From: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>
To: Rounak Das <rounakdas2025@gmail.com>
Cc: bp@alien8.de, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] EDAC/altera: use ECC manager compatible to select A10/S10 IRQ layout
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2026 07:09:07 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <72efba41-f8b2-4cd2-9ce6-824cfc1a9d2c@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260617000711.60804-1-rounakdas2025@gmail.com>
On 6/16/26 19:07, Rounak Das wrote:
> The SDMMC ECC IRQ layout selection uses CONFIG_64BIT to distinguish
> between Arria10 and Stratix10 paths. This is architecture-based,
> while the interrupt layout is a hardware property described by DT
> compatible strings.
>
> Detect the SoC once at probe via the altr,socfpga-s10-ecc-manager
> compatible on the ECC manager node, store it under the struct
> altr_arria10_edac, and use it in altr_portb_setup() and
> altr_edac_a10_device_add() in place of CONFIG_64BIT.
>
> Selecting on the manager compatible keeps the decision SoC-wide and
> correct for every ECC child device (OCRAM, USB, EMAC, SD/MMC),
> and avoids repeated compatible lookups. Stratix10 and
> Agilex both declare altr,socfpga-s10-ecc-manager and Arria10 does not,
> so behaviour is unchanged on all three SoCs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rounak Das <rounakdas2025@gmail.com>
> ---
> v3:
> - Use compatible string altr,socfpga-s10-ecc-manager instead of
> sdmmc-ecc (Dinh).
> - Set it once into struct altr_arria10_edac::is_s10 to
> avoid repeated of_device_is_compatible() calls (Dinh).
> - Fix the checkpatch open-parenthesis alignment.
>
> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-edac/20260616081709.48774-1-rounakdas2025@gmail.com/
> - Use legal name in Signed-off-by (Borislav).
>
> drivers/edac/altera_edac.c | 106 +++++++++++++++++++------------------
> drivers/edac/altera_edac.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/edac/altera_edac.c b/drivers/edac/altera_edac.c
> index 4edd2088c2db6..c728cd474abdf 100644
> --- a/drivers/edac/altera_edac.c
> +++ b/drivers/edac/altera_edac.c
> @@ -1507,6 +1507,7 @@ static int altr_portb_setup(struct altr_edac_device_dev *device)
> int edac_idx, rc;
> struct device_node *np;
> const struct edac_device_prv_data *prv = &a10_sdmmceccb_data;
> + bool is_s10 = device->edac->is_s10;
>
> rc = altr_check_ecc_deps(device);
> if (rc)
> @@ -1548,15 +1549,14 @@ static int altr_portb_setup(struct altr_edac_device_dev *device)
>
> /*
> * Update the PortB IRQs - A10 has 4, S10 has 2, Index accordingly
> - *
> - * FIXME: Instead of ifdefs with different architectures the driver
> - * should properly use compatibles.
> */
> -#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> - altdev->sb_irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, 1);
> -#else
> - altdev->sb_irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, 2);
> -#endif
> +
> + /* Using compatibles to determine the IRQ Index */
> + if (is_s10)
> + altdev->sb_irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, 1);
> + else
> + altdev->sb_irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, 2);
> +
> if (!altdev->sb_irq) {
> edac_printk(KERN_ERR, EDAC_DEVICE, "Error PortB SBIRQ alloc\n");
> rc = -ENODEV;
> @@ -1570,29 +1570,28 @@ static int altr_portb_setup(struct altr_edac_device_dev *device)
> goto err_release_group_1;
> }
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> - /* Use IRQ to determine SError origin instead of assigning IRQ */
> - rc = of_property_read_u32_index(np, "interrupts", 1, &altdev->db_irq);
> - if (rc) {
> - edac_printk(KERN_ERR, EDAC_DEVICE,
> - "Error PortB DBIRQ alloc\n");
> - goto err_release_group_1;
> - }
> -#else
> - altdev->db_irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, 3);
> - if (!altdev->db_irq) {
> - edac_printk(KERN_ERR, EDAC_DEVICE, "Error PortB DBIRQ alloc\n");
> - rc = -ENODEV;
> - goto err_release_group_1;
> - }
> - rc = devm_request_irq(&altdev->ddev, altdev->db_irq,
> - prv->ecc_irq_handler, IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH,
> - ecc_name, altdev);
> - if (rc) {
> - edac_printk(KERN_ERR, EDAC_DEVICE, "PortB DBERR IRQ error\n");
> - goto err_release_group_1;
> + if (is_s10) {
> + /* Use IRQ to determine SError origin instead of assigning IRQ */
> + rc = of_property_read_u32_index(np, "interrupts", 1, &altdev->db_irq);
> + if (rc) {
> + edac_printk(KERN_ERR, EDAC_DEVICE, "Error PortB DBIRQ alloc\n");
> + goto err_release_group_1;
> + }
> + } else {
> + altdev->db_irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, 3);
> + if (!altdev->db_irq) {
> + edac_printk(KERN_ERR, EDAC_DEVICE, "Error PortB DBIRQ alloc\n");
> + rc = -ENODEV;
> + goto err_release_group_1;
> + }
> + rc = devm_request_irq(&altdev->ddev, altdev->db_irq,
> + prv->ecc_irq_handler, IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH,
> + ecc_name, altdev);
> + if (rc) {
> + edac_printk(KERN_ERR, EDAC_DEVICE, "PortB DBERR IRQ error\n");
> + goto err_release_group_1;
> + }
> }
> -#endif
>
> rc = edac_device_add_device(dci);
> if (rc) {
> @@ -1974,29 +1973,29 @@ static int altr_edac_a10_device_add(struct altr_arria10_edac *edac,
> goto err_release_group1;
> }
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> - /* Use IRQ to determine SError origin instead of assigning IRQ */
> - rc = of_property_read_u32_index(np, "interrupts", 0, &altdev->db_irq);
> - if (rc) {
> - edac_printk(KERN_ERR, EDAC_DEVICE,
> - "Unable to parse DB IRQ index\n");
> - goto err_release_group1;
> - }
> -#else
> - altdev->db_irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, 1);
> - if (!altdev->db_irq) {
> - edac_printk(KERN_ERR, EDAC_DEVICE, "Error allocating DBIRQ\n");
> - rc = -ENODEV;
> - goto err_release_group1;
> - }
> - rc = devm_request_irq(edac->dev, altdev->db_irq, prv->ecc_irq_handler,
> - IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH,
> - ecc_name, altdev);
> - if (rc) {
> - edac_printk(KERN_ERR, EDAC_DEVICE, "No DBERR IRQ resource\n");
> - goto err_release_group1;
> + if (edac->is_s10) {
> + /* Use IRQ to determine SError origin instead of assigning IRQ */
> + rc = of_property_read_u32_index(np, "interrupts", 0, &altdev->db_irq);
> + if (rc) {
> + edac_printk(KERN_ERR, EDAC_DEVICE,
> + "Unable to parse DB IRQ index\n");
> + goto err_release_group1;
> + }
> + } else {
> + altdev->db_irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, 1);
> + if (!altdev->db_irq) {
> + edac_printk(KERN_ERR, EDAC_DEVICE, "Error allocating DBIRQ\n");
> + rc = -ENODEV;
> + goto err_release_group1;
> + }
> + rc = devm_request_irq(edac->dev, altdev->db_irq, prv->ecc_irq_handler,
> + IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH,
> + ecc_name, altdev);
> + if (rc) {
> + edac_printk(KERN_ERR, EDAC_DEVICE, "No DBERR IRQ resource\n");
> + goto err_release_group1;
> + }
> }
> -#endif
>
> rc = edac_device_add_device(dci);
> if (rc) {
> @@ -2122,6 +2121,9 @@ static int altr_edac_a10_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, edac);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&edac->a10_ecc_devices);
>
> + edac->is_s10 = of_device_is_compatible(pdev->dev.of_node,
> + "altr,socfpga-s10-ecc-manager");
> +
I tested this version on both 32-bit and 64-bit platforms and there were
no regression. But I'd like to see if we can avoid using
of_device_is_compatible in runtime code and see if we can just bind to
the "altr,socfpga-s10-ecc-manager" if possible?
Thanks,
Dinh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-25 12:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-15 19:15 [PATCH] EDAC/altera: use SDMMC compatibles to select A10/S10 IRQ layout AZ9tumas
2026-06-15 20:27 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-06-16 8:17 ` [PATCH v2] " Rounak Das
2026-06-16 14:44 ` Dinh Nguyen
[not found] ` <3131206B-1E30-4EED-A327-D6FD39E6C4E8@gmail.com>
2026-06-16 23:58 ` Rounak Das
2026-06-24 14:55 ` Dinh Nguyen
2026-06-17 0:07 ` [PATCH v3] EDAC/altera: use ECC manager compatible " Rounak Das
2026-06-18 10:37 ` Dinh Nguyen
2026-06-18 13:26 ` Rounak Das
2026-06-25 12:09 ` Dinh Nguyen [this message]
2026-06-26 8:22 ` Rounak Das
2026-06-26 13:42 ` Dinh Nguyen
[not found] ` <4a6cf8c0-e425-4381-adf3-daaa1b20ba96@kernel.org>
2026-06-24 14:18 ` [PATCH v2] EDAC/altera: use SDMMC compatibles " Rounak Das
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=72efba41-f8b2-4cd2-9ce6-824cfc1a9d2c@kernel.org \
--to=dinguyen@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rounakdas2025@gmail.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox