From: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>
To: Rounak Das <rounakdas2025@gmail.com>
Cc: bp@alien8.de, tony.luck@intel.com, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] EDAC/altera: use SDMMC compatibles to select A10/S10 IRQ layout
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 09:44:58 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <470f54e9-9e92-40c1-9383-6be055170d69@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260616081709.48774-1-rounakdas2025@gmail.com>
Hi Rounak,
Thanks you for this patch and attempting to clean this up.
On 6/16/26 17:17, Rounak Das wrote:
> The SDMMC ECC IRQ layout selection uses CONFIG_64BIT to distinguish
> between Arria10 and Stratix10 paths. This is architecture-based,
> while the interrupt layout is a hardware property described by DT
> compatible strings.
>
> Select the SDMMC IRQ layout via of_device_is_compatible() checks
> for altr,socfpga-s10-sdmmc-ecc in both altr_portb_setup() and
> altr_edac_a10_device_add().
>
> This keeps the existing behavior for both SoCs while making the
> selection mechanism hardware-descriptive.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rounak Das <rounakdas2025@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/edac/altera_edac.c | 105 +++++++++++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/edac/altera_edac.c b/drivers/edac/altera_edac.c
> index 4edd2088c2db6..161331ef57c01 100644
> --- a/drivers/edac/altera_edac.c
> +++ b/drivers/edac/altera_edac.c
> @@ -1548,15 +1548,16 @@ static int altr_portb_setup(struct altr_edac_device_dev *device)
>
> /*
> * Update the PortB IRQs - A10 has 4, S10 has 2, Index accordingly
> - *
> - * FIXME: Instead of ifdefs with different architectures the driver
> - * should properly use compatibles.
> */
> -#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> - altdev->sb_irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, 1);
> -#else
> - altdev->sb_irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, 2);
> -#endif
> +
> + /* Using compatibles to determine the IRQ Index */
> + bool is_s10_sdmmc = of_device_is_compatible(np, "altr,socfpga-s10-sdmmc-ecc");
How come you've decided to look at the sdmmc-ecc compatible instead of
"altr,socfpga-s10-ecc-manager"?
> +
> + if (is_s10_sdmmc)
> + altdev->sb_irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, 1);
> + else
> + altdev->sb_irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, 2);
> +
> if (!altdev->sb_irq) {
> edac_printk(KERN_ERR, EDAC_DEVICE, "Error PortB SBIRQ alloc\n");
> rc = -ENODEV;
> @@ -1570,29 +1571,29 @@ static int altr_portb_setup(struct altr_edac_device_dev *device)
> goto err_release_group_1;
> }
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> - /* Use IRQ to determine SError origin instead of assigning IRQ */
> - rc = of_property_read_u32_index(np, "interrupts", 1, &altdev->db_irq);
> - if (rc) {
> - edac_printk(KERN_ERR, EDAC_DEVICE,
> - "Error PortB DBIRQ alloc\n");
> - goto err_release_group_1;
> - }
> -#else
> - altdev->db_irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, 3);
> - if (!altdev->db_irq) {
> - edac_printk(KERN_ERR, EDAC_DEVICE, "Error PortB DBIRQ alloc\n");
> - rc = -ENODEV;
> - goto err_release_group_1;
> - }
> - rc = devm_request_irq(&altdev->ddev, altdev->db_irq,
> - prv->ecc_irq_handler, IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH,
> - ecc_name, altdev);
> - if (rc) {
> - edac_printk(KERN_ERR, EDAC_DEVICE, "PortB DBERR IRQ error\n");
> - goto err_release_group_1;
> + if (is_s10_sdmmc) {
> + /* Use IRQ to determine SError origin instead of assigning IRQ */
> + rc = of_property_read_u32_index(np, "interrupts", 1, &altdev->db_irq);
> + if (rc) {
> + edac_printk(KERN_ERR, EDAC_DEVICE,
> + "Error PortB DBIRQ alloc\n");
> + goto err_release_group_1;
> + }
> + } else {
> + altdev->db_irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, 3);
> + if (!altdev->db_irq) {
> + edac_printk(KERN_ERR, EDAC_DEVICE, "Error PortB DBIRQ alloc\n");
> + rc = -ENODEV;
> + goto err_release_group_1;
> + }
> + rc = devm_request_irq(&altdev->ddev, altdev->db_irq,
> + prv->ecc_irq_handler, IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH,
> + ecc_name, altdev);
> + if (rc) {
> + edac_printk(KERN_ERR, EDAC_DEVICE, "PortB DBERR IRQ error\n");
> + goto err_release_group_1;
> + }
> }
> -#endif
>
> rc = edac_device_add_device(dci);
> if (rc) {
> @@ -1974,29 +1975,29 @@ static int altr_edac_a10_device_add(struct altr_arria10_edac *edac,
> goto err_release_group1;
> }
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> - /* Use IRQ to determine SError origin instead of assigning IRQ */
> - rc = of_property_read_u32_index(np, "interrupts", 0, &altdev->db_irq);
> - if (rc) {
> - edac_printk(KERN_ERR, EDAC_DEVICE,
> - "Unable to parse DB IRQ index\n");
> - goto err_release_group1;
> - }
> -#else
> - altdev->db_irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, 1);
> - if (!altdev->db_irq) {
> - edac_printk(KERN_ERR, EDAC_DEVICE, "Error allocating DBIRQ\n");
> - rc = -ENODEV;
> - goto err_release_group1;
> - }
> - rc = devm_request_irq(edac->dev, altdev->db_irq, prv->ecc_irq_handler,
> - IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH,
> - ecc_name, altdev);
> - if (rc) {
> - edac_printk(KERN_ERR, EDAC_DEVICE, "No DBERR IRQ resource\n");
> - goto err_release_group1;
> + if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "altr,socfpga-s10-sdmmc-ecc")) {
I'd like to avoid adding more calls to get compatible in the code if
possible.
> + /* Use IRQ to determine SError origin instead of assigning IRQ */
> + rc = of_property_read_u32_index(np, "interrupts", 0, &altdev->db_irq);
> + if (rc) {
> + edac_printk(KERN_ERR, EDAC_DEVICE,
> + "Unable to parse DB IRQ index\n");
> + goto err_release_group1;
> + }
> + } else {
> + altdev->db_irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, 1);
> + if (!altdev->db_irq) {
> + edac_printk(KERN_ERR, EDAC_DEVICE, "Error allocating DBIRQ\n");
> + rc = -ENODEV;
> + goto err_release_group1;
> + }
> + rc = devm_request_irq(edac->dev, altdev->db_irq, prv->ecc_irq_handler,
> + IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH,
> + ecc_name, altdev);
> + if (rc) {
> + edac_printk(KERN_ERR, EDAC_DEVICE, "No DBERR IRQ resource\n");
> + goto err_release_group1;
> + }
> }
> -#endif
>
> rc = edac_device_add_device(dci);
> if (rc) {
Got a few checkpatch warnings:
CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
#84: FILE: drivers/edac/altera_edac.c:1579:
+ edac_printk(KERN_ERR, EDAC_DEVICE,
+ "Error PortB DBIRQ alloc\n");
CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
#95: FILE: drivers/edac/altera_edac.c:1590:
+ rc = devm_request_irq(&altdev->ddev, altdev->db_irq,
+ prv->ecc_irq_handler, IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH,
CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
#136: FILE: drivers/edac/altera_edac.c:1983:
+ edac_printk(KERN_ERR, EDAC_DEVICE,
+ "Unable to parse DB IRQ index\n");
CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
#147: FILE: drivers/edac/altera_edac.c:1994:
+ rc = devm_request_irq(edac->dev, altdev->db_irq, prv->ecc_irq_handler,
+ IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH,
Thanks,
Dinh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-16 14:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-15 19:15 [PATCH] EDAC/altera: use SDMMC compatibles to select A10/S10 IRQ layout AZ9tumas
2026-06-15 20:27 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-06-16 8:17 ` [PATCH v2] " Rounak Das
2026-06-16 14:44 ` Dinh Nguyen [this message]
[not found] ` <3131206B-1E30-4EED-A327-D6FD39E6C4E8@gmail.com>
2026-06-16 23:58 ` Rounak Das
2026-06-24 14:55 ` Dinh Nguyen
2026-06-17 0:07 ` [PATCH v3] EDAC/altera: use ECC manager compatible " Rounak Das
2026-06-18 10:37 ` Dinh Nguyen
2026-06-18 13:26 ` Rounak Das
2026-06-25 12:09 ` Dinh Nguyen
2026-06-26 8:22 ` Rounak Das
2026-06-26 13:42 ` Dinh Nguyen
[not found] ` <4a6cf8c0-e425-4381-adf3-daaa1b20ba96@kernel.org>
2026-06-24 14:18 ` [PATCH v2] EDAC/altera: use SDMMC compatibles " Rounak Das
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=470f54e9-9e92-40c1-9383-6be055170d69@kernel.org \
--to=dinguyen@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rounakdas2025@gmail.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox