From: Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@huawei.com>
To: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
Cc: "linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org" <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>,
"dan.j.williams@intel.com" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>,
"dave.jiang@intel.com" <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
"dave@stgolabs.net" <dave@stgolabs.net>,
"vishal.l.verma@intel.com" <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
"ira.weiny@intel.com" <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
"linux-edac@vger.kernel.org" <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
"bp@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>,
"tony.luck@intel.com" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
"lenb@kernel.org" <lenb@kernel.org>,
"Yazen.Ghannam@amd.com" <Yazen.Ghannam@amd.com>,
"mchehab@kernel.org" <mchehab@kernel.org>,
"nifan.cxl@gmail.com" <nifan.cxl@gmail.com>,
Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
tanxiaofei <tanxiaofei@huawei.com>,
"Zengtao (B)" <prime.zeng@hisilicon.com>,
Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>,
"kangkang.shen@futurewei.com" <kangkang.shen@futurewei.com>,
wanghuiqiang <wanghuiqiang@huawei.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 3/8] cxl/edac: Add CXL memory device patrol scrub control feature
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 23:44:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3def6e579ab4439fb933ee742b3d9752@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aCviqcNwQCUokZhl@aschofie-mobl2.lan>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
>Sent: 20 May 2025 03:02
>To: Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@huawei.com>
>Cc: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org; dan.j.williams@intel.com; Jonathan Cameron
><jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>; dave.jiang@intel.com; dave@stgolabs.net;
>vishal.l.verma@intel.com; ira.weiny@intel.com; linux-edac@vger.kernel.org;
>linux-doc@vger.kernel.org; bp@alien8.de; tony.luck@intel.com;
>lenb@kernel.org; Yazen.Ghannam@amd.com; mchehab@kernel.org;
>nifan.cxl@gmail.com; Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>; tanxiaofei
><tanxiaofei@huawei.com>; Zengtao (B) <prime.zeng@hisilicon.com>; Roberto
>Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>; kangkang.shen@futurewei.com;
>wanghuiqiang <wanghuiqiang@huawei.com>
>Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/8] cxl/edac: Add CXL memory device patrol scrub
>control feature
>
>On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 12:59:19PM +0100, shiju.jose@huawei.com wrote:
>> From: Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@huawei.com>
>>
>> CXL spec 3.2 section 8.2.10.9.11.1 describes the device patrol scrub
>> control feature. The device patrol scrub proactively locates and makes
>> corrections to errors in regular cycle.
>>
>
>snip
>
>> +
>> +static int cxl_scrub_get_attrbs(struct cxl_patrol_scrub_context *cxl_ps_ctx,
>> + u8 *cap, u16 *cycle, u8 *flags, u8 *min_cycle) {
>> + struct cxl_mailbox *cxl_mbox;
>> + u8 min_scrub_cycle = U8_MAX;
>> + struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd;
>> + int i, ret;
>> +
>> + if (cxl_ps_ctx->cxlr) {
>> + struct cxl_region *cxlr = cxl_ps_ctx->cxlr;
>> + struct cxl_region_params *p = &cxlr->params;
>
>This function and the next, have a big if { } wrapper around cxlr existence. Can
>this logic be reversed -
>
>ie, declare cxl_region and cxl_region_params in the header and then do
>something like -
>
> if (!cxl_ps_ctx->cxlr) {
> cxl_mbox = &cxl_ps_ctx->cxlmd->cxlds->cxl_mbox;
> return cxl_mem_scrub_get_attrbs(cxl_mbox, cap, cycle, flags,
>min_cycle);
> }
>
> cxlr = cxl_ps_ctx->cxlr;
> p = &cxlr->params;
>
>Then all this code below can shift left.
Changed.
>
>> +
>> + struct rw_semaphore *region_lock
>__free(rwsem_read_release) =
>> + rwsem_read_intr_acquire(&cxl_region_rwsem);
>> + if (!region_lock)
>> + return -EINTR;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < p->nr_targets; i++) {
>> + struct cxl_endpoint_decoder *cxled = p->targets[i];
>> +
>> + cxlmd = cxled_to_memdev(cxled);
>> + cxl_mbox = &cxlmd->cxlds->cxl_mbox;
>> + ret = cxl_mem_scrub_get_attrbs(cxl_mbox, cap, cycle,
>> + flags, min_cycle);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + if (min_cycle)
>> + min_scrub_cycle =
>> + min(*min_cycle, min_scrub_cycle);
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (min_cycle)
>> + *min_cycle = min_scrub_cycle;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> + cxl_mbox = &cxl_ps_ctx->cxlmd->cxlds->cxl_mbox;
>> +
>> + return cxl_mem_scrub_get_attrbs(cxl_mbox, cap, cycle, flags,
>> +min_cycle); }
>> +
>> +static int cxl_scrub_set_attrbs(struct device *dev,
>> + struct cxl_patrol_scrub_context *cxl_ps_ctx,
>> + u8 cycle, u8 flags)
>> +{
>> + struct cxl_scrub_wr_attrbs wr_attrbs;
>> + struct cxl_mailbox *cxl_mbox;
>> + struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd;
>> + int ret, i;
>> +
>> + wr_attrbs.scrub_cycle_hours = cycle;
>> + wr_attrbs.scrub_flags = flags;
>> +
>> + if (cxl_ps_ctx->cxlr) {
>> + struct cxl_region *cxlr = cxl_ps_ctx->cxlr;
>> + struct cxl_region_params *p = &cxlr->params;
>
>Similar to above function, but more work in the !cxlr case. Maybe a goto.
Modified with helper functions.
>
>
>> +
>> + struct rw_semaphore *region_lock
>__free(rwsem_read_release) =
>> + rwsem_read_intr_acquire(&cxl_region_rwsem);
>> + if (!region_lock)
>> + return -EINTR;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < p->nr_targets; i++) {
>> + struct cxl_endpoint_decoder *cxled = p->targets[i];
>> +
>> + cxlmd = cxled_to_memdev(cxled);
>> + cxl_mbox = &cxlmd->cxlds->cxl_mbox;
>> + ret = cxl_set_feature(cxl_mbox,
>&CXL_FEAT_PATROL_SCRUB_UUID,
>> + cxl_ps_ctx->set_version,
>&wr_attrbs,
>> + sizeof(wr_attrbs),
>> +
>CXL_SET_FEAT_FLAG_DATA_SAVED_ACROSS_RESET,
>> + 0, NULL);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + if (cycle != cxlmd->cur_scrub_cycle) {
>> + if (cxlmd->cur_region_id != -1)
>> + dev_info(dev,
>> + "Device scrub rate(%d hours)
>set by region%d rate overwritten by region%d scrub rate(%d hours)\n",
>> + cxlmd->cur_scrub_cycle,
>> + cxlmd->cur_region_id, cxlr->id,
>> + cycle);
>> +
>> + cxlmd->cur_scrub_cycle = cycle;
>> + cxlmd->cur_region_id = cxlr->id;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> +
>> + cxlmd = cxl_ps_ctx->cxlmd;
>> + cxl_mbox = &cxlmd->cxlds->cxl_mbox;
>> + ret = cxl_set_feature(cxl_mbox, &CXL_FEAT_PATROL_SCRUB_UUID,
>> + cxl_ps_ctx->set_version, &wr_attrbs,
>> + sizeof(wr_attrbs),
>> + CXL_SET_FEAT_FLAG_DATA_SAVED_ACROSS_RESET,
>0,
>> + NULL);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + if (cycle != cxlmd->cur_scrub_cycle) {
>> + if (cxlmd->cur_region_id != -1)
>> + dev_info(dev,
>> + "Device scrub rate(%d hours) set by region%d
>rate overwritten with device local scrub rate(%d hours)\n",
>> + cxlmd->cur_scrub_cycle, cxlmd-
>>cur_region_id,
>> + cycle);
>> +
>> + cxlmd->cur_scrub_cycle = cycle;
>> + cxlmd->cur_region_id = -1;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>
>skip
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h b/drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h index
>> 3ec6b906371b..685957b312ea 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h
>> +++ b/drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h
>> @@ -45,6 +45,8 @@
>> * @endpoint: connection to the CXL port topology for this memory device
>> * @id: id number of this memdev instance.
>> * @depth: endpoint port depth
>> + * @cur_scrub_cycle: current scrub cycle set for this device
>> + * @cur_region_id: id number of a backed region (if any) for which
>> + current scrub cycle set
>> */
>> struct cxl_memdev {
>> struct device dev;
>> @@ -56,6 +58,10 @@ struct cxl_memdev {
>> struct cxl_port *endpoint;
>> int id;
>> int depth;
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_CXL_EDAC_SCRUB
>> + u8 cur_scrub_cycle;
>> + int cur_region_id;
>> +#endif
>> };
>
>
>Why the cur_ prefix? Seems like it's just 'the' scrub cycle.
>
>How about:
>
>s/cur_scrub_cycle/scrub_cycle
>s/cur_region_id/scrub_region_id
>
>That also makes it clear that the region_id is related to the scrub.
Changed.
>
>Somewhere later cur_region_id gets compared to -1 a few times.
>Perhaps add a define for that like #define CXL_SCRUB_NO_REGION -1
Added and used CXL_SCRUB_NO_REGION.
>
>>
>> static inline struct cxl_memdev *to_cxl_memdev(struct device *dev) @@
>> -853,6 +859,16 @@ int cxl_trigger_poison_list(struct cxl_memdev
>> *cxlmd); int cxl_inject_poison(struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd, u64 dpa);
>> int cxl_clear_poison(struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd, u64 dpa);
>>
>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CXL_EDAC_MEM_FEATURES)
>
>that's the one I mentioned in cover letter that can be #ifdef
>
>> +int devm_cxl_memdev_edac_register(struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd); int
>> +devm_cxl_region_edac_register(struct cxl_region *cxlr); #else static
>> +inline int devm_cxl_memdev_edac_register(struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd) {
>> +return 0; } static inline int devm_cxl_region_edac_register(struct
>> +cxl_region *cxlr) { return 0; } #endif
>> +
>> #ifdef CONFIG_CXL_SUSPEND
>> void cxl_mem_active_inc(void);
>> void cxl_mem_active_dec(void);
>> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/mem.c b/drivers/cxl/mem.c index
>> 9675243bd05b..6e6777b7bafb 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cxl/mem.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cxl/mem.c
>> @@ -180,6 +180,10 @@ static int cxl_mem_probe(struct device *dev)
>> return rc;
>> }
>>
>> + rc = devm_cxl_memdev_edac_register(cxlmd);
>> + if (rc)
>> + dev_dbg(dev, "CXL memdev EDAC registration failed rc=%d\n",
>rc);
>> +
>> /*
>> * The kernel may be operating out of CXL memory on this device,
>> * there is no spec defined way to determine whether this device
>> --
>> 2.43.0
>>
>>
Thanks,
Shiju
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-20 23:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-15 11:59 [PATCH v5 0/8] cxl: support CXL memory RAS features shiju.jose
2025-05-15 11:59 ` [PATCH v5 1/8] EDAC: Update documentation for the CXL memory patrol scrub control feature shiju.jose
2025-05-15 17:18 ` Randy Dunlap
2025-05-15 11:59 ` [PATCH v5 2/8] cxl: Update prototype of function get_support_feature_info() shiju.jose
2025-05-15 11:59 ` [PATCH v5 3/8] cxl/edac: Add CXL memory device patrol scrub control feature shiju.jose
2025-05-20 2:02 ` Alison Schofield
2025-05-20 10:21 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-05-20 23:44 ` Shiju Jose [this message]
2025-05-15 11:59 ` [PATCH v5 4/8] cxl/edac: Add CXL memory device ECS " shiju.jose
2025-05-15 11:59 ` [PATCH v5 5/8] cxl/edac: Add support for PERFORM_MAINTENANCE command shiju.jose
2025-05-15 11:59 ` [PATCH v5 6/8] cxl/edac: Support for finding memory operation attributes from the current boot shiju.jose
2025-05-20 4:31 ` Alison Schofield
2025-05-20 23:45 ` Shiju Jose
2025-05-15 11:59 ` [PATCH v5 7/8] cxl/edac: Add CXL memory device memory sparing control feature shiju.jose
2025-05-19 21:01 ` Alison Schofield
2025-05-19 21:15 ` Dave Jiang
2025-05-19 21:34 ` Shiju Jose
2025-05-15 11:59 ` [PATCH v5 8/8] cxl/edac: Add CXL memory device soft PPR " shiju.jose
2025-05-15 17:23 ` Randy Dunlap
2025-05-20 1:36 ` [PATCH v5 0/8] cxl: support CXL memory RAS features Alison Schofield
2025-05-20 23:44 ` Shiju Jose
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3def6e579ab4439fb933ee742b3d9752@huawei.com \
--to=shiju.jose@huawei.com \
--cc=Yazen.Ghannam@amd.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=kangkang.shen@futurewei.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=nifan.cxl@gmail.com \
--cc=prime.zeng@hisilicon.com \
--cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
--cc=tanxiaofei@huawei.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
--cc=wanghuiqiang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox