stratix10 EDAC Bindings 2019-04-09 20:13 ` Borislav Petkov @ 2019-04-09 22:32 ` Thor Thayer 2019-04-10 19:04 ` Borislav Petkov 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Thor Thayer @ 2019-04-09 22:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Borislav Petkov Cc: dinguyen, robh+dt, mark.rutland, mchehab, james.morse, devicetree, linux-edac, linux-kernel Hi Boris, On 4/9/19 3:13 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 02:11:58PM -0500, Thor Thayer wrote: >> If possible, I'd like this series to go through the EDAC tree since future >> patches will follow this format. > > You know how that works - I need ACKs. > I have ACKs on patches 1 & 3. Patch 2 has a Reviewed-by from Rob Herring which was sufficient in the past. Here are the links to the original ACKs and Reviewed-by. Patch 1: https://patchwork.codeaurora.org/patch/737155/ Patch 2: https://patchwork.codeaurora.org/patch/757205/ Patch 3: https://patchwork.codeaurora.org/patch/757207/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [RESEND PATCHv3 0/3] Update Stratix10 EDAC Bindings 2019-04-09 22:32 ` Thor Thayer @ 2019-04-10 19:04 ` Borislav Petkov 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Borislav Petkov @ 2019-04-10 19:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Thor Thayer Cc: dinguyen, robh+dt, mark.rutland, mchehab, james.morse, devicetree, linux-edac, linux-kernel On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 05:32:07PM -0500, Thor Thayer wrote: > I have ACKs on patches 1 & 3. Patch 2 has a Reviewed-by from Rob Herring > which was sufficient in the past. Sorry about that - I missed those because I looked only at the diffstat and decided this series is not for me :) Anyway, all three applied now. Thx. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-04-10 19:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <1554388597-28019-1-git-send-email-thor.thayer@linux.intel.com>
2019-04-09 19:11 ` [RESEND PATCHv3 0/3] Update Stratix10 EDAC Bindings Thor Thayer
2019-04-09 20:13 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-04-09 22:32 ` Thor Thayer
2019-04-10 19:04 ` Borislav Petkov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox